communicologyКоммуникологияCommunicology2311-30652311-3332МАК10.21453/2311-3065-2024-12-1-108-121communicology-403Research ArticleСОЦИАЛЬНАЯ СТРУКТУРА, СОЦИАЛЬНЫЕ ИНСТИТУТЫ И ПРОЦЕССЫSOCIAL STRUCTURE, SOCIAL INSTITUTIONS AND PROCESSESТрансформация цифровых технологий в местном самоуправленииTransformation of Digital Technologies in Local Governmenthttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-1477-7414ШарковФ. И.SharkovF. I.

Шарков Феликс Изосимович – доктор социологических наук, профессор, заслуженный деятель науки РФ, профессор кафедры социологии МГИМО (У) МИД РФ; заведующий кафедрой общественных связей и медиаполитики, заместитель декана факультета журналистики факультета журналистики ИГСУ РАНХиГС.

119545, Москва, пр-т Вернадского, 76

Felix I. Sharkov – DSc (Soc.), Professor, Honored Scientist of the Russian Federation, Professor of the Department of Sociology of MGIMO – University; Head of the Department of Public Relations and Media Policy, Deputy Dean of the Faculty of Journalism, RANEPA.

119545, Moscow, Vernadsky av., 76

sharkov_felix@mail.ruМиллерД. Г.MillerD. G.

Миллер Дмитрий Георгиевич – муниципальный депутат по району Михайлово-Ярцевское г. Москвы, юрист, компания «Автодирект».

108833, Москва, поселение Михайлово-Ярцевское, пос. Шишкин Лес, стр. 41

Dmitry G. Miller – municipal deputy at Mikhailovo-Yartsevskoye district of Moscow, lawyer at Avtodirect LLC.

108833, Moscow, Mikhailovo-Yartsevskoye settlement, Shishkin Les, 41

info@amom.ruМГИМО МИД РоссииРоссияMGIMO – UniversityRussian FederationКомпания «Автодирект»РоссияAvtodirect LLCRussian Federation202409042024121108121Copyright © Шарков Ф.И., Миллер Д.Г., 20242024Шарков Ф.И., Миллер Д.Г.Sharkov F.I., Miller D.G.This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.https://www.communicology.ru/jour/article/view/403

Существует мало теоретических обоснований интегрированного управления в муниципалитетах. Особенно это касается необходимости формулирования концепции и применения цифровых технологий для муниципалитетов различного уровня. В сфере управления, осуществляемого с помощью цифровых технологий зачастую не учитываются основные ценности, характерные для общественных организаций, в частности федераций и ассоциаций, объединяющих организации и физические лица, вовлеченные в этот процесс. проблема цифровизации рассматривалась во многих областях, но на муниципальном уровне имеются лишь результаты фрагментальных описаний и то, чаще всего лишь на уровне преобразования ранее созданных контентов в цифровой формат. Авторами представлены различные подходы к применению цифровых технологий в управлении: электронное правительство, цифровой город, умный город, цифровые проекты муниципалитетах, цифровизация администрации, информационно-коммуникационные технологии в государственном и муниципальном управлении. В настоящем исследовании рассматривается редко рассматриваемый аспект, а именно трансформация цифровых технологий в управленческом процессе на городском уровне, а также их влияние на активы городской инфраструктуры. Также в настоящем исследовании сделана попытка системно рассматреть объекты муниципальной жилищной структуры в цифровом формате и привлечение внимания практического мира к той ценности, которую может привнести комплексная и интегрированная в цифровое пространство система жилищной застройки.

There is little theoretical justification for integrated management in municipalities. This especially concerns the need to formulate the concept and use of digital technologies for municipalities at various levels. This implies the need to take into account the core values characteristic of public organizations, in particular public associations and individuals involved in this process. The problem of digitalization has been considered in many areas, but at the municipal level there are only the results of fragmentary descriptions, and, most often, only at the level of converting previously created content into digital format. The authors show various approaches to the use of digital technologies in management: e-government, digital city, smart city, digital projects in municipalities, digitalization of administration, information and communication technologies in state and municipal government. This study examines a rarely considered aspect, namely the transformation of digital technologies in the management process at the city level, as well as its impact on urban infrastructure assets. Besides, the study attempts to methodize the objects of the municipal structure in a digital format and to attract the attention of the practical world to the value that a complex development system integrated into digital space can bring to the system.

