communicologyКоммуникологияCommunicology2311-30652311-3332МАК10.21453/2311-3065-2018-6-3-140-151communicology-242Research ArticleТЕОРИЯ И ФИЛОСОФИЯ ПОЛИТИКИ, ИСТОРИЯ И МЕТОДОЛОГИЯ ПОЛИТИЧЕСКОЙ НАУКИЕсть ли у политики перспектива?Is There a Promise of Politics?ЭнрикесМ.HenriquesM.

 Мендо Кастро Энрикес, доктор философии, профессор, член Совета CEFi.

 1649-023 Лиссабон, Пальма-де-Чима

 Mendo Castro Henriques, PhD, Professor, member of the CEFi Board 

 1649-023 Lisbon, Palma de Cima 

mendohenriques@fch.lisboa.ucp.ptКатолический университет ПортугалииПортугалияUniversidade Católica Portuguesa (Catholic University of Portugal)Portugal20182801202263140151Copyright © Энрикес М., 20222022Энрикес М.Henriques M.Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.https://www.communicology.ru/jour/article/view/242

Сегодня мир изменяется, становится все более сложным и непредсказуемым. В этих условиях необходимо ясно понимать и предвидеть политическую реакцию на возможные изменения. Проблема неолиберализма – не либеральная экономика, которая увеличила мировое богатство и принесла беспрецедентное процветание развивающимся странам; проблема – в приоритете рыночной экономики над иными социальными аспектами. Мы видим политическую перспективу в качестве основной категории анализа, которая вопреки абстрактным обобщениям учитывает время, разоблачающее детали происходящего, и тем самым помогает избавиться от политического фундаментализма какого бы то ни было идеологического толка в политике.

We must assess the response of politics to a world that is changing fast and in a way that is increasingly intertwined, complex and unpredictable. Our problem with neoliberalism is not the liberal economy that increased world wealth and brought unprecedented prosperity to emerging countries: our problem is the primacy of the economic markets above every other social dimension. We introduce promise as a major category of analysis that respects time unfolding particularities – contrary to abstract generalities – and helps to rescue politics from the abuses of political fundamentalisms of diverse ideological persuasions.

