Online communication in the educational environment of Russia and Germany: functional and dysfunctional effects of digitalization

Nowadays, the ability of the higher education system to adapt to external conditions is facing the challenge of online transformation and digitalization against the background of changes in the format of social relations in the direction of greater pluralism, demassification of information sources, channels and recipients. The relevance of the study lies in the need to assess the consequences of the transition to online communication of teachers and students in order to identify new functional / dysfunctional effects of digitization of the educational environment. The paper represents the results of an online survey (spring – summer of 2020), when the pandemic of the new coronavirus led to the transition to distance learning. The survey was conducted among students of Russian and German universities to identify the attitude of students to online education. Possible unintentional consequences of digitalization of the educational environment were identified. On the basis respondents’ answers, the authors have analyzed emotional attitude of Russian and German students to the compulsory transition to online learning as well as their assessments of its positive and negative aspects. The authors provide ratio of the advantages and disadvantages of online learning in the perception of Russian and German students, highlight some side effects of online communication between teachers and students, as well as the concerns of students caused by the transition to a new communication format. According to students of Russian and German universities, online communication is not beneficial for the quality of education. The increased time spent in front of the computer screen is considered harmful. Besides, students in both countries are concerned with the weakening of social ties and the loss of social contacts.

1. Baudrillard J. (2015). Simulacra and simulation / Transl. A. Kachalova. M.: POSTUM (In Rus.).

2. Bustillos J. (2017). The Digital Divide. Neoliberal Imperatives and Education. In: Isaacs S., ed. European Social Problems. Routledge: London and New York.

3. Chinoy E.D., Duffy J.F., Czeisler C.A. (2018). Unrestricted evening use of light-emitting tablet computers delays self-selected bedtime and disrupts circadian timing and alertness. Physiological Reports. No. 6(10). e13692 [эл. ресурс]: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29845764/.

4. Kravchenko S.A. (2019a). Complicated Metamorphoses: Sociological Searches for Answers to Challenges. M.: Znanie–Sila (In Rus.).

5. Kravchenko S.A. (2019b). Sociology on the move: the demand for the humanistic digital turn. RUDN Journal of Sociology. No. 3 (19). P. 397-405.

6. Manikovskaya M.A. (2019). Digitalization of education: challenges to traditional norms and principles of morality. Power and management in the East of Russia. No. 2 (87). P. 100-106 (In Rus.).

7. Marks K. (2000) Economic and philosophical manuscripts of 1844 (transl.) In: Sociology. Col. of works. M.: KANON-press; Kuchkovo Pole. P. 177-323 (In Rus.).

8. Nikitin A.P. (2018). McDonaldization of higher education. Ideas. No. 3 (37). Vol. 2. P. 221-232 (In Rus.).

9. Orlova L.V. (2016). Intellectual passivity and digital dementia. In: Digital society as a cultural and historical context of human development. Kolomna: State Social and Humanitarian University. P. 308-310 (In Rus.).

10. Pakhar L.I., Petrova R.A. (2021). Alienation: theoretical understanding of the problem. Philosophskaya Mysl. No. 8. P. 78-91 (In Rus.).

11. Prensky M. (2001). Digital Natives, Digital Immigrants. On the Horizon. Vol. 9. No. 5. P. 1-6.

12. Seliverstova N.A. (2020). Imitation of educational practices in the field of higher education. Sociological studies. No. 3 (46). P. 71-77 (In Rus.).

13. Sharkov F.I., Nazarova E.A., Zhukov A.V. (2020). Digital literacy of the population and network communications: a sociological dimension. Communicology. Vol. 8. No. 3. P. 52-62 (In Rus.).

14. Sharkov F.I., Omelchuk I.S. (2021). Digital technologies: advantages and problems of development and cybercrime. Communicology: electronic scientific journal. Vol. 6. No. 2. P. 33-43 (In Rus.).

15. Simmel G. (2002). Communication. An example of pure, or formal, sociology. In: Theoretical Sociology: Anthology in 2 vols. Moscow: University (In Rus.).

16. Sorokin P.A. (2009). The crisis of our time. Social and cultural overview. M.: ISPI RAN (In Rus.).

17. Toshchenko Zh.T. (2020). Society of Trauma: Between Evolution and Revolution (An Experience of Theoretical and Empirical Analysis). Moscow: Ves Mir (In Rus.).

18. Zarubina N.N. (2020). Unintended sociocultural consequences of digitalization: a new quality of formal rationalization, risks of desocialization and dehumanization. In: Traditional and new social conflicts in the XXI century: XIV International Scientific Conference «Sorokin Readings – 2020». Collection of materials. Moscow: MAX Press. P. 1356-1358 (In Rus.).

19. Zborovskiy G.E. (2012). Educational knowledge as a problem of sociology. Sociological studies. No. 2. P. 12-20 (In Rus.).