Towards the Conceptualization of Media Inclusion: managerial aspect
https://doi.org/10.21453/2311-3065-2022-10-3-137-146
Abstract
The article suggests the author’s approach to the conceptualization of the concept of “media inclusion” in the managerial aspect, which is dictated, firstly, by the absence of this term as a whole and separately of the concept of “inclusion” in domestic media studies, and, secondly, by the presence of a large body of work on the inclusion of certain types of media in the social space, which requires its own understanding. The author (1) reveals the sources of the emergence and specificity of new media in the framework of managerial discourse; (2) notes the features of the use of the concept of inclusion in the scientific lexicon; (3) shows the the specifics of considering inclusion in the media and the effectiveness of media in domestic and foreign science; and (4) conceptualizes the media inclusion from managerial the point. The methodological basis of the research is the work of F.I. Sharkov and V.V. Silkin on the genesis of the sociology of media space, which presents sociological tools for the study of the inclusion of media in social space and media space as a set of fields that unite individuals in the social information space. The author’s concept of media inclusion is based on a comprehensive study of media inclusion as a paradigm in already existing social processes at the management level.
Keywords
media,
inclusion,
media inclusion,
new media,
social space,
media space,
social processes,
management
About the Author
T. V. Andriyanova
Kursk State University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Andriyanova Tatyana Vladimirovna – CandSc (Law), associate professor at the Depatment of Sociology
305004, Russia, Kursk, Radishchev st., 29.
References
1. Aarseth E. (1997). Cybertext: Perspectives on Ergodic Literature. UK: Johns Hopkins University Press.
2. Andrejevic K. (2003). The webcam subculture and the digital enclosure. In: Couldry N., McCarthy A. (eds.) MediaSpace: Place, scale and culture in a media age. London / New York: Routledge.
3. Andriyanova T.V. (2019). Research potential of the theory of coordinated management of meaning formation in the management of social processes. In: Global challenges and regional development in the mirror of sociological measurements: materials of the IV Intern. scientific-practical. Internet Conf., Vologda, March 25 – April 2, 2019. Vologda: VolRC RAS. P. 184-189 (In Rus.).
4. Andriyanova T.V. (2021a). “Public dialogue” and its managerial perspectives in the communication theory of B.W. Pierce and V.E. Kronen. Communicology. Vol. 9. No. 1. P. 151-159. DOI: 10.21453 / 2311-3065-2021-9-1-151-159 (In Rus.).
5. Andriyanova T.V. (2021c). Communication Theory as a Coherent Area at the Turn of the 20th-21st Centuries in the Context of Management Influence. Wellbeing Vectors: Economics and Society. No. 2 (41). P. 1-13. DOI: 10.18799/26584956/2021/2(41)/1113 (In Rus.).
6. Baudrillard J. (2006) Consumer society. His myths and structures (transl.). M.: Republic; Cultural Revolution (In Rus.).
7. Bolter J. D., Grusin R. (2000). Remidiation. Understandig New Media. N.Y.: MIT Press.
8. Castels M. (2000). The Information Age: Economy, Society and Culture / trans. from English; under the scientific editorship of O.I. Shkaratan. M.: Higher School of Economics (In Rus.).
9. Darley A. (2000). Visual digital culture. N.Y.: Routledge.
10. Dewdney A., Ride P. (2006). The New Media Handbook. N.Y.: Routledge.
11. Gitelman L., Pingree G.B. (2003). New Media 1740-1915. Cambridge: MIT Press.
12. Grau O. (2003). Virtual art: from illusion to immersion. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press.
13. Hall S. (1997). Representation: cultural representation and signifying practices. London: OU/Sage.
14. Hansen M. (2004). New Philosophy for New Media. Cambridge, Massachusetts London, England: The MIT Press.
15. Hayles N.K. (2002). Writing Machines. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
16. Jenkins H. (2006). Сonvergence Culture: Where Old and New Media Collide. N.Y.: University Press.
17. Kadyrova G.H. (2019). Categorical dynamics of media effectiveness: socio-regulatory and informational-genre aspects: author’s thesis. Krasnodar (In Rus.).
18. Kellner D. (1995). Media and Culture. London and N.Y.: Routledgeю
19. Kittler F. (1997). Literature, Media, Information Systems. Amsterdam: OPA.
20. Lessig L. (2001). The Future of Ideas: The Fate of the Commons in a Connected World. N.Y.: Random House.
21. Lister M., Dovey J., Giddings S., Grant I., Kelly K. (2009). New Media: A Critical Introduction. N.Y.:Routledge.
22. Livingstone S. (2005). People living in the new media age: rethinking «audiences» and «users». Oxford Internet Institute / MIT Workshop: New Approaches to Research on the Social Implications of Emerging Technologies,
23. Manovich L. (2002). The Language of New Media. Cambrige, London.
24. Marvin C. (1988). When Old Technologies Were New: Thinking About Electric Communication in the Late Nineteenth Century. N.Y.: Oxford University Press.
25. Nakamura L. (2007). Digitizing Race: Visual Cultures of the Internet. Univ. of Minnesota Press.
26. Sharkov F.I., Silkin V.V. (2021). The genesis of the sociology of the media space. Bulletin of the RUDN. Series: Sociology. Vol. 21 No. 3. P. 557-566.
27. Spielmann Y. (2012). Hybrid Culture: Japanese Media Arts in Dialogue with the West. N.Y.: MIT Press.
28. Webster F. (1999). Theories of the Information Society. London: Routledge.
Review
For citations:
Andriyanova T.V. Towards the Conceptualization of Media Inclusion: managerial aspect. Communicology. 2022;10(3):137-146. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21453/2311-3065-2022-10-3-137-146
Views:
231
Email this article 
