<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1-3.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.3" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xml:lang="ru"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">communicology</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="ru">Коммуникология</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Communicology</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="ppub">2311-3065</issn><issn pub-type="epub">2311-3332</issn><publisher><publisher-name>МАК</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.21453/2311-3065-2026-14-3-13-21</article-id><article-id custom-type="elpub" pub-id-type="custom">communicology-714</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>МЕДИАКОММУНИКАЦИИ И ЖУРНАЛИСТИКА (ФИЛОСОФСКИЕ НАУКИ)</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>MEDIACOMMUNICATIONS AND JOURNALISM (PHILOSOPHY)</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>Социальные медиа в формировании современной повестки дня: феномен «кота Твикса» и «казуса Долиной»</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Social media in the formation of the contemporary agenda: the phenomenon of «cat Twix» and «incident of Dolina»</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0009-0008-7079-9694</contrib-id><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Балелин</surname><given-names>Е. В.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Balelin</surname><given-names>E. V.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>Балелин Евгений Витальевич, аспирант кафедры коммуникационных технологий,</p><p>119034, г. Москва, ул. Остоженка, дом 38, стр.1.</p></bio><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Balelin Evgeny Vitalievich, Postgraduate Student, Department of Communication Technologies,</p><p>38/1, Ostozhenka, Moscow, 119034.</p></bio><email xlink:type="simple">balelin@mail.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9067-6228</contrib-id><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Шульц</surname><given-names>Э. Э.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Shults</surname><given-names>E. E.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>Шульц Эдуард Эдуардович, канд. ист. наук, доцент, зав. кафедрой коммуникационных технологий,</p><p>119034, г. Москва, ул. Остоженка, дом 38, стр.1.</p></bio><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Shults Eduard Eduardovich, PhD in History, Associate Professor, Head of the Department of Communication Technology,</p><p>38/1, Ostozhenka, Moscow, 119034.</p></bio><email xlink:type="simple">nuap1@ya.ru</email><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff-1"><aff xml:lang="ru"><institution>Московский государственный лингвистический университет</institution><country>Россия</country></aff><aff xml:lang="en"><institution>Moscow State Linguistic University</institution><country>Russian Federation</country></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date pub-type="collection"><year>2026</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>01</day><month>10</month><year>2026</year></pub-date><volume>14</volume><issue>3</issue><fpage>13</fpage><lpage>21</lpage><permissions><copyright-statement>Copyright &amp;#x00A9; Балелин Е.В., Шульц Э.Э., 2026</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2026</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Балелин Е.В., Шульц Э.Э.</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Balelin E.V., Shults E.E.</copyright-holder><license xml:lang="ru" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.</license-p></license><license xml:lang="en" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.</license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://www.communicology.ru/jour/article/view/714">https://www.communicology.ru/jour/article/view/714</self-uri><abstract><p>Данная статья посвящена функционированию двух теоретических концепций медиакоммуникаций формирования повестки дня и гейткипинга, генетически связанных друг с другом, на современном этапе развития российского общества. Актуальность обусловлена тем, что проблема формирования повестки дня сегодня приобретает принципиально иные контуры, формирование повестки дня испытывает давление социальных сетей и, в первую очередь, каналов политической направленности, при этом, сами эти каналы подвержены процессам гейткипинга и подпадают под влияние сформированной повестки дня. В данной статье анализируются два ярких примера 2024 года, долго определявших повестку дня, «история кота Твикса» и «казус Долиной», –демонстрирующие формирование общественной повестки, которая перетекает в медийную, политическую повестку и становится повесткой дня в российском обществе на достаточно долгий период, и которые, в том числе, демонстрируют симбиоз в работе СМИ и социальных медиа в формировании повестки дня. Резонанс общественного мнения на такие события ведет к проявлению протеста, выражающегося в критике конкретных виновников, которая сказывается на негативизации государственных структур и, возможно, власти в целом. Результатом, с одной стороны, становится каналирование протеста, а с другой стороны формирование единых повесток: общественной, медийной и политической и общей повестки дня, а также следующее за этим оперативное изменение общественно-политических отношений, отвечающее полностью или частично запросу на восстановление принципа справедливости.