политическая перспективаобщностьпотенциалнеолиберализмрыночная экономикаpromisegeneralityprospectiveneoliberalismmarketsReferencesAgamben G. (2005). The Open. Man and Animal. Stanford University Press: California.Agamben G. (2005). The Open. Man and Animal. Stanford University Press: California.Acemoglu D., Robinson J. (2012). Why Nations Fail: The Origins of Power, Prosperity and Poverty. Profile Books.Acemoglu D., Robinson J. (2012). Why Nations Fail: The Origins of Power, Prosperity and Poverty. Profile Books.Bauman Z. (1998). Work, consumerism and the new poor. Buckingham: Open University Press.Bauman Z. (1998). Work, consumerism and the new poor. Buckingham: Open University Press.Beck U. (1994). The reinvention of politics: towards a theory of reflexive modernization. In: Beck U., Giddens A., Lash S. (ed.) Reflexive modernization: politics, Tradition and Aesthetics in the Modern Social Order. Cambridge: Polity Press.Beck U. (1994). The reinvention of politics: towards a theory of reflexive modernization. In: Beck U., Giddens A., Lash S. (ed.) Reflexive modernization: politics, Tradition and Aesthetics in the Modern Social Order. Cambridge: Polity Press.Benjamin W. (1991). Gesammelte Schriften IV 1, Suhrkamp Verlag, Francfort.Benjamin W. (1991). Gesammelte Schriften IV 1, Suhrkamp Verlag, Francfort.Carvalho F. (2000). Origem e evolução do Messianismo em Israel. Didaskalia, XXX. P. 29-51.Carvalho F. (2000). Origem e evolução do Messianismo em Israel. Didaskalia, XXX. P. 29-51.Greer J.M. (2005). How Civilizations Fall: A Theory of Catabolic Collapse. Retirado de www.ecoshock.orgitranscripts/greer_ on_collapse.pdf.Greer J.M. (2005). How Civilizations Fall: A Theory of Catabolic Collapse. Retirado de www.ecoshock.orgitranscripts/greer_ on_collapse.pdf.Habermas J. (2001). The postnational constellation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Habermas J. (2001). The postnational constellation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Hawken P. (2007). Blessed unrest: How the largest movement in the world came into being, and why no one saw it coming. Penguin.Hawken P. (2007). Blessed unrest: How the largest movement in the world came into being, and why no one saw it coming. Penguin.Henriques M. (2006). Panorama de la Citoyenneté. Paris. Centre de Recherche de la Fédération Internationale des Universités Chrétiennes.Henriques M. (2006). Panorama de la Citoyenneté. Paris. Centre de Recherche de la Fédération Internationale des Universités Chrétiennes.Henriques M., Khachani M. (2006). Security in the Mediterranean: Playing with fire. Amsterdam. IOS Press.Henriques M., Khachani M. (2006). Security in the Mediterranean: Playing with fire. Amsterdam. IOS Press.Huntington S., Crozier M. Watanuki J. (1976). The crisis of democracy: On the Governability of Democracies on the governability of democracies. NY: New York University Press.Huntington S., Crozier M. Watanuki J. (1976). The crisis of democracy: On the Governability of Democracies on the governability of democracies. NY: New York University Press.Jonas H. (1995). El principio de responsabilidad: ensayo de una ética para a civilización tecnológica. Barcelona: Herder Editorial.Jonas H. (1995). El principio de responsabilidad: ensayo de una ética para a civilización tecnológica. Barcelona: Herder Editorial.Kaase M. (1984). The Challenge of the “Participatory Revolution” in Pluralist Democracies. International Political Science Review 5: 299-318Kaase M. (1984). The Challenge of the “Participatory Revolution” in Pluralist Democracies. International Political Science Review 5: 299-318Lonergan B. (1972). Method in theology. NY: Simon & Schuster.Lonergan B. (1972). Method in theology. NY: Simon & Schuster.Papa Francisco (2015). Lodato Sí, Lisboa: Paulinas.Papa Francisco (2015). Lodato Sí, Lisboa: Paulinas.Pateman C. (1970). Participation and democratic theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Pateman C. (1970). Participation and democratic theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Pateman C. (2012). Participatory Democracy Revisited. APSA Presidential Address. Perspectives on Politics, No. 10.Pateman C. (2012). Participatory Democracy Revisited. APSA Presidential Address. Perspectives on Politics, No. 10.Pedreira J., Henriques M., Barros N. (2016) O dinheiro das nossas dívidas. Lisboa: Penguin Random House – Objectiva.Pedreira J., Henriques M., Barros N. (2016) O dinheiro das nossas dívidas. Lisboa: Penguin Random House – Objectiva.Polanyi K. (1968). The great transformation: The political and economic origins of our time. Boston, Massachusetts: Beacon Press.Polanyi K. (1968). The great transformation: The political and economic origins of our time. Boston, Massachusetts: Beacon Press.Rawls J. (2000). A Theory of Justice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Rawls J. (2000). A Theory of Justice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Ross C. (2012). A Revolução sem Líder. Lisboa: Bertrand.Ross C. (2012). A Revolução sem Líder. Lisboa: Bertrand.Sardar Z. (2007). Prosperity: a transmodern analysis [el. source]: http://www.sd-comission.org.uk.Sardar Z. (2007). Prosperity: a transmodern analysis [el. source]: http://www.sd-comission.org.uk.Schnapper D. (1998). Contra o fim do Trabalho. Lisboa: Terramar.Schnapper D. (1998). Contra o fim do Trabalho. Lisboa: Terramar.Sen A. (1999). Development as freedom. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Sen A. (1999). Development as freedom. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Standing G. ( 2011). The New Dangerous Class. Bloomsbury: London.Standing G. ( 2011). The New Dangerous Class. Bloomsbury: London.Talmon J. (1952). The Origins of Totalitarian Democracy. Vol.1. London: Secker & Warburg.Talmon J. (1952). The Origins of Totalitarian Democracy. Vol.1. London: Secker & Warburg.Voegelin E. (1951). The New Science of Politics. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Voegelin E. (1951). The New Science of Politics. Chicago: Chicago University Press.

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.