муниципальное управлениеместное самоуправлениецифровые технологиицифровизациямуниципалитетыmunicipal governmentlocal governmentdigital technologiesdigitalizationmunicipalitiesReferencesВатлина Л.В. (2021). Цифровые инструменты в системе муниципального самоуправления // Известия Санкт-Петербургского государственного экономического университета. № 4 (130). С. 135-139.Aidanpaa M., Sjoberg M. (2021). Digital transformation: Governance as a transition tool: A case study at a Swedish municipality. Degree project in industrial management. KTH Royal Institute of Thechnology.Волкова А.М., Потапов А.Д. (2021). Цифровая трансформация системы муниципального управления в России: выбор модели институционального дизайна политики // Ленинградский юридический журнал. № 2 (64). С. 80-91.Alawadhi S., Aldama-Nalda A., Chourabi H., Gil-Garcia J.R., Leung S., Mellouli S., Walker S. (2012). Building understanding of smart city initiatives, in International conference on electronic government. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.Каратуева Е.Н. (2023). Влияние цифровой трансформации на муниципальное управление // Этносоциум. № 5 (179). С. 45-52.Apraez B.E., Lavrijssen S. (2019). Exploring the regulatory challenges of a possible rollout of smart water meters in The Netherlands. Competition and Regulation in Network Industries. No. 19 (3-4). P. 159-179. DOI: 10.1177/1783591719829421.Кириллина Н.В. (2018). Право на город: репрезентация и воспроизведение данных в городской информационной среде // Коммуникология. Т. 6. № 2. С. 116-123. DOI: 10.21453/2311-3065-2018-6-2-116-123.Dhillon G.S., Weerakkody V., Dwivedi Y.K. (2008). Realising transformational stage egovernment: A UK local authority perspective. Electronic Government, An International Journal. No. 5(2). P. 162-180.Куценко Д.О. (2020). Диджитализация муниципального управления в крупном городе: инструменты, барьеры и стратегии // Управленческое консультирование. № 6. С. 158-171.Divay G. (2020). Le management municipal, tome 2: Les defis de l’integration locale. PUQ. Giest S. (2017). Big data for policymaking: Fad or fast-track? Policy Sciences. No. 50 (3). P. 367-382.Aidanpaa M., Sjoberg M. (2021). Digital transformation: Governance as a transition tool: A case study at a Swedish municipality. Degree project in industrial management. KTH Royal Institute of Thechnology.Giest S., Samuels A. (2020). For good measure: Data gaps in a big data world. Policy Sciences. No. 53(3). P. 559-569.Alawadhi S., Aldama-Nalda A., Chourabi H., Gil-Garcia J.R., Leung S., Mellouli S., Walker S. (2012). Building understanding of smart city initiatives, in International conference on electronic government. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.Karatueva E.N. (2023). The influence of digital transformation on municipal management. Ethnosocium. No. 5 (179). P. 45-52 (in Rus.).Apraez B.E., Lavrijssen S. (2019). Exploring the regulatory challenges of a possible rollout of smart water meters in The Netherlands. Competition and Regulation in Network Industries. No. 19 (3-4). P. 159-179. DOI: 10.1177/1783591719829421.Kirillina N.V. (2018). Right to the city: representation and reproduction of data in the urban information environment. Communicology. No. 6 (2). P. 116-123. DOI: 10.21453/2311-3065-2018-6-2-116-123 (in Rus.).Dhillon G.S., Weerakkody V., Dwivedi Y.K. (2008). Realising transformational stage egovernment: A UK local authority perspective. Electronic Government, An International Journal. No. 5(2). P. 162-180.Klievink B., Bharosa N., Tan Y.H. (2016). The collaborative realization of public values and business goals: Governance and infrastructure of public-private information platforms. Government Information Quarterly. No. 33(1). P. 67-79.Divay G. (2020). Le management municipal, tome 2: Les defis de l’integration locale. PUQ. Giest S. (2017). Big data for policymaking: Fad or fast-track? Policy