<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1-3.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.3" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xml:lang="ru"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">communicology</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="ru">Коммуникология</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Communicology</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="ppub">2311-3065</issn><issn pub-type="epub">2311-3332</issn><publisher><publisher-name>МАК</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.21453/2311-3065-2022-10-2-170-179</article-id><article-id custom-type="elpub" pub-id-type="custom">communicology-279</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>СОЦИОЛОГИЯ УПРАВЛЕНИЯ</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>SOCIOLOGY OF MANAGEMENT</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>Фрагментация аудитории медиа: от глобальной деревни к глобальному театру</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Fragmentation of Media Audience: from global village to global theater</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Кириллина</surname><given-names>Н. В.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Kirillina</surname><given-names>N. V.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>Кириллина Наталья Владимировна – к.с.н., доцент кафедры общественных связей и медиаполитики факультета журналистики Института государственной службы и управления РАНХиГС.</p><p>119571, г. Москва, пр-т Вернадского, 84.</p></bio><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Kirillina Natalia Vladimirovna – CandSc (Soc.), associate professor at the department of public relations and media policy </p><p>119571, Moscow, Vernadsky ave, 84.</p></bio><email xlink:type="simple">nata.kirillina@gmail.com</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff-1"><aff xml:lang="ru">Российская академия народного хозяйства и государственной службы при Президенте Российской Федерации (РАНХиГС)<country>Россия</country></aff><aff xml:lang="en">Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration (RANEPA)<country>Russian Federation</country></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date pub-type="collection"><year>2022</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>30</day><month>06</month><year>2022</year></pub-date><volume>10</volume><issue>2</issue><fpage>170</fpage><lpage>179</lpage><permissions><copyright-statement>Copyright &amp;#x00A9; Кириллина Н.В., 2022</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2022</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Кириллина Н.В.</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Kirillina N.V.</copyright-holder><license license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.</license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://www.communicology.ru/jour/article/view/279">https://www.communicology.ru/jour/article/view/279</self-uri><abstract><p>Развитие средств массовой информации и социальных сетей радикально изменило практики потребления медиа, а собственно аудитория превратилась в сообщества активных пользователей – субъектов коммуникационных процессов. Пользователи получают и активно используют право выбора того формата, канала и контента, который им наиболее близок на основе их личного опыта, психоэмоционального состояния, социокультурных характеристик и предпочтений. Но во-первых, выбор пользователя не всегда является осознанным, во-вторых, самоидентификация пользователя и дальнейший выбор канала и содержания часто основан на принципе «свой» – «чужой», что ведет к усилению социальной и политической поляризации в процессе потребления медиа. В статье на основе анализа российских и зарубежных источников, посвященных поведению аудитории современных медиа и фрагментации аудитории, а также с позиций структурного подхода к изучению социальных систем, анализируется процессы, взаимосвязанные с фрагментацией аудитории медиа. На основе проведенного анализа автор приходит к заключению о том, что фрагментация аудитории и поляризация общественного мнения обусловлена, помимо возможных политических барьеров, особенностями функционирования медисистемы. </p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="en"><p>The development of mass media and social networks has radically changed the consumption of content by the audience, which has in fact turned into relatively separated communities of users, i.e. subjects of communication processes. Users get and actively use the possibility to choose the format, the channel and the content based on their personal experience, psycho-emotional state, socio-cultural characteristics. However, the users choice is not always conscious, and besides that, the users self-identification and further choice of channel and content is often based on ‘friend-or-foe’ principle, which leads to an increase in social and political polarization in the process of media consumption. The paper is based on the analysis of Russian and foreign sources dedicated to the behaviour of the audience of modern media and to the processes associated with fragmentation and demassification of the media audience. As follows from the analysis of these sources and from the standpoint of a structural approach to the study of social systems, the fragmentation of the audience and the polarization of public opinion are conditioned, besides arising political barriers, by the peculiarities of the functioning of the modern media system, i.e. make part of its attributive characteristics.