communicologyКоммуникологияCommunicology2311-30652311-3332МАК10.21453/2311-3065-2018-6-2-116-123communicology-237Research ArticleПОЛИТИЧЕСКИЕ ИНСТИТУТЫ, ПРОЦЕССЫ И ТЕХНОЛОГИИPOLITICAL INSTITUTIONS, PROCESSES AND TECHNOLOGIESПраво на город: репрезентация и воспроизведение данных в городской информационной средеThe Enjoyment of Right to the City: data representation and rendering in urban information environmentКириллинаН. В.KirillinaN V.

Наталья Владимировна Кириллина, кандидат социологических наук, доцент кафедры общественных связей и медиаполитики

119571, г. Москва, проспект Вернадского, 84

Natalia Vladimirovna Kirillina, Cand. Sc. (Soc.), associate professor at the department of public relations and media policy, Institute of Public Administration and Civil Service

119571, Moscow, Vernadsky av., 82

nata.kirillina@gmail.comРоссийская академия народного хозяйства и государственной службы при Президенте РФРоссияRussian Presidential Academy of the National Economy and Public Administration (RANEPA)Russian Federation20182801202262116123Copyright © Кириллина Н.В., 20222022Кириллина Н.В.Kirillina N.V.This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.https://www.communicology.ru/jour/article/view/237

В статье рассматривается влияние цифровых технологий и мультимедиа на формирование и развитие социального пространства современного города. Цифровое воспроизведение информации, полиреферентность современных информационных систем оказывают безусловное влияние на формирование городской среды и предопределяют её восприятие социальными акторами – горожанами и внешней аудиторией. В контексте подхода, предложенного А. Лефевром («право на город»), информация и доступ к ней трактуется как имманентное жизни современного цивилизованного города и неотъемлемое право проживающих в нем и находящихся на его территории граждан. Ставится вопрос о распределении ролей в коммуникативной цепи, формирующей городское пространство, и роли технико-технологических медиаторов в этом процессе: поисковых систем, мобильных операторов, городских информационных ресурсов и баз данных.

The paper is dedicated to the influence of digital technologies and multimedia on the formation and development of the social space of a modern city. Digital reproduction of information, multireference of modern information systems exert an implicit influence on the formation of the urban environment and predetermine its perception by social actors – citizens and external audiences. In the context of the approach by A. Lefebvre (‘the right to the city’), information and its accessibility are treated as immanent to the life of a modern civilized city and constitutes the inalienable right of citizens. The author brings up the point of roles distribution in the communicative chain in urban spaces and the role of technical and technological mediators in this process: search engines, mobile operators, urban information resources and databases.

информатизацияурбанизациягородская средасоциальное конструирование городского пространствауправление коммуникациейinformatizationurbanizationurban environmentsocial design of urban spacecommunication managementReferencesCastells M. (1992). European Cities, the Information Society and the Global Economy. Amsterdam: Centrum.Castells M. (1992). European Cities, the Information Society and the Global Economy. Amsterdam: Centrum.Graham M., Zook M., Boulton A. (2013). Augmented Reality in Urban Places: contested content and the duplicity of code. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 38(3). P.: 464–479. Graham S., Marvin S. (1996). Telecommunications and the City: Electronic Spaces, Urban Places. London: Routledge.Graham M., Zook M., Boulton A. (2013). Augmented Reality in Urban Places: contested content and the duplicity of code. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 38(3). P.: 464–479. Graham S., Marvin S. (1996). Telecommunications and the City: Electronic Spaces, Urban Places. London: Routledge.Granovetter M. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78(6). P.: 1360–1380.Granovetter M. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78(6). P.: 1360–1380.Harvey D. (1989). The Urban Experience. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Harvey D. (1989). The Urban Experience. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Jeffres L., Lin C. (2006). Metropolitan Websites as Urban Communication. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2006.00303.x.Jeffres L., Lin C. (2006). Metropolitan Websites as Urban Communication. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2006.00303.x.Kitchin R., Dodge M. (2011). Code/Space. Cambridge: MIT Press.Kitchin R., Dodge M. (2011). Code/Space. Cambridge: MIT Press.Lasswell H. (1948). The Structure and Function of Communication in Society. In Schramm W. (ed.) (1960). Mass Communications (2nd ed.). Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press. P.117-129.Lasswell H. (1948). The Structure and Function of Communication in Society. In Schramm W. (ed.) (1960). Mass Communications (2nd ed.). Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press. P.117-129.Lefebvre H. (1968). Le Droit à la ville. Paris: Anthropos (In Fr.).Lefebvre H. (1968). Le Droit à la ville. Paris: Anthropos (In Fr.).Lefebvre H. (1991). The Production of Space / transl. D. Nicholson-Smith. Oxford: Blackwell. Lefebvre H. (2003). The Urban Revolution / transl. R. Bononno. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Lefebvre H. (1991). The Production of Space / transl. D. Nicholson-Smith. Oxford: Blackwell. Lefebvre H. (2003). The Urban Revolution / transl. R. Bononno. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Mitchell D. (2003). The Right to the City: social justice and the fight for public space. NY, L.: Guilford Press.Mitchell D. (2003). The Right to the City: social justice and the fight for public space. NY, L.: Guilford Press.Park R. (1967). The City as a Social Laboratory. In: Robert E. Park On Social Control and Collective Behavior / Selected Papers. Chicago, London: Phoenix Books, The University Of Chicago Press. P. 3-18.Park R. (1967). The City as a Social Laboratory. In: Robert E. Park On Social Control and Collective Behavior / Selected Papers. Chicago, London: Phoenix Books, The University Of Chicago Press. P. 3-18.Porter M.E. (1995). The competitive advantage of the inner city. Harvard Business Review, 73(3). P. 55–71.Porter M.E. (1995). The competitive advantage of the inner city. Harvard Business Review, 73(3). P. 55–71.Purcell M. (2002). Excavating Lefebvre: the right to the city and its urban politics of the inhabitant. GeoJournal, 58. P. 99-108.Purcell M. (2002). Excavating Lefebvre: the right to the city and its urban politics of the inhabitant. GeoJournal, 58. P. 99-108.Shaw J., Graham M. (2017). An Informational Right to the City? Code, Content, Control, and the Urbanization of Information. Antipode: a radical journal of geography, 49(4). P. 907-927. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/anti.1231.Shaw J., Graham M. (2017). An Informational Right to the City? Code, Content, Control, and the Urbanization of Information. Antipode: a radical journal of geography, 49(4). P. 907-927. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/anti.1231.Wright C.R. (1986). Mass Communication: a sociological perspective. 3d ed. Random House.Wright C.R. (1986). Mass Communication: a sociological perspective. 3d ed. Random House.

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.