Sciences. No. 50 (3). P. 367-382.Kutsenko D.O. (2020). Digitalization of municipal government in a large city: tools, barriers and strategies. Management consulting. No. 6. P. 158-171 (in Rus.).Giest S., Samuels A. (2020). For good measure: Data gaps in a big data world. Policy Sciences. No. 53(3). P. 559-569.Lafioune N., St-Jacques M. (2020). Towards the creation of a searchable 3D smart city model. Innovation and Management Review. No. 17(3). P. 285-305.Klievink B., Bharosa N., Tan Y.H. (2016). The collaborative realization of public values and business goals: Governance and infrastructure of public-private information platforms. Government Information Quarterly. No. 33(1). P. 67-79.Layne K., Lee J. (2001). Developing fully functional E-government: A four stage model. Government Information Quarterly. No. 18 (2). P. 122-136. DOI: 10.1016/S0740-624X(01)00066-1.Lafioune N., St-Jacques M. (2020). Towards the creation of a searchable 3D smart city model. Innovation and Management Review. No. 17(3). P. 285-305.Maciejewski M. (2017). To do more, better, faster and more cheaply: Using big data in public administration. International Review of Administrative Sciences. No. 83. P. 120-135.Layne K., Lee J. (2001). Developing fully functional E-government: A four stage model. Government Information Quarterly. No. 18 (2). P. 122-136. DOI: 10.1016/S0740-624X(01)00066-1.Manny L., Duygan M., Fischer M., Rieckermann J. (2021). Barriers to the digital transformation of infrastructure sectors. Policy Sciences. No. 54(4). P. 943-983.Maciejewski M. (2017). To do more, better, faster and more cheaply: Using big data in public administration. International Review of Administrative Sciences. No. 83. P. 120-135.Matheus R., Janssen M., Maheshwari D. (2020). Data science empowering the public: Data-driven dashboards for transparent and accountable decision-making in smart cities. Government Information Quarterly. No. 37(3). 101284.Manny L., Duygan M., Fischer M., Rieckermann J. (2021). Barriers to the digital transformation of infrastructure sectors. Policy Sciences. No. 54(4). P. 943-983.Mcgill E.D. (2019). L’innovation municipale: L’entrepreneuriat dans l’administration publique locale. In: Introduction a la vie politique municipale Quebecoise. Québec: Presses de l’Université Laval. DOI: 10.2307/j.ctv1g246rs.7.Matheus R., Janssen M., Maheshwari D. (2020). Data science empowering the public: Data-driven dashboards for transparent and accountable decision-making in smart cities. Government Information Quarterly. No. 37(3). 101284.Mergel I. (2015). Opening government: Designing open innovation processes to collaborate with external problem solvers. Social Science Computer Review. No. 3(5). P. 599-612.Mcgill E.D. (2019). L’innovation municipale: L’entrepreneuriat dans l’administration publique locale. In: Introduction a la vie politique municipale Quebecoise. Québec: Presses de l’Université Laval. DOI: 10.2307/j.ctv1g246rs.7.Mergel I., Rethemeyer R.K., Isett K. (2016). Big data in public affairs. Public Administration Review. No. 76(6). P. 928-937.Mergel I. (2015). Opening government: Designing open innovation processes to collaborate with external problem solvers. Social Science Computer Review. No. 3(5). P. 599-612.Pereira G.V., Luna-Reyes L.F., Gil-Garcia J.R. (2020). Governance innovations, digital transformation and the generation of public value in Smart City initiatives. In: Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance (p. 602-608). Sustainability. No. 10 (4). P. 1278.Mergel I., Rethemeyer R.K., Isett K. (2016). Big data in public affairs. Public Administration Review. No. 76(6). P. 928-937.Roberge J., Jamet R., Nantel L., Senneville M., Tchehouali D. (2019). Smart city barometer, artificial intelligence and algorithmic culture: A comparison. Montreal, Toronto and Vancouver.Pereira G.V., Luna-Reyes L.F., Gil-Garcia J.R. (2020). Governance innovations, digital