Audience Cultural Practices in the Digital Media Environment: the factor of recommendation services
https://doi.org/10.21453/2311-3065-2024-12-4-68-82
Abstract
The paper represents the analysis of the role of recommendation services as a new element of the modern media environment. The methodology presupposes that audience practices are interdependent by autonomous user activity, on the one hand, and structural parameters of media and other social institutions, on the other. The author argues that recommendation algorithms are an important component of platform management in the media business. Online monitoring of user behavior increases the targeting capabilities of recommendation services, contributes to the individualization and automation of communication exchange in a society of information abundance. The formats for implementing recommendation algorithms turn out to be “embedded” in media consumption, influencing individual’s cultural practices. Author concludes argued that media recommendation services are one of the areas of production of the algorithmic culture, as a result of the application of computational procedures for sorting and hierarchizing various objects of the life world based on behavioral data. Practice of using media recommendation services by the Russian audience forms the empirical part of the study. It was recorded that three quarters of users turned to the content offered by recommendation services. At the same time, the practices of algorithmic recommendations cause both positive and negative assessments. At the same time, the practices of algorithmic recommendations cause both positive and negative assessments. Opinions are divided on the issue of trust in recommendation services: about half of the respondents were characterized by varying degrees of distrust; whereas third of the respondents featured with trust in recommendation services. Findings revealed that trust in recommendation services is statistically significantly correlated with indicators of: age; positive expectations from the introduction of artificial intelligence technologies and their use in everyday life; activity of accessing social networks and online video viewing platforms.
About the Author
M. M. NazarovRussian Federation
Nazarov Mikhail Mikhailovich – DSc (Polit.), Chief researcher
119333, Moscow, Fotieva, 6, bld. 1
References
1. Anderson С. (2009). The Longer Long Tail. New York: Random House Books.
2. Bucher T. (2018). If... Then. Algorithmic power and politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
3. Caplan R. (2018