Political Communications in Network Electoral Clusters: cyber technologies in the formation of a network party brand
https://doi.org/10.21453/2311-3065-2021-9-3-145-154
Abstract
The article represents the results of the analysis of network electoral clusters as a phenomenon of cyber parties and political technologies in the electronic media environment in the context of the problem of consolidating political power. Pointing to the modern specifics of the electoral processes and institutions of modern Russia, the author justifies the movement of protest activity and manipulation by the electorate into the electronic space. Based on the review of the relevant publications, the author concludes that the analysis of network electoral clusters, as well as technologies for political mobilization on the Internet, represents an important source and a problematic field for political scientists working on the problem of consolidating political power. For a democratic solution to the problem, it is necessary to timely identify and take into account protest activity in the electronic media environment, monitor and prevent the spread of potentially dangerous content using the technical and communicative resources of social networks. At the same time, the solution of the problem is not limited to countermeasures in the Internet space, the introduction of censorship, etc. It lies in the plane of improving the interaction of society and power, the electoral legislation, the party system and the personal political competence of citizens, their ability to assess the reliability of information, determine their political preferences, focusing not only on the political image of parties (party brand), but also the real content of their activities and programs.
About the Author
A. V. OsipovRussian Federation
Osipov Alexander Vladimirovich – CandSc (Pol.), judge
344082, Rostov-on-Don, Pushkinskaya str., 9
References
1. Akopov G.L. (2013). Internet and Politics: Modernizing the Political System Based on Innovative Political Internet Communications. M.: KnoRus (In Rus.).
2. Brodovskaya E.V., Dombrovskaya A.Yu. (2021). Competition of information flows of Russian political parties (2020 – 2021): main results of socio-media predictive analytics: https://event.wciom.ru/file/report_2021/115_21052021094245.pdf (In Rus.).
3. Bull P., Noordhuizen M., Wells, P. ed. (2000). The Mistiming of Applause in Political Speeches. Journal of Language and Social Psychology. Vol. 19. No. 3. P. 275-294. doi:10.1177/0261927X00019003001. ISSN 0261-927X.
4. Johnston R. (2006). Party Identification: Unmoved Mover or Sum of Preferences? Annual Review of Political Science. No. 9. P. 329-351.
5. Kwak H., Lee С., Hosung P, Moon S. (2010). What is Twitter, a Social Network or a News Media?. DOI: 10.1145/1772690.1772751. ISBN 978-1-60558-799-8.
6. Lupu N. (2011). Party Brands in Crisis: Partisanship, Brand Dilution, and the Breakdown of Political Parties in Latin America. PhD dissertation, Princeton University.
7. Margetts H. (2001). The cyber party. In: School of Public Policy. Paper to workshop ‘The Causes and Consequences of Organizational Innovation in European Political Parties’, ECPR Joint Sessions of Workshops. Grenoble.
8. Miller A., Klobucar T. (2000). The Development of Party Identification in Post-Soviet Societies. American Journal of Political Science. Vol. 44. No. 4. P. 667-685.
9. Morton R., Williams К. (2010). From Nature to the Lab: The Methodology of Experimental Political Science and the Study of Causality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
10. Pisarchuk D.I. (2014). A network party brand as a phenomenon of a new extrasocial society. Bulletin of the Russian State University for the Humanities. Series: Political Science. History. International relations. No. 1 (123). P. 273-279 (In Rus.).
11. Sharkov F.I. (2014). Information and communication paradigm of the development of Russian statehood. Communicology. Vol. 3. No. 1. P. 111-118 (In Rus.).
12. Sharkov F.I. (2016). Visualization of political media space. Polis. Political Studies. No. 5. P. 97- 107 (In Rus.).
13. Sharkov F.I., Nazarova E.A., Zhukov A.V. (2020). Digital literacy of the population and network communications: a sociological dimension. Communicology. Vol. 8. No. 3. P. 52-62 (In Rus.).
14. Standage T. (2011). The People Formerly Known as the Audience. Bulletins from the Future. Economist. No. 400 (8471).
15. Wicks R., Bradley A., Blackburn G., Fields T. (2011). Tracking the Blogs: An Evaluation of Attacks, Acclaims, and Rebuttals Presented on Political Blogs During the 2008 Presidential Election. American Behavioral Scientist. Vol. 55. No. 6. P. 651-666.
16. Zyryanov S.G. (2008). Transformation of the political space: from political parties to electoral clusters (from the experience of the USA and Russia). Vestnik TSU. No. 4. P. 24-29 (In Rus.).
Review
For citations:
Osipov A.V. Political Communications in Network Electoral Clusters: cyber technologies in the formation of a network party brand. Communicology. 2021;9(3):145-154. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21453/2311-3065-2021-9-3-145-154