The concepts of social solidarity and social partnership as prerequisites for the formation of corporate culture
https://doi.org/10.21453/2311-3065-2023-11-2-115-127
Abstract
This research is devoted to the analysis of the concepts of social solidarity and social partnership as prerequisites for the formation of corporate culture of organizations. Currently, the concept of social solidarity is an important tool for ensuring social justice and sustainable development of society. The concept of social partnership, in turn, allows employers and employees to cooperate effectively in solving various socio-economic problems. The study analyzes the methodological consolidation of the concepts of social solidarity and social partnership, and also presents their criticism. The author conducted a comparative analysis demonstrating the advantages and disadvantages of each of the concepts under consideration. Based on the results obtained during the study, the principles of implementing the concepts of social partnership and social solidarity in the formation of the corporate culture of the organization were developed. In conclusion, the author concludes that the development of concepts of social solidarity and the establishment of social partnership in the organization is a prerequisite for the successful formation of a corporate culture that contributes to improving the efficiency of the organization and employee satisfaction.
About the Author
N. V. Tarutin
BCS Fintech
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Tarutin Nikita Vadimovich – Lead Product Manager, BCS Fintech; doctoral student at the Institute of Public Administration and Civil Service, Russian Presidential
Academy of National Economy and Public Administration
129110, Moscow, Prospekt Mira, 69/1.
References
1. Albert M.N., Lazzari D.N., Ohin, A.Y. (2022). How Organizations can Develop Solidarity in the Workplace? A Case Study. Humanist Management Journal. No. 7. P. 327-346.
2. Anderson K.M. (2018). Robert Owen and the Origin of Cooperative Doctrines. Russian Political Science. No. 1 (6). P. 65-78 (in Rus.).
3. Anpleev A.A. (2011). Corporate culture as an object of research in modern socio-humanitarian knowledge. Bulletin of KazGUKI. No. 3. P. 53-64 (in Rus.).
4. Baranov Yu.V., Polyanskaya S.G. (2017). Modern view on the system of social partnership of the Russian Federation. Russian Journal of Entrepreneurship. No. 18. P. 32-44 (in Rus.).
5. Baturenko S.A. (2012). Solidarist tradition in the history of sociological theory: O. Comte, E. Durkheim. Moscow University Bulletin. Series 18. Sociology and political science. No. 4. P. 37-46 (in Rus.).
6. Blazhko A.A. (2018). Social partnership as a mechanism for regulating labor relations. Izvestiya of St. Petersburg State University of Economics. No. 6 (114). P. 72-86 (in Rus.).
7. Brazevich D.S. (2014). Sociological analysis of the concepts of organizational (corporate) culture as a factor in the development of the modern paradigm of human resource management. Sociology and Law. No. 1 (23). P. 82-94 (in Rus.).
8. Drozdov N.A. (2020). Theoretical aspects of the study of social partnership as a phenomenon of social activity. Bulletin of the Shadrinsk State Pedagogical University. No. 4 (48). P. 28-33 (in Rus.).
9. Dubovik A.K., Dubovik E.A. (2021). Ideas of partnership and dialogue in Russian social thought in the second half of the 19th–20th centuries. Trud. Profsojusy. Obschestvo. No. 4 (74). P. 10-15 (in Rus.).
10. Igumnov O.A. (2019). Corporate culture as a factor in the formation of the organization’s social capital. Sociology. No. 2. P. 19-27 (in Rus.).
11. Kochnev V.A., Tarasov A.V. (2015). Methods of building and managing the corporate culture of an organization. Bulletin of the Eurasian Science. No. 6 (31). P. 112-119 (in Rus.).
12. Kolesnikova N.A., Nesterov Yu.A. (2018). Social partnership in modern Russia. Socio-economic and humanitarian journal of the Krasnoyarsk State Agrarian University. No. 1 (7). P. 62-71 (in Rus.).
13. Morgan G., Pulignano V. (2020). Solidarity at Work: Concepts, Levels and Challenges. Work, Employment and Society. Vol. 34. No.1. P. 18-34.
14. Naumova N.V., Sorokina A.S. (2023). A conceptual view of social solidarity and human rights through the prism of modern realities. Uchenye zapiski. No. 1 (45). P. 185-190 (in Rus.).
15. Okatov A.V. (2017). The problem of social solidarity in classical sociology. Bulletin of the Tambov University. Series: Social Sciences. No. 1 (9). P. 27-35 (in Rus.).
16. Ozarkiv O.M. (2019). The study of corporate culture: theoretical and methodological foundations. NOMOTHETIKA: Philosophy. Sociology. Law. No. 3. P. 101-117 (in Rus.).
17. Rabotyazhev N.V. (2012). European social democracy in search of adaptation to a changing world. Politiya. No. 3 (66). P. 28-37 (in Rus.).
18. Sorokin P.S., Popova T.A. (2021). Classical and modern approaches to the study of solidarity: problems and prospects in the context of destructuring. RUDN Journal of Sociology. No. 3. P. 457- 468 (in Rus.).
19. Tyurikov A.G., Uzyumova N.V. (2019). Corporate culture as an object of sociological analysis. Medicine. Sociology. Philosophy. Applied research. No. 6. P. 83-91 (in Rus.).
20. Wilde L. (2021). The Concept of Solidarity: Emerging from the Theoretical Shadows? The British Journal of Politics and International Relations. Vol. 9. No. 1. P. 171-181.
21. Zhalkiev V.T. (2019). Categorization of social solidarity in the concept of E. Durkheim. Bulletin of the KRU of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia. No. 4. P. 87-94 (in Rus.).
Review
For citations:
Tarutin N.V. The concepts of social solidarity and social partnership as prerequisites for the formation of corporate culture. Communicology. 2023;11(2):115-127. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21453/2311-3065-2023-11-2-115-127
Views:
461
Email this article 
