The pathways of political elites in the modern information and communication reality
https://doi.org/10.21453/2311-3065-2024-12-3-13-28
Abstract
The article is devoted to the socio-political understanding of the functioning of the political and administrative elite in the modern information and communication space. The relevance of the research topic is based on the need to redefine, in current political and social reality, the concepts of political elite and administrative elite, as well as to identify its distinctive features. The authors lead theoretical foundations for defining the concepts of political elite and administrative elite from the point of view of linguistics and political science, analyse the approaches and models of western and domestic researchers on the problem of relations between the political and administrative elites, and put forward the thesis about the relative independence of the administrative elite as a category of political science analysis and the validity of studying public administration outside the framework of the concept of the dichotomy of political and administrative elites. The final part of provides the authors’ assessment of the role and the pathways of Western political elites in the context of modern geopolitical reality.
About the Authors
F. I. SharkovRussian Federation
Sharkov Felix Izosimovich – DSc (Soc.), Professor, Honored Scientist of the Russian Federation, Head of the Department of Public Relations and Media Policy, Deputy Dean of the Faculty of Journalism
119571, Moscow, Vernadsky av., 84
M. A. Rodionov
Russian Federation
Rodionov Mikhail Aleksandrovich – DSc (Military), Professor, Professor of the Faculty of National Security
119571, Moscow, Vernadsky av., 82/1
T. A. Volkova
Russian Federation
Volkova Tatyana Aleksandrovna – Head of the Department of Legal Support
117556, Moscow, Simferopolsky blv., 13
References
1. Ananyeva E.V., Okoshin O.V. (2023). Britain-2022: change of prime ministers, change of monarch. Moscow: Institute of Europe, Russian Academy of Sciences (in Rus.).
2. Armstrong J.A. (1973). The European Administrative Elite. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
3. Ashin G.K. (2005). The concept of “elite” and its role in political research. Russian Journal of Philosophical Sciences. No. 8. P. 55-67 (in Rus.).
4. Blondel J., Muller-Rommel F. (2007). Political elites. In: The Oxford Handbook of Political Behavior. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
5. Burch M., Moran M. (1985). The changing British political elite, 1945–1983: MPs and cabinet ministers. Parliamentary Affairs. Vol. 38. No. 1. P. 1-15.
6. Burda M.A. (2017). Political elite of modern Russia: crisis of formation. Post-Soviet Issues. Vol. 4. No. 4. P. 373-379 (in Rus.).
7. Cox S.M. (2001). Challenges to the European administrative elite in the new millennium. Dogus University Journal. Vol. 2. No. 1. P. 35-54.
8. Duka A.V. (2023). Elites in the structure of political opportunities. Power and Elites. Vol. 10. No. 2. P. 24-43 (in Rus.).
9. Etzioni-Halevy E. (1993). The Elite connection: Problems and potential of Western democracy. Cambridge: Polity Press.
10. Farmer K.C. (1992). The Soviet Administrative Elite. New York; Westport; London: Praeger Publishers.
11. Gaman-Golutvina O.V. (2000). Definition of the main concepts of elitology. Polis. Political Studies. No. 3. P. 97-103 (in Rus.).
12. Gaman-Golutvina O.V. (2016). Political elites as an object of research in domestic political science. Political Science. No. 2. P. 38-73(in Rus.).
13. Iyengar S. et al. (2019). The origins and consequences of affective polarization in the United States. Annual review of political science. Vol. 22. No. 1. P. 129-146.
14. Lapina N.Y. (2023). Political process in modern France: society and power. World Economy and International Relations. Vol. 67. No. 8. P. 37-47 (in Rus.).
15. Mills C.W. (1956). The Power Elite. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
16. Palitai I.S. (2022). Russian political elite: current state and dynamics of key indicators (based on research materials from 2011-2021). Polis. Political studies. No. 4. P. 148-160 (in Rus.).
17. Ponedelkov A.V., Starostin A.M. (2004). Modern Russian elites: features of genesis, interaction and positioning in power. Political Science. No. 1. P. 138-159 (in Rus.).
18. Samusevich A.V. (2018). The relationship between the political and administrative elite: on the content of concepts. The Bulletin of the Volga Region Institute of Administration. Vol. 18. No. 3. P. 122-129 (in Rus.).
19. Sharkov F.I., Ponedelkov A.V., Vorontsov S.A. (2017). On the problems of the modern Russian political elite and possible directions for their resolution. RUDN Journal of Sociology. Vol. 17. No. 4. P. 524-541 (in Rus.).
20. Shentiakova A.V. (2008). Dynamics of intra-elite interaction in the context of modern Russia. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg University. International Relations. No. 4. P. 58-63 (in Rus.).
21. Solovieva D.D. (2021). The education system as a channel for recruiting the political elite in Great Britain and France: Author’s thesis. Moscow (in Rus.).
22. Umaru U. (2014). Conflict between political elites and public administrators: it’s genesis and public service reforms in Nigeria. Global Journal of Political Science and Administration. Vol. 2. No. 4. P. 34-50.
23. Usova Y.V. (2012). Political processes in Russia: modern realities and prospectsю Observer. Vol. 269. No. 6. P. 5-14 (in Rus.).
24. Zhdanov A.I., Kosolapov K.V. (2023). Polarization of American Elites Based on the Analysis of Candidates’ Program Statements during the 2020 Presidential Elections. Politiya. No. 1 (108). P. 161-181 (in Rus.).
Review
For citations:
Sharkov F.I., Rodionov M.A., Volkova T.A. The pathways of political elites in the modern information and communication reality. Communicology. 2024;12(3):13-28. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21453/2311-3065-2024-12-3-13-28