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="en"><p>This article is devoted to the functioning of two theoretical concepts of media communications agenda formation and gatekeeping, genetically related to each other, at the current stage of development of Russian society. The relevance is due to the fact that the problem of forming the agenda today is acquiring fundamentally different contours, the formation of the agenda is under pressure from social networks and, first of all, political channels, while these channels themselves are subject to gatekeeping processes and fall under the influence of the formed agenda. This article analyzes two striking examples of 2024 that have long defined the agenda «the story of the cat Twix» and «incident of Dolina», which demonstrate the formation of a public agenda that flows into the media, political agenda and becomes the agenda in Russian society for a fairly long period, and which, among other things, demonstrate symbiosis in the work of the media and social media in shaping the agenda. The resonance of public opinion on such events leads to a manifestation of protest, expressed in criticism of specific culprits, which affects the negativization of state structures and, possibly, the authorities as a whole. The result, on the one hand, is the channeling of protest, and on the other hand, the formation of unified agendas: public, media and political and common agendas as well as the subsequent operational change in socio-political relations, which meets in whole or in part the request for the restoration of the principle of justice.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>повестка дня</kwd><kwd>гейткипинг</kwd><kwd>социальные медиа</kwd><kwd>кот Твикс</kwd><kwd>«казус Долиной»</kwd><kwd>Telegram-каналы</kwd><kwd>медиакоммуникации</kwd><kwd>социальный протест</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>agenda</kwd><kwd>gatekeeping</kwd><kwd>social media</kwd><kwd>cat Twix</kwd><kwd>“incident of Dolina”</kwd><kwd>Telegram channels</kwd><kwd>media communications</kwd><kwd>social protest</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><title>References</title><ref id="cit1"><label>1</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Балелин Е.В. (2025). Трансформация процесса гейткипинга в политических коммуникациях, обусловленная развитием социальных медиа // Вопросы медиабизнеса. Т. 4. № 2. С. 39-44.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Balelin E.V. (2025). Transformation of the gatekeeping process in political communications caused by the development of social media. Issues of media business. Vol. 4. No. 2, рр. 39-44. (in Rus.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit2"><label>2</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Козер Л. (2000). Функции социального конфликта /Пер. с англ. М.: Идея-Пресс, Дом интеллектуальной книги.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Barzilai-Nahon K. (2008). Toward a theory of network gatekeeping: A framework for exploring information control. Journal of the American society for information science and technology. Vol. 59. No. 9, рр. 1493-1512.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit3"><label>3</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Липпман У. (2025). Общественное мнение. М: Издательство АСТ.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Chumikov et al. (2025a) Telegram as a communication platform in the presidential elections in 2024. Kazan science. № 4, рр. 732-736. (in Rus.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit4"><label>4</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Сербина Г. Н. (2015). Роль Интернета в формировании новостной повестки дня: критический анализ теории agenda-setting. // Вестник Томского государственного университета, № 397. С. 56-59.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Chumikov et al. (2025b). Network influencers in business and politics as gatekeepers of the media communication field. Sign: the problem field of media education. № 2 (56), рр. 36-45. (in Rus.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit5"><label>5</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Чумиков и др. (2025b). Сетевые инфлюенсеры в бизнесе и политике как гейткиперы медиакоммуникационного поля // Знак: проблемное поле медиаобразования. № 2 (56). С. 36-45.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Coser L. (2000). Functions of social conflict. M.: Idea-Press, House of Intellectual Books. (in Rus.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit6"><label>6</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Чумиков и др. (2025а) Telegram как коммуникационная площадка на выборах президента РФ в 2024 г. // Казанская наука. № 4. С. 732-736.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Coser L.A. (1970). The Termination of Conflict. Readings in Social Evolution and Development / Ed. by Eisenstadt S.L. N.-Y.: Elsevier Science &amp; Technology, рр. 141-151.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit7"><label>7</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Шульц Э. Э. (2024). Медийные принципы формирования повестки дня в современной России // Коммуникационный вектор 2024. Материалы симпозиума: сборник статей /под ред. А. Н. Чумикова, Э. Э. Шульца. М.: Блок-Принт. С. 241-251.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Golan G.J. (2014). Agenda-setting in a 2.0 World: New Agendas in Communication. Journal of Broadcasting &amp; Electronic Media. Vol. 58(3), рр. 476–477.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit8"><label>8</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Шульц Э.Э. (2025). Сов ременные медиакоммуникации: управление доверием к информации // Журналист. Социальные коммуникации. № 2. C. 65-68.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Kim S.T. &amp; Lee, Y.H. (2006). New functions of Internet mediated agenda-setting: Agenda-rippling and reversed agenda-setting. Korean Journal of Journalism &amp; Communication Studies. Vol.50 (3), рр. 175–205.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit9"><label>9</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Шульц Э.Э. (2026). Телеграм-каналы в формировании повестки дня в современной России // Русская политология. 2026. № 1 (38). С. 31-39.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Lewin K. (1943). Forces behind food habits and methods of change. Bulletin of the national Research Council. Vol. 108. No. 1043, рр. 35-65.