<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1-3.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.3" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xml:lang="ru"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">communicology</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="ru">Коммуникология</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Communicology</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="ppub">2311-3065</issn><issn pub-type="epub">2311-3332</issn><publisher><publisher-name>МАК</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.21453/2311-3065-2021-9-3-63-72</article-id><article-id custom-type="elpub" pub-id-type="custom">communicology-144</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>СОЦИОЛОГИЯ КУЛЬТУРЫ</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>SOCIOLOGY OF CULTURE</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>Социологический дискурс-анализ контекста концепции “Один пояс, один путь”</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Sociological Discourse Analysis of the Concept “One Belt, One Road” Context</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Помозова</surname><given-names>Н. Б.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Pomozova</surname><given-names>N. B.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>Наталья Борисовна Помозова – кандидат социологических наук, доцент кафедры Современного Востока Факультета истории, политологии и права</p><p>Москва, 125047, Миусская площадь, 6 </p></bio><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Natalia B. Pomozova – CandSc (Soc.), assistant professor at the Department of Contemporary East </p><p>125047, Moscow, Miusskaya Square, 6 </p></bio><email xlink:type="simple">npomozova@mail.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff-1"><aff xml:lang="ru"><institution>Российский государственный гуманитарный университет</institution><country>Россия</country></aff><aff xml:lang="en"><institution>Russian State University for the Humanities</institution><country>Russian Federation</country></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date pub-type="collection"><year>2021</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>28</day><month>09</month><year>2021</year></pub-date><volume>9</volume><issue>3</issue><fpage>63</fpage><lpage>72</lpage><permissions><copyright-statement>Copyright &amp;#x00A9; Помозова Н.Б., 2021</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2021</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Помозова Н.Б.</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Pomozova N.B.</copyright-holder><license xml:lang="ru" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.</license-p></license><license xml:lang="en" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.</license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://www.communicology.ru/jour/article/view/144">https://www.communicology.ru/jour/article/view/144</self-uri><abstract><p>В статье исследуется контекст концепции “Один пояс, один путь” на основе выступлений Председателя КНР Си Цзиньпина с 2013 по 2021 гг. С момента первых упоминаний о Морском Шелковом пути XXI века Ли Кэцяном в 2013 г. произошла трансформация концепции, в частности, она была дополнена сухопутным экономическим проектом, и за ней закрепилось название “Один пояс, один путь” (Пояс и путь). Концепция стала ассоциироваться с именем Председателя КНР Си Цзиньпином как ее инициатора, в дискурсе которого она звучит весьма часто. В качестве методологической основы исследования был выбрвн социологический дискурс-анализ в сочетании с рефлексивной социологией международных отношений и анализом биографических данных члена Постоянного комитета Политбюро ЦК КПК Ван Хунина, который считается одним из авторов исследуемой концепции и советников Си Цзиньпина. Академический бэкгрануд, опыт общения с американской интеллектуальной элитой, а также научный интерес к исследованию европейских философских концепций обусловили социологическую рефлексию, повлиявшую не только на смысловое наполнение “Одного пояса, одного пути”, но и на внешнюю политику Китая в целом, приоритетным направлением которой является европейское. В настоящее время разворачивается борьба дискурсов КНР и США за влияние (власть, по М. Фуко) на европейском континенте, рефлексивным следствием которой стало предложение Дж. Байдена создать альтернативный китайской Инициативе Пояса и пути проект.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="en"><p>From the standpoint of sociological discourse analysis and reflective sociology the article examines the context of the “One Belt, One Road” concept based on some of the speeches of the President of the People’s Republic of China Xi Jinping from 2013 to 2021. Since the first mention of the 21st Century Maritime Silk Road by Li Keqiang in 2013, there has been some transformation of the concept, in particular, it was supplemented by an overland economic project, and the name “One Belt, One Road” (Belt and Road) was stuck behind it. The concept has come to be associated with the name of the President of the People’s Republic of China Xi Jinping as its initiator, in whose discourse it sounds quite often. Of particular interest is the analysis of the biographical data of Wang Huning, member of the Standing Committee of the Politburo of the CPC Central Committee, who is considered one of the authors of the concept under study and Xi Jinping’s advisers. The academic background, the experience of communicating with the American intellectual elite, as well as the scientific interest in the study of European philosophical concepts led to sociological reflection, which influenced not only the semantic content of the Belt and Road, but also the foreign policy of China as a whole, the priority of which is European.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>социологический дискурс-анализ</kwd><kwd>“Один пояс</kwd><kwd>один путь”</kwd><kwd>социологическая рефлексия</kwd><kwd>Ван Хунин</kwd><kwd>Си Цзиньпин</kwd><kwd>Китай</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>sociological discourse analysis</kwd><kwd>“One Belt</kwd><kwd>One Road”</kwd><kwd>sociological reflection</kwd><kwd>Wang Huning</kwd><kwd>Xi Jinping</kwd><kwd>China</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="cit1"><label>1</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Бурдье П. (1993). Политические позиции и культурный капитал // Бурдье П. Социология политики. М.: Socio-Logos.