Fairytale Character as a Brand: communication strategies of national identification
https://doi.org/10.21453/2311-3065-2022-10-4-61-69
Abstract
The article is devoted to the analysis of fairytale character and its functioning in the context of globalization. Globalization process intensifies reverse tendency: enhancement of tradition and social community integration based on the values of national identity. Fairytale characters are regarded as archetypal representations, which form national identity and traditionality. The linguistic combination of words “fairytale character” and “brand” is regarded as a social spheres interpenetration marker. Fairytale character functions within social, politic, economic spheres, which are diffuse to each other. Hence, a fairytale character starts to be not only cultural symbol, but a marketing strategy object and ideologic platform for social community integration. The projects, the main characters of which are fairy tale characters, are considered as very essential for social communities integrity preservation process. Government, mass media and communication and business have a significant role to play in such projects development. It is shown that, since modern society is characterized by a diffuse interpenetration of social spheres, it can be assumed that a fairy tale character can function as a cultural and as a marketing project.
About the Author
I. S. IsmailovaRussian Federation
Ismailova Inna Shamilievna – postgraduate student of the Intstitute of Public Administration and Civil Service
119571, Moscow, Vernadsky ave, 82
References
1. Aaker D. (2008). Building strong brands (transl.), 2nd ed. M.: Grebennikov (In Rus.).
2. Anholt S., Hildreth J. (2010). Brand America. Mother of all brands (transl.). M.: Good book (In Rus.).
3. Baudrillard J. (2000). Transparency of Evil / Transl. L. Lyubarskaya, E. Markovskaya. M.: Dobrosvet (In Rus.).
4. Domnin V.N. (2009). Brand identity is a key concept of brand management. Brand management. No. 5. P. 266-282 (In Rus.).
5. Kotler F. (2007) Fundamentals of Marketing Short Course. M.: Williams (In Rus.).
6. Lezhnina V.E. (2021). Functioning of the lexeme “brand” in the modern Russian language: terminology and determinology. Bulletin of the Moscow State Linguistic University. Humanitarian sciences. No. 13 (855). P. 181-192 (In Rus.).
7. McLuhan G.M. (2013). The Gutenberg Galaxy (transl.). M.: Academic project (In Rus.).
8. Perfilieva N.V., Zhikulina K.P. (2019). The “Masha and the Bear” Phenomenon in Russian and Foreign Mass Media. Issues of Theory and Practice of Journalism. Vol. 8. No. 1. P. 164-178 (In Rus.).
9. Sazonova E.V. (2017). Festival as a holiday brand. Uchenye zapiski (AGAKI). No. 2 (12). P. 86-88 (In Rus.).
10. Solovieva D.V., Orlova M.S. (2022). Designing brand identity for cultural and historical festivals. Practical Marketing. No. 4 (301). P. 3-9 (In Rus.).
11. Ushakov D.N. (2008) Big explanatory dictionary of the Russian language: modern edition. M.: Dom slavyanskoj knigi (In Rus.).
12. Sharkov F.I. (2021). A new paradigm for the implementation of the concept of a social state in the context of globalization. Social and labor research. No. 43(2). P.132-140 (In Rus.).
13. Sharkov F.I., Yakushina O.I. (2020). Conceptual models of intercultural relations in the process of forming the identities of individuals and groups. Monitoring public opinion: economic and social changes. No. 2. P. 385-404 (In Rus.).
14. Engels F. (1982). Dialectics of nature / Transl. K. Dutt. 9th ed. M.: Progress (In Rus.).
15. Jung K.G. (1991). Archetype and symbol (transl.). M.: Renaissance (In Rus.).
Review
For citations:
Ismailova I.S. Fairytale Character as a Brand: communication strategies of national identification. Communicology. 2022;10(4):61-69. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21453/2311-3065-2022-10-4-61-69