The Role of Screen Technologies In the Formation of a New Culture of Emotions and Feelings
https://doi.org/10.21453/2311-3065-2022-10-3-116-122
Abstract
The article is devoted to the analysis of the phenomena of postmodern culture, confirming the validity of the concept of “society of experiences”, and describes the processes of increasing the significance and value of the affective in all spheres of culture, as well as the results of these processes. The author analyses the hypothesis of the paradox of combining individual anhedonia and an increased degree of social and textual emotionality is discussed, and gives interpretation to the theses expressed by modern sociologists and philosophers G. Schulze, A. Requitz, E. Illuz, P.Y. Aronson. The article is based on a philosophical and anthropological study of emotions that deal with sensations and modern practices of behavioral, textual, aesthetic design of affects. In contrast to the widespread concept of determining the emotionalization of culture solely by economic factors, the author of the article expands the list of reasons and conditions for emotions to enter the epicenter of socio-cultural processes. As a conclusion, the transformation of emotional styles in culture that occurred under the influence of the expansion of screen technologies is stated, and modernity is represented as an era of “emotionalization” and “psychologization”.
About the Author
Y. V. LobanovaRussian Federation
Lobanova Yuliya Vladimirovna – CandSc (Philos.), associate professor of the Department for humanities
107023, Russia, Moscow, Bolshaya Semyonovskaya str., 38
References
1. Afanasov N. B. (2022). Love. Emotional Capitalism – Craft Economy? Galactica Media: Journal of Media Studies. Vol. 4. No. 2. P. 183-194 (In Rus.).
2. Aronson P. (2020). Love: Do it yourself. How we became managers of our feelings. M.: Individuum (In Rus.).
3. Aronson P., Budraitis I., Velikodvorskaya E. et al. (2021). Complex feelings. Phrasebook of the new reality: from abuse to toxicity / ed. P. Aronson. M.: Individuum (In Rus.).
4. Debord G. (1969). La societе du spectacle. Gallimard. Paris.
5. Illouz E. (2012). Why Love hurts: a sociological explanation. Cambridge: Polity Press.
6. Inishev I.N. (2020) Distributed imagery: imaginative practices of contemporary culture. ΠΡΑΞΗMΑ. Journal of Visual Semiotics. No. 1. P. 31-46 (In Rus.).
7. Ocheretyaniy K.A. (2021). Interface: disciplinary space or territory of possibilities? In: Revolution and Evolution: Models of Development in Science, culture, society: Proceedings of the III All-Russian Scientific Conference, Nizhny Novgorod, November 26-28, 2021 / Russian Society of History and Philosophy of Science. Moscow: Russian Society of History and Philosophy of Science. P. 218-222 (In Rus.).
8. Reckwitz A. (2017). Die Gesellschaft der Singularitäten. Zum Strukturwandel der Moderne. Suhrkamp, Berlin.
9. Romanenko Y.M. (2003). Showization. Projective Philosophical Dictionary: New terms and concepts / ed. G.L. Tulchinsky and M.N. Epstein. St. Petersburg: Aleteya (In Rus.).
10. Saenko N.R., Shcheglov I.V. (2012). Routines of implantation of the screen in life of the modern person. Kaspijskij region: politika, ekonomika, kul’tura. No. 4 (33). P. 275-281 (In Rus.).
11. Schulze G. (2005). Erlebnisgesellschaft: Kultursoziologie der Gegenwart. Campus Verlag, Frankfurt / New York.
12. Shcheglova L. V. (2003). The meaning of ethics in the era of aestheticism. Izvestiya VSPU. No. 2 (03). P. 3-9 (In Rus.).
Review
For citations:
Lobanova Y.V. The Role of Screen Technologies In the Formation of a New Culture of Emotions and Feelings. Communicology. 2022;10(3):116-122. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21453/2311-3065-2022-10-3-116-122