<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1-3.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.3" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xml:lang="ru"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">communicology</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="ru">Коммуникология</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Communicology</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="ppub">2311-3065</issn><issn pub-type="epub">2311-3332</issn><publisher><publisher-name>МАК</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.21453/2311-3065-2019-7-4-169-181</article-id><article-id custom-type="elpub" pub-id-type="custom">communicology-51</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>Статьи</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>Сайнс арт как форма коммуникации науки и инноваций для общества</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Science Art as Science and Innovation Communication to the Society</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Комлева</surname><given-names>Е. А.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Komleva</surname><given-names>E. A.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><email xlink:type="simple">noemail@neicon.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff-1"><aff xml:lang="ru">Университет Маастрихта<country>Россия</country></aff><aff xml:lang="en">Maastricht University<country>Russian Federation</country></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date pub-type="collection"><year>2019</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>14</day><month>07</month><year>2021</year></pub-date><volume>7</volume><issue>4</issue><fpage>169</fpage><lpage>181</lpage><permissions><copyright-statement>Copyright &amp;#x00A9; Комлева Е.А., 2021</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2021</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Комлева Е.А.</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Komleva E.A.</copyright-holder><license license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.</license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://www.communicology.ru/jour/article/view/51">https://www.communicology.ru/jour/article/view/51</self-uri><abstract><p>Популяризация научного знания важна как для личностного роста человека в частности, так и для формирования инновационного общества в целом. Параллельно с развитием науки и техники необходимо вводить и новые способы их коммуникации. Сайнс арт возможно рассматривать в таком качестве, поскольку он известен как направление современного искусства, тесно взаимодействующего с наукой и техникой, при этом являясь доступным для достаточно широкой аудитории. В данной работе разработано авторское определение Сайнс-арта как коммуникационного канала между наукой, технологиями, инновациями (НТИ) и обществом. Мы также проводим авторское эмпирическое исследование, целью которого является понять, может ли он быть таким каналом. По ходу подготовки исследования разрабатывается способ сравнения коммуникационных каналов НТИ между друг другом, используется анализ управленческого опыта. Несмотря на связь Сайнс арта с научной сферой, наше качественное исследование показало, что оно не может в полной мере использоваться для коммуникации науки, поскольку не имеет должного уровня «научности», а также на данный момент не охватывает большой процент аудитории в силу своей специфики. Однако, Сайнс арт, при должной поддержке и при взаимодействии с другими каналами коммуникации науки, может оказывать сильное эмоциональное влияние на аудиторию, что приводит к росту интереса к научной сфере. Эмоциональный посыл Сайнс арта также способен изменить негативные эмоции по отношению к инновациям, которые часто возникают у потенциальных пользователей ввиду их новизны и, зачастую, неопределённых последствий их использования.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="en"><p>Popularization of scientific knowledge is important both for personal growth in particular, and for the formation of an innovative society as a whole. In parallel with the development of science and technology, it is necessary to introduce new ways of communication. Science Art can be considered as such, as it is known as a movement of contemporary art, closely interacting with science and technology, while being accessible to a broad audience. In this paper the author’s definition of Science Art as a communication channel between science, technology, innovation (STI) and society is developed. The author’s empirical research is conducted to see if it can be such channel. In the process of preparing the research, we develop a way of comparing the STI communication channels between each other, the analysis of management experience is used. Despite its connection with the scientific area, our qualitative research has shown that Science art cannot be fully used for science communication, because it does not have a proper level of «scientificity», and does not currently cover a large percentage of the audience due to its specifics. However, Science art, with proper support and interaction with other means of communication of science, can have a strong emotional impact on the audience. This leads to an increase in interest in the scientific field. Science art’s emotional message can also change negative emotions towards innovation, which often arise for potential users due to innovations’ novelty and often uncertain consequences of their use.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>коммуникация науки</kwd><kwd>Сайнс арт</kwd><kwd>современное искусство</kwd><kwd>маркетинг инноваций</kwd><kwd>технологии</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>science communication</kwd><kwd>Science Art</kwd><kwd>contemporary art</kwd><kwd>innovation marketing</kwd><kwd>technologies</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="cit1"><label>1</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Булатов Д. (2009). Искусство и наука в эпоху постбиологии. Калининград: КФ ГЦСИ.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Булатов Д. (2009). Искусство и наука в эпоху постбиологии. Калининград: КФ ГЦСИ.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit2"><label>2</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Aiken M., Hage, J. (1971). The organic organization and innovation. Sociology, 5(1), 63-82.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Aiken M., Hage, J. (1971). The organic organization and innovation. Sociology, 5(1), 63-82.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit3"><label>3</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Barnett P.G., Liston, M.I. (1967). Dimensions and Differentials of Home Economists’ Images of Consumer Roles. The Journal of Consumer Affairs, 79-88.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Barnett P.G., Liston, M.I. (1967). Dimensions and Differentials of Home Economists’ Images of Consumer Roles. The Journal of Consumer Affairs, 79-88.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit4"><label>4</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Burgelman J.C. (2001). How social dynamics influence information society technology: Lessons for innovation policy. In: Social Sciences and Innovation. P. 215-222. Paris: OECD.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Burgelman J.C. (2001). How social dynamics influence information society technology: Lessons for innovation policy. In: Social Sciences and Innovation. P. 215-222. Paris: OECD.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit5"><label>5</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Campbell N.R. (1921). What is Science? London: Methuen.Gilbert S.W. (1991). Model building and a definition of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 28(1), 73-79.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Campbell N.R. (1921). What is Science? London: Methuen.Gilbert S.W. (1991). Model building and a definition of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 28(1), 73-79.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit6"><label>6</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Hutter M., Knoblauch H., Rammert W., Windeler A. (2015). Innovation society today: the reflexive creation of novelty. Historical Social Research, 40(3), 30-47.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Hutter M., Knoblauch H., Rammert W., Windeler A. (2015). Innovation society today: the reflexive creation of novelty. Historical Social Research, 40(3), 30-47.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit7"><label>7</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Owen R., Macnaghten, P., Stilgoe, J. (2012). Responsible research and innovation: From science in society to science for society, with society. Science and public policy, 39(6), 751-760.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Owen R., Macnaghten, P., Stilgoe, J. (2012). Responsible research and innovation: From science in society to science for society, with society. Science and public policy, 39(6), 751-760.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit8"><label>8</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Rogers E.M. (2010). Diffusion of innovations. 4th ed. New York: Simon and Schuster.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Rogers E.M. (2010). Diffusion of innovations. 4th ed. New York: Simon and Schuster.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit9"><label>9</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Roland A. (1992). Secrecy, technology, and war: Greek fire and the defense of Byzantium, 678-1204.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Roland A. (1992). Secrecy, technology, and war: Greek fire and the defense of Byzantium, 678-1204.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit10"><label>10</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Technology and Culture, 33(4), 655-679.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Technology and Culture, 33(4), 655-679.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit11"><label>11</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Willems J. (1991). Science popularization in motion. In: 2nd International Conference on Public communication of Science and Technology (PCST) [access mode]: https://www.pcst.co/archive/paper/1520 (accessed: 04.02.2019).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Willems J. (1991). Science popularization in motion. In: 2nd International Conference on Public communication of Science and Technology (PCST) [access mode]: https://www.pcst.co/archive/paper/1520 (accessed: 04.02.2019).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit12"><label>12</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Zaltman G., Duncan R., Holbek J. (1973). Innovations and organizations. John Wiley &amp; Sons.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Zaltman G., Duncan R., Holbek J. (1973). Innovations and organizations. John Wiley &amp; Sons.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref></ref-list><fn-group><fn fn-type="conflict"><p>The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.</p></fn></fn-group></back></article>