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Arifon O. (2019). Comparing Chinese and European Discourses regarding the “Belt and Road Initiative”. Revue française des sciences de l’information et de la communication. Société Française des Sciences de l’Information et de la Communication. No. 17: https://journals.openedition.org/rfsic/6212#abstract.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit2"><label>2</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Денисов И.Е., Адамова Д.Л. (2017). Формулы внешней политики Си Цзиньпина: основные особенности и проблемы интерпретации // Китай в мировой и региональной политике. История и современность. С. 76-90.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Bourdieu P. (1993). Political positions and cultural capital. In: Sociology of politics (Transl.). M.: Socio-Logos (In Rus.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit3"><label>3</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Зуенко И.Ю., Габуев А.Т. (2018). Пояс и путь в России: эволюция экспертного дискурса // Россия в глобальной политике. № 4. С. 142-168.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Denisov I.E., Adamova D.L. (2017). Xi Jinping's foreign policy formulas: main features and problems of interpretation. China in world and regional politics. History and modernity. P. 76-90 (In Rus.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit4"><label>4</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Муратшина К.Г. (2018). Китайская инициатива “Один пояс, один путь” в оценках европейских экспертно-аналитических центров (2013-2017 гг. ) // Вестник ВолГУ. Серия 4, История. Регионоведение. Международные отношения. № 4. С. 131-146.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Foucault M. (1981). The order of discourse / R. Young (ed.) Untying the text: A post-structuralist reader. London: Routledge.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit5"><label>5</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Литвак Н.В., Помозова Н.Б. (2021). Китайский дипломатический дискурс для Европы: изменения стиля // Россия в глобальной политике. Том19, № 1. С. 50-69 (на англ.).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Hutabarat A.V. (2019). Political Discourse Analysis in Translation of Speech Texts on “One Belt One Road” (OBOR). Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research. P. 318-317.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit6"><label>6</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Рикёр П. (2008). Конфликт интерпретаций. Очерки о герменевтике. Академический проект.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Litvak N.V., Pomozova N.B. (2021). Chinese diplomatic discourse for Europe: style changes. Russia in global politics. Vol. 19, No. 1. P. 50-69 (In Rus.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit7"><label>7</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Arifon O. (2019). Comparing Chinese and European Discourses regarding the “Belt and Road Initiative”. Revue française des sciences de l’information et de la communication. Société Française des Sciences de l’Information et de la Communication. No. 17: https://journals.openedition.org/rfsic/6212#abstract.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Muratshina K.G. (2018). Chinese initiative “One Belt, One Road” in the assessments of European expert and analytical centers (2013-2017). Bulletin of VolSU. Series 4, History. Regional studies. International relationships. No. 4. P. 131-146 (In Rus.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit8"><label>8</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Foucault M. (1981). The order of discourse / R. Young (ed.) Untying the text: A post-structuralist reader. London: Routledge.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Patapan Haig, Wang Yi (2018). The Hidden Ruler: Wang Huning and the Making of Contemporary China. Journal of Contemporary China. Griffith University. P. 1-19.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit9"><label>9</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Patapan Haig, Wang Yi (2018). The Hidden Ruler: Wang Huning and the Making of Contemporary China. Journal of Contemporary China. Griffith University. P. 1-19.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Pomozova N. B. (2020). European Values and the Chinese Factor. Russia in Global Affairs. Vol. 1. January – March: https://eng.globalaffairs.ru/articles/european-values-chinese-factor/.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit10"><label>10</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Hutabarat A.V. (2019). Political Discourse Analysis in Translation of Speech Texts on “One Belt One Road” (OBOR). Advances in Social Science, Education and Humanities Research. P. 318-317.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Ricoeur P. (2008). Conflict of interpretations. Essays on hermeneutics. Academic project.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit11"><label>11</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Pomozova N. B. (2020). European Values and the Chinese Factor. Russia in Global Affairs. Vol. 1. January – March: https://eng.globalaffairs.ru/articles/european-values-chinese-factor/.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Wang Huning (1992). Meiguo fandui Meiguo (Shanghai: Shanghai wenyi chubanshe).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit12"><label>12</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Wang Huning (1992). Meiguo fandui Meiguo (Shanghai: Shanghai wenyi chubanshe).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Ya Xiao, Yue Li, Jie Hu (2019). Construction of the Belt and Road Initiative in Chinese and American Media: A Critical Discourse Analysis Based on Self-Built Corpora. International Journal of English Linguistics. Vol. 9. № 3. P. 68-77.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit13"><label>13</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Ya Xiao, Yue Li, Jie Hu (2019). Construction of the Belt and Road Initiative in Chinese and American Media: A Critical Discourse Analysis Based on Self-Built Corpora. International Journal of English Linguistics. Vol. 9. № 3. P. 68-77.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Zuenko I.Y., Gabuev A.T. (2018). Belt and Road in Russia: Evolution of Expert Discourse. Russia in Global Affairs. No. 4. P. 142-168 (In Rus.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref></ref-list><fn-group><fn fn-type="conflict"><p>The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.</p></fn></fn-group></back></article>
