Preview

Communicology

Advanced search

The Opinion of Russian Journalists on Professional Standards in Traditional and Digital Media

https://doi.org/10.21453/2311-3065-2024-12-1-122-133

Abstract

The field of journalism in Russia is undergoing continuous transformation influenced by the intricate political and legal landscape, as well as the dynamic advancements in technology and resulting social shifts. These changes disrupt established professional norms, roles, values, and practices within the journalism community. These changes disrupt established professional norms, roles, values, and practices within the journalism community. The discussion surrounding professional journalistic standards is not only prompted by the aforementioned factors but also by the gradual integration of AI technologies into everyday journalistic practices. Against this background, the author conducted a study based on 11 semi-structured interviews with the representatives of the professional community and devoted to the issues of professional identity of journalists, the boundaries of the profession and the transformation of professional standards. The study showed that despite some discrepancies in viewpoints, professionals emphasize the paramount importance of clearly defined “rules of engagement” that are comprehensible to both the journalism community and its audience. While core values remain largely unchanged, practical aspects such as formatting requirements and acceptable journalistic practices demonstrate adaptability to shifting socio-political, economic, and cultural contexts. Notably, values are consistent across traditional and new media platforms, whereas technical and practical standards exhibit greater flexibility and responsiveness to evolving norms. Ultimately, the specific standards adopted by individual editorial teams are contingent upon the media format and niche they occupy within the industry.

About the Author

A. I. Litvinova
Saint-Petersburg State University
Russian Federation

Alexandra I. Litvinova – senior lecturer at the Institute “Higher School of Journalism and Mass Communications”, St. Petersburg State University.

199034, Saint-Petersburg, Universitetskaya embankment, 7/9



References

1. Bardoel J., Deuze M. (2001). Network journalism: converging competencies of old and new media professionals. Australian journalism review. Vol. 23. No. 2. P. 91-103.

2. Carlson M. (2018). Automating Judgment? Algorithmic judgment, news knowledge, and journalistic professionalism. New Media & Society. No. 20 (5). P. 1755-1772. DOI: 10.1177/1461444817706684.

3. Crabtree B.F., Miller W.L. (1999). Using codes and code manuals: A template organizing style of interpretation. In: B.F. Crabtree, W.L. Miller (eds), Doing qualitative research, 2nd ed. P. 163-177.

4. Deuze M. (2005). Popular journalism and professional ideology: tabloid reporters and editors speak out. Media, Culture & Society. Vol. 27. No. 6. P. 861-882.

5. Deuze M. (2017). Understanding journalism as newswork: How it changes, and how it remains the same. Westminster papers in communication and culture. Vol. 5. No. 2. P. 4-24. DOI: 10.16997/wpcc.61.

6. Kotisova J. (2020). When the crisis comes home: Emotions, professionalism, and reporting on 22 March in Belgian journalists’ narratives. Journalism. No. 21 (11). P. 1710-1726.

7. Lazutina G.V. (2016). The social role of journalism in the context of modern discussions. Bulletin of Moscow University. Series 10. Journalism. No. 6. P. 178-191 (in Rus.).

8. Nigmatullina K.R. (2021). Professional journalistic culture in modern Russia: doctoral diss. [access mode]: https://disser.spbu.ru/files/2021/disser_nigmatullina.pdf (in Rus.).

9. Noordegraaf M., Schinkel W. (2011). Professionalism as symbolic capital: Materials for a Bourdieusian theory of professionalism. Comparative Sociology. No. 10 (1). P. 67-96.

10. Simkacheva M.V., Shakirov A.I. (2018). Professional self-determination of journalists in the era of media convergence. Scientific notes of Kazan University. Series Humanities. No. 160-4. P. 917-924 (in Rus.).

11. Singer J. B. (2015). Out of bounds. In: Boundaries of journalism. Routledge. P. 21-36.

12. Sullivan J., Heinonen А. (2008). Old values, new media: Journalism role perceptions in a changing world. Journalism Practice. Vol. 2. No. 3. P. 357-371.

13. Tulupov V.V. (2017). Modern journalism: degeneration or replacement of activity? Accents: almanac. Vol. 5-6 (148-149). P. 2-5 (in Rus.).

14. Waisbord S. (2013). Reinventing professionalism: Journalism and news in global perspective. John Wiley & Sons.


Review

For citations:


Litvinova A.I. The Opinion of Russian Journalists on Professional Standards in Traditional and Digital Media. Communicology. 2024;12(1):122-133. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21453/2311-3065-2024-12-1-122-133

Views: 378


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2311-3065 (Print)
ISSN 2311-3332 (Online)