Potential of media resources in popularizing volunteer activities
https://doi.org/10.21453/2311-3065-2024-12-3-93-103
Abstract
The article is devoted to the potential of mass media in popularization of volunteering among students. Development of media technologies inevitably influences the process of socialization. Digital media resources have a strong influence on the formation of behavior patterns, norms and rules, and therefore their capabilities can be used to develop a prosocial orientation in the behavior of young people. Promotion of volunteer activities involves an appropriate choice of channels and methods of presenting information in the mass media, taking into account the characteristics of the audience. Effective constructs in this process can be strategies that involve the possibility of influencing decision-making at the subconscious level, including on the basis of priming, framing, imprinting by focusing the audience's attention on strategically important moments and situations. The combination of social, cognitive and information technologies makes it possible to include manipulative techniques in the communicative and information space that contribute to the formation of an attractive image of volunteering and motivation of corresponding behavioral attitudes.
About the Authors
A. A. AlekseenokRussian Federation
Alekseenok Anna Alekseevna – DSc (Soc.), Professor, acting Head of the Department of Sociology and Social Technologies
302028, Orel, Oktyabrskaya st., 12
Yu. Yu. Putilina
Russian Federation
Putilina Yulia Yurievna – senior lecturer of the Department of Sociology and Social Technologies
302028, Orel, Oktyabrskaya st., 12
V. I. Muzalevsky
Russian Federation
Muzalevsky Vladislav Igorevich – postgraduate student at the Department of Sociology and Social Technologies
302028, Orel, Oktyabrskaya st., 12
References
1. Bryant J., Finklea B.W., Thompson S. (2012). Fundamentals of media effects: second edition. Long Grove, IL: Waveland Press.
2. Crick N.R., Dodge K.A. (1994). A review and reformulation of social information-processing mechanisms in children's social adjustment. Psychological Bulletin. Vol. 115. No. 1. P. 74-101.
3. Dombrovskaya A.Y., Ognev A.S. (2023). Representation of the image of the future of Russia in the minds of modern Russian youth and in social media: results of projective, instrumental cognitive science and cybermetrics. Human Сapital. No. 8 (176). P. 86-98 (in Rus.).
4. Dubovitskaya L.V. (2013). The phenomenon of creolized text (based on creolized texts of written communication): Author’s thesis. Moscow (in Rus.).
5. Graham J. et al. (2013). Moral foundations theory: The pragmatic validity of moral pluralism. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology. Vol. 47. Р. 55-130.
6. Greitemeyer T. (2009). Effects of songs with prosocial lyrics on prosocial behavior: Further evidence and a mediating mechanism. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. Vol. 35. No. 11. Р. 1500-1511.
7. Jennings B., Thompson S. (2004). Fundamentals of Media Impact. Moscow: Williams Publishing House (in Rus.).
8. Kaira Y.V. (2015). Ways to improve the efficiency of information and analytical technologies of government agencies. Izvestiya Tula State University. No. 2. P. 38-48 (in Rus.).
9. Kislyakov P.A., Shmeleva E.A. (2018). Media education in preparing students to ensure information and psychological security. Media Education. No. 1. P. 107-116 (in Rus.).
10. Merkulov P.A., Alekseenok A.A., Kiryukhina Y.V., Saprykin S.S. (2023). Improving social technologies for forming a positive image of internal affairs bodies. Communicology. Vol. 11. No. 3. P. 148-161 (in Rus.).
11. Mkrtumova I.V. (2023). Digital socialization: symbiosis of mass media and artificial intelligence as a channel for focal construction of value orientations of young people (socially approved or false). Sociology. No. 6. P. 211-219 (in Rus.).
12. Potter W.J. (2012). Media Effects. Los Angeles; London: Sage.
13. Prokazina N.V., Shekshuev S.V. (2023). Communication and information technologies for assessing social processes at the regional level. Central Russian Journal of Social Sciences. Vol. 18. No. 2. P. 49-70 (in Rus.).
14. Putilina Y.Y., Polyakov A.A., Dorokhova Y.V. (2023). Cultural and historical retrospective of the development of volunteering in Russia. Central Russian Journal of Social Sciences. Vol. 18. No. 4. P. 158-177 (in Rus.).
15. Riddle K. et al. (2012). “People killing people in the news”: descriptions by young children of the frightening content of television news. Communication Quarterly. Vol. 60. No. 2. P. 278-294.
16. Saleem M., Anderson C.A., Gentile D.A. (2012). The influence of prosocial, neutral and violent video games on the emotional state of college students’ aggressive behavior. Wiley Periodicals. Vol. 38. No. 4. P. 263-271.
17. Saveliev I.A. (2019). Remote content analysis of feedback mechanisms for the implementation of “breakthrough” projects in regions with different levels of socio-cultural modernization. Information and Analytical Bulletin of the Institute of Sociology of the Federal Research Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences. No. 2. P. 88-94 (in Rus.).
18. Sharkov F.I. (2004). Integrated brand communications: (brand in the system of integrated marketing communications). Moscow: RIP-holding (in Rus.).
19. Sparks G. (2015). Media effects research: A basic overview. Boston, MA: Cengage Learning.
20. Veselov Y.V., Karapetyan S.R., Belova M.V. (2023). Trust in the digital world: monograph. Moscow: Aj Pi Ar Media (in Rus.).
Review
For citations:
Alekseenok A.A., Putilina Yu.Yu., Muzalevsky V.I. Potential of media resources in popularizing volunteer activities. Communicology. 2024;12(3):93-103. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21453/2311-3065-2024-12-3-93-103