transformation and the generation of public value in Smart City initiatives. In: Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance (p. 602-608). Sustainability. No. 10 (4). P. 1278.Scime R. (1994). Cyberville and the spirit of community: Howard Rheingold meet Amitai Etzioni, available from http://gopher.well.sf.ca.us:70/00/Community/cyberville.Roberge J., Jamet R., Nantel L., Senneville M., Tchehouali D. (2019). Smart city barometer, artificial intelligence and algorithmic culture: A comparison. Montreal, Toronto and Vancouver.Shahat E., Hyun C.T., Yeom C. (2021). City digital twin potentials: A review and research agenda. Sustainability. No. 13(6). 3386. DOI: 10.3390/SU13063386.Scime R. (1994). Cyberville and the spirit of community: Howard Rheingold meet Amitai Etzioni, available from http://gopher.well.sf.ca.us:70/00/Community/cyberville.Shearmur R., Poirier V. (2016). Conceptualizing nonmarket municipal entrepreneurship: Everyday municipal innovation and the roles of metropolitan context, internal resources, and learning. Urban Affairs Review. No. 53(4). P. 718-751. DOI: 10.1177/1078087416636482.Shahat E., Hyun C.T., Yeom C. (2021). City digital twin potentials: A review and research agenda. Sustainability. No. 13(6). 3386. DOI: 10.3390/SU13063386.Shkabatur J. (2010). Municipalities at crossroads: Digital technology and local democracy in America. Brooklyn Law Review. No. 76. 1413.Shearmur R., Poirier V. (2016). Conceptualizing nonmarket municipal entrepreneurship: Everyday municipal innovation and the roles of metropolitan context, internal resources, and learning. Urban Affairs Review. No. 53(4). P. 718-751. DOI: 10.1177/1078087416636482.Sun S., Cegielski C.G., Jia L., Hall D.J. (2016). Understanding the factors affecting the organizational adoption of big data. Journal of Computer Information Systems. No. 58(3). P. 193-203. DOI: 10.1080/08874417.2016.1222891.Shkabatur J. (2010). Municipalities at crossroads: Digital technology and local democracy in America. Brooklyn Law Review. No. 76. 1413.Surbakti F.P., Wang W., Indulska M., Sadiq S. (2020). Factors influencing effective use of big data: A research framework. Information and Management. No. 57(1), 103146.Sun S., Cegielski C.G., Jia L., Hall D.J. (2016). Understanding the factors affecting the organizational adoption of big data. Journal of Computer Information Systems. No. 58(3). P. 193-203. DOI: 10.1080/08874417.2016.1222891.Surbakti T., Pinem S., Sembiring T.M., Hamzah A., Nabeshima, K. (2019). Calculation of control rods reactivity worth of RSG-GAS first core using deterministic and Monte Carlo methods. Atom Indonesia. No. 45(2). P. 69-79.Surbakti F.P., Wang W., Indulska M., Sadiq S. (2020). Factors influencing effective use of big data: A research framework. Information and Management. No. 57(1), 103146.Vatlina L.V. (2021). Digital tools in the system of municipal self-government. News of the St. Petersburg State Economic University. No. 4 (130). P. 135-139 (in Rus.).Surbakti T., Pinem S., Sembiring T.M., Hamzah A., Nabeshima, K. (2019). Calculation of control rods reactivity worth of RSG-GAS first core using deterministic and Monte Carlo methods. Atom Indonesia. No. 45(2). P. 69-79.Volkova A.M., Potapov A.D. (2021). Digital transformation of the municipal government system in Russia: choosing a model for institutional policy design. Leningrad Law Journal. No. 2 (64). P. 80-91 (in Rus.).Wang S., Feeney M.K. (2014). Determinants of information and communication technology adoption in municipalities. The American Review of Public Administration. No. 46(3). P. 292-313. DOI: 10.1177/0275074014553462.Wang S., Feeney M.K. (2014). Determinants of information and communication technology adoption in municipalities. The American Review of Public Administration. No. 46 (3). P. 292-313. DOI: 10.1177/0275074014553462.

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.