Value model of political communications of the Russian elite in conflictual and deviant polysubject environment
https://doi.org/10.21453/2311-3065-2024-12-3-138-149
Abstract
The article, based on the results of a comprehensive political analysis, substantiates that in the modern socio-political reality, the formation of a multipolar world, the problem of the effectiveness of political communications are closely related to the potential of political and administrative power elites. The communicative qualities of a modern politician are enhanced by value-civilizational and moral parameters, the ability of strategic vision and the ability to maintain civilizational and value discourse in the political and economic system and direct it towards sustainable advanced development of society. This, in turn, involves the analysis and development of parameters for diagnosing the quality of modern Russian political and administrative elites, their moral and professional adequacy and aptitude; so is the actualization and solution of the problem of deviations at the elite level of political power. In order to form a value model of political communications of the Russian elite, it is necessary to comprehensively consider management systems based on specific values (including management of public values), identify and position public values as determinants of socio-political development, develop mechanisms to counteract the value degradation and marginalization of national elites, take into account the propensity of the Russian government to identify internal and external enemies in the previous stages of development, and also to the uncritical borrowing of the models of democracy alien to the Russian cultural and civilizational code, and the image imitation of elite qualities.
About the Author
K. V. StepanovRussian Federation
Stepanov Konstantin Vladimirovich – CandSc (Law), associate professor, Head of the Department of Criminal Procedure and Criminalistics
344006, Rostov-on-Don, Bolshaya Sadovaya str., 105/42
References
1. Buckler S., Dolowitz D. (2012). Ideology matters: Party competition, ideological positioning and the case of the conservative party under David Cameron. The British Journal of Politics and International Relations. Vol. 14. No. 4. P. 576-594.
2. Cornelissen J. (2014). Corporate communication: A guide to theory and practice. London: Sage.
3. Dahl R.A. (2010). Polyarchy: participation and opposition. Moscow: Publishing House of the State University – Higher School of Economics (in Rus.).
4. Gaman-Golutvina O.V. (2004). Regional elites of Russia: personal composition and evolutionary trends (I). Polis. Political Studies Journal. No. 2. P. 6-19 (in Rus.).
5. Gaman-Golutvina O.V. (2011). The system of public administration of the Russian Federation as an instrument of anti-crisis policy: assessment of effectiveness. In: Elites and society in comparative measurement. Moscow: ROSSPEN (in Rus.).
6. Gaman-Golutvina O.V. (2016). Political elites as an object of research in domestic political science. Political Science. No. 2. P. 38-73 (in Rus.).
7. Gilinsky Y. (2012). Deviance, Crime and Social Control in the “New World”. Collection of Articles. SPb: Alef-Press (in Rus.).
8. Hallahan K. et al. (2007). Defining strategic communication. International journal of strategic communication. Vol. 1. No. 1. P. 3-35.
9. Jakobsen S.B. (2015). The value of political values: An exploration into the communication of political values by coalition government parties: Author’s thesis. Aarhus.
10. Lepskiy V.E. (2015). Evolution of ideas about management (methodological and philosophical analysis). Moscow: Cogito-Center (in Rus.).
11. Mann S.R. (1992). Chaos theory and strategic thought. Parameters. Vol. 22. No. 3. P. 54-68.
12. Mills C. (2000). The Power Elite. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
13. Ponedelkov A.V., Starostin A.M. (2023). Elite genesis and elite positioning in the context of the formation of new power orders. Essays on political elitology. Rostov-on-Don: Publishing House of the Southern Russian University of the Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration (in Rus.).
14. Prokhorov A.P. (2002). Russian management model. Moscow: Journal Expert (in Rus.).
15. Pushkareva G.V. (2018). Public Values Management: Is It Possible to Talk About an Axiological Turn in Public Administration. Public Administration. E-journal (Russia). No. 68. P. 312-329 (in Rus.).
16. Vachkov I. (2014). Polysubject interaction in instructional environment. Psychology. Journal of Higher school of Economics. Vol. 11. No. 2. P. 36-50.
17. White J., Ypi L. (2010). Rethinking the modern prince: partisanship and the democratic ethos. Political Studies. Vol. 58. No. 4. P. 809-828.
Review
For citations:
Stepanov K.V. Value model of political communications of the Russian elite in conflictual and deviant polysubject environment. Communicology. 2024;12(3):138-149. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21453/2311-3065-2024-12-3-138-149