On Weakest Links of Communication in Corruption Control
https://doi.org/10.21453/2311-3065-2018-6-1-143-154
Abstract
The paper is based on sociological survey survey conducted by the Laboratory of problems of increasing the efficiency of state and municipal management of the SouthRussian Institute of Management – branch of Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration. The survey has been carried out in a number of constituent entities of Russia in November-December 2017 in preparation for the Roundtable with international participation “Problems of countering corruption in public and municipal administration and ways of their solution in modern Russia” (February 16-17, 2018, Rostov-on-Don). The authors examine some trends and results that have been marked in counteraction to corruption in recent years, identify the ‘weak links’ in communicative activity that affect the effectiveness of corruption control, and suggest the possible ways to improve the effectiveness of anti-corruption activity.
As a result of this analysis, the authors come to the conclusion that increasing the effectiveness of communicative activities to counter corruption depends on the organization of the depth of research into the nature of corruption and the forms of its manifestation in contemporary Russian society. It seems that in modern conditions, along with the repressive method of suppression of corruption crimes, the strategic direction of combating corruption should be to identify and eliminate the causes and factors that form corruption risks.
About the Authors
S. A. Vorontsov
Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration (RANEPA)
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Sergey Alekseevich Vorontsov, professor, Dr. Sc. (Law), Professor at Department of the Procedural Law
119571, Moscow, Vernadsky av., 82
A. V. Ponedelkov
Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration (RANEPA)
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Alexander Vasilievich Ponedelkov, professor, Dr. Sc. (Pol.), head of department of political science and ethnopolicy
119571, Moscow, Vernadsky av., 82
References
1. Ivanov P.I., Shegabudinov R.A. (2017). Economic and corruption crime and its latency as an object of criminological research. Bulletin of Economic Security [el. source]: https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/ekonomicheskaya-i-korruptsionnaya-prestupnost-i-ee-latentnost-kak-obektkriminologicheskogo-izucheniya (In Rus.).
2. Lapshin A.O. (2017). Once again about power. Power. No. 12. P. 180-185.
3. Shannon С.Е. (1963). Selected papers on Information Theory of Cybernetics. Ed. R.L. Dobrushina, O.B. Lupanov, A.N. Kolmogorov. P. Moscow: Foreign Literature Publishing House (In Rus.).
4. Sharkov F.I. (2013). The constants of goodwill: style, publicity, reputation, image and brand of the company. Moscow: Dashkov and Co (In Rus.).
5. Sharkov F.I., Sedov A.O. (2017). Brand promotion through new information and communication technologies (for example, Russian airlines). Communicology (Russia). Vol. 5. No. 6. 2017. P. 86-101 (In Rus.).
6. Silkin V.V. (2017). Information and Communication Management in the Political Space of Society. Communicology (Russia). Vol. 5. No. 6. P. 15-16 (In Rus.).
7. Suleymanova Sh.S. (2009). Ethnic factor in the contemporary political development of Russia. Bulletin of the Adyghe State University: Philosophy, History, Sociology, Jurisprudence, Political Science, Culturology. No. 2. P. 115 (In Rus.).
8. Suleymanova Sh.S. (2015). The Image of a Muslim in Federal Media: myths about ‘outsiders’ and ‘enemies of Russia’ as a threat to the unity of the nation. Islam in the Modern World. Vol. 11. No. 1. P. 135 (In Rus.).
9. Habermas J. (2002). Moral consciousness and communicative action. SPb.: Nauka. P. 173-286 (In Rus.).
10. Habermas J. (2008). Relationship to the world and the rational aspects of actions in four sociological concepts of action // Sociological review. Vol. 7. No.1. P. 3-25 (In Rus.).
11. Habermas J. (1984). What is universal pragmatics? Communication and the evolution of society. Polity Press. P. 1-68.
12. Toffler A. (1984). On the threshold of the future. The American model: with the future in conflict. Moscow. P. 33 (In Rus.).
13. Fatyanov AA (2001). Legal basis of information security in the Russian Federation. Moscow. P. 95 (In Rus.).
Review
For citations:
Vorontsov S.A., Ponedelkov A.V. On Weakest Links of Communication in Corruption Control. Communicology. 2018;6(1):143-154. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21453/2311-3065-2018-6-1-143-154
Views:
144
Email this article 