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>цифровые медиа</kwd><kwd>цифровая среда</kwd><kwd>интерактивная коммуникация</kwd><kwd>фрагментация аудитории</kwd><kwd>фрагментация медиа</kwd><kwd>социальная коммуникация</kwd><kwd>идентичность</kwd><kwd>социальная поляризация</kwd><kwd>политическая поляризация</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>mediasystem</kwd><kwd>digital media</kwd><kwd>interactive communication</kwd><kwd>audience fragmentation</kwd><kwd>media fragmentation</kwd><kwd>social communication</kwd><kwd>identity</kwd><kwd>social polarization</kwd><kwd>political polarization</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="cit1"><label>1</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Бакулев Г.П. (2013). Социокультурные эффекты фрагментации аудитории // Вестник ВГИК. № 17. С. 137-146.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Bakulev G.P. (2013). Socio-cultural effects of audience fragmentation. Bulletin of VGIK. No. 17. P. 137-146 (In Rus.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit2"><label>2</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Кириллина Н.В. (2021). О роли пользователя и фрагментации сети // Коммуникология. Том 9. № 2. С. 41-49.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Baudrillard J. (1981). Simulacra and Simulation. Michigan: University of Michigan Press.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit3"><label>3</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Кириллина Н.В. (2021). Фрагментация цифрового пространства и социокультурные аспекты развития цифровой дипломатии // Россия и мир: диалоги. Материалы Пятой международной научно-практической конференции 18–19 марта 2021 г. С. 88-95.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Giddens A. (1991). Modernity and Self-Identity. Polity Press.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit4"><label>4</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Лещенко Т.А., Соколова И.В., Теплова Л.И. (2019). Неизбежность отчуждения коммуникации в эпоху глобализации // Информационное общество. № 1-2. С. 69-74.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Kirillina N.V. (2021). Fragmentation of the digital space and socio-cultural aspects of the development of digital diplomacy // RUSSIA AND THE WORLD: DIALOGUES. Proceedings of Int. Sc. Conference March 18–19, 2021. P. 88-95 (In Rus.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit5"><label>5</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Мамедов А.К., Якушина О.И. (2015). Поиск идентичности в современных реалиях // Вестник РУДН, серия Социология. Том 15. № 4. С. 20-30.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Kirillina N.V. (2021). On the user roles and fragmentation of the global network. Communicology. Vol. 9. No. 2. P. 41-49 (In Rus.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit6"><label>6</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Назаров М.М. (2015). К вопросу о фрагментации современного медиаландшафта: теория и эмпирические результаты // Информационное общество. № 2-3. С. 91-100.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Ksiazek T. (2019). Fragmentation of News Audience. In: T. Vos, F. Hanusch (eds). The International Encyclopedia of Journalism Studies. John Wiley &amp; Sons.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit7"><label>7</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Назаров М.М. (2018). Современная медиасреда: разнообразие и фрагментация // Социологические исследования. № 8. С. 54-64.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Leshchenko T.A., Sokolova I.V., Teplova L.I. (2019). The inevitability of communication alienation in the era of globalization. Information Society. No. 1-2. P. 69-74 (In Rus.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit8"><label>8</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Baudrillard J. (1981). Simulacra and Simulation. Michigan: University of Michigan Press.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Mamedov A.K., Yakushina O.I. (2015). The search for identity in modern realities. RUDN Journal of Sociology. Vol. 15. No. 4. P. 20-30 (In Rus.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit9"><label>9</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Giddens A. (1991). Modernity and Self-Identity. Polity Press.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">McLuhan M. (1962). The Gutenberg Galaxy: The Making of Typographic Man. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit10"><label>10</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Ksiazek T. (2019). Fragmentation of News Audience. In: T. Vos, F. Hanusch (eds). The International Encyclopedia of Journalism Studies. John Wiley &amp; Sons.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">McLuhan M. (1964). Understanding Media: The Extensions of Man. McGraw-Hill.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit11"><label>11</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">McLuhan M. (1962). The Gutenberg Galaxy: The Making of Typographic Man. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">McLuhan M. (1967). Hot &amp; Cool. New York: The New American Library.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit12"><label>12</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">McLuhan M. (1964). Understanding Media: The Extensions of Man. McGraw-Hill.