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit10"><label>10</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Barzilai Nahon K. (2008). Toward a theory of network gatekeeping: A framework for exploring information control // Journal of the American society for information science and technology. Vol. 59. No. 9, рр. 1493-1512.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Lewin K. (1947). Frontiers in group dynamics: Concept, method and reality in social science; social equilibria and social change. Human relations. Vol. 1. No. 1, рр. 5-41.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit11"><label>11</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Coser L.A. (1970). The Termination of Conflict // Readings in Social Evolution and Development / Ed. by Eisenstadt S.L. N.-Y.: Elsevier Science &amp; Technology, рр. 141-151.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Lippman U. (2025). Public opinion. Moscow. AST Publishing House. (In Rus.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit12"><label>12</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Golan G.J. (2014). Agenda-setting in a 2.0 World: New Agendas in Communication // Journal of Broadcasting &amp; Electronic Media. Vol. 58(3), рр. 476-477.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">McCombs M.E., Shaw D.L. (1972). The agenda-setting function of mass media. Public Opinion Quarterly. Vol. 36, рр. 176-187.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit13"><label>13</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Kim S.T., Lee Y.H. (2006). New functions of Internet mediated agenda-setting: Agenda-rippling and reversed agenda-setting // Korean Journal of Journalism &amp; Communication Studies. No.50 (3), рр. 175-205.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Serbina G. N. (2015). The role of the Internet in shaping the news agenda: a critical analysis of the agenda-setting theory. Bulletin of Tomsk State University. No. 397, рр. 56-59. (In Rus.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit14"><label>14</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Lewin K. (1943). Forces behind food habits and methods of change // Bulletin of the national Research Council. Vol. 108. No. 1043, рр. 35-65.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Shoemaker P. J. (2020). Gatekeeping and Journalism. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Communication. Retrieved 01 March 2026. URL: https://oxfordre.com/communication/view/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228613.001.0001/acrefore-9780190228613-e-819.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit15"><label>15</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Lewin K. (1947). Frontiers in group dynamics: Concept, method and reality in social science; social equilibria and social change // Human relations. Vol. 1. No. 1, рр. 5-41.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Shoemaker P. J., Reese S. D. (1996). Mediating the message. White Plains, NY: Longman, рр. 781-795.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit16"><label>16</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">McCombs M.E., Shaw D.L. (1972). The agenda-setting function of mass media // Public Opinion Quarterly. Vol. 36, рр. 176-187.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Shoemaker P.J., Vos T.P. (2009). Gatekeeping Theory. New York: Routledge.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit17"><label>17</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Singer J.B. (2006). Stepping Back from the Gate: Online Newspaper Editors and the Co-Production of Content in Campaign 2004. Journalism &amp; Mass Communication Quarterly. No. 83(2), рр. 265-280.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Shults E.E. (2024). Media principles of agenda formation in modern Russia. Communication vector 2024. Materials of the symposium: collection of articles. edited by A. N. Chumikov, E. E. Shults. Moscow. Blok-Print, рр. 241-251. (in Rus.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit18"><label>18</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Shoemaker P.J., Reese S.D. (1996). Mediating the message. White Plains. New York: Longman, рр. 781-795.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Shults E.E. (2025). Contemporary media communications: managing trust in information. Journalist. Social communications. № 2, рр. 65-68. (in Rus.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit19"><label>19</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Shoemaker P.J., Vos T.P. (2009). Gatekeeping Theory. New York: Routledge.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Shults E.E. (2026). Telegram channels in the formation of the agenda in modern Russia. Russian Political Science. 2026. № 1 (38), рр. 31-39. (In Rus.).</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit20"><label>20</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">Shoemaker P.J. (2020) Gatekeeping and Journalism // Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Communication. URL: https://oxfordre.com/communication/view/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228613.001.0001/acrefore-9780190228613-e-819 (дата обращения 01.03.2026).</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">Singer, J. B. (2006). Stepping Back from the Gate: Online Newspaper Editors and the CoProduction of Content in Campaign 2004. Journalism &amp; Mass Communication Quarterly. No. 83(2), рр. 265-280.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref><ref id="cit21"><label>21</label><citation-alternatives><mixed-citation xml:lang="ru">White D.M. (1950) The “gate keeper”: A case study in the selection of news // Journalism quarterly. Vol. 27. No. 4, рр. 383-390.</mixed-citation><mixed-citation xml:lang="en">White D. M. (1950). The «gate keeper»: A case study in the selection of news. Journalism quarterly. Vol. 27. No. 4, рр. 383-390.</mixed-citation></citation-alternatives></ref></ref-list><fn-group><fn fn-type="conflict"><p>The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.</p></fn></fn-group></back></article>