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Nazarov M.M. (2015). On the Fragmentation of the Modern Media Landscape: Theory and Empirical Results. Information Society. No. 2-3. P. 91-100 (In Rus.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit13"><label>13</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">McLuhan M. (1967). Hot &amp; Cool. New York: The New American Library.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Nazarov M.M. (2018). Modern media environment: diversity and fragmentation. Socis. Sociological Studies. No. 8. P. 54-64 (In Rus.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit14"><label>14</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Newman N., Fletcher R., Kalogeropoulos A., Levy D., Nielsen R. (2017). Reuters institute Digital News Report [el. source]: https://reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/sites/default/files/Digital%20News%20Report%202017%20web_0.pdf.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Newman N., Fletcher R., Kalogeropoulos A., Levy D., Nielsen R. (2017). Reuters institute Digital News Report [el. source]: https://reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/sites/default/files/Digital%20News%20Report%202017%20web_0.pdf.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit15"><label>15</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Pariser E. (2011). The Filter Bubble: How the New Personalized Web Is Changing what We Read and How We Think. London: Penguin Books.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Pariser E. (2011). The Filter Bubble: How the New Personalized Web Is Changing what We Read and How We Think. London: Penguin Books.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit16"><label>16</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Pham T.M., Kondor I., Hanel R., Thurner S. (2020). The effect of social balance on social fragmentation. Journal of the Royal Society Interface. Vol. 17. Issue 172. DOI: 10.1098/rsif.2020.0752.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Sunstein C.R. (2009). Republic.com 2.0. Princeton University Press.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit17"><label>17</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Sunstein C.R. (2009). Republic.com 2.0. Princeton University Press.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Toffler A. (1980). The Third Wave. N.Y.: Morrow.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit18"><label>18</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Toffler A. (1980). The Third Wave. N.Y.: Morrow.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Turow J. (1997). Breaking up America: Advertisers and the new media world. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit19"><label>19</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Turow J. (1997). Breaking up America: Advertisers and the new media world. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Van Dijk J. (1999). The Network Society. SAGE Publications.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit20"><label>20</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Van Dijk J. (1999). The Network Society. SAGE Publications.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Webster J. (2018). Audience Behavior. In: Mediated Communication. DeGruyter [available from]: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/329972213_Audience_Behavior.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit21"><label>21</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Webster J. (2018). Audience Behavior. In: Mediated Communication. DeGruyter [available from]: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/329972213_Audience_Behavior.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Webster J., Ksiazek T. (2012). The dynamics of audience fragmentation: Public attention in an age of digital media. Journal of Communication. Vol. 62. No.1. P. 39-56.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit22"><label>22</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Webster J., Ksiazek T. (2012). The dynamics of audience fragmentation: Public attention in an age of digital media. Journal of Communication. Vol. 62. No.1. P. 39-56.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Weisberg J. (2011). Bubble Trouble: Is Web personalization turning us into solipsistic twits? Slate Magazine [el. source]: https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2011/06/eli-pariser-s-the-filter-bubbleis-web-personalization-turning-us-into-solipsistic-twits.html.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit23"><label>23</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Weisberg J. (2011). Bubble Trouble: Is Web personalization turning us into solipsistic twits? Slate Magazine [el. source]: https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2011/06/eli-pariser-s-the-filter-bubbleis-web-personalization-turning-us-into-solipsistic-twits.html.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Weisberg J. (2011). Bubble Trouble: Is Web personalization turning us into solipsistic twits? Slate Magazine [el. source]: https://slate.com/news-and-politics/2011/06/eli-pariser-s-the-filter-bubbleis-web-personalization-turning-us-into-solipsistic-twits.html.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref></ref-list><fn-group><fn fn-type="conflict"><p>The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.</p></fn></fn-group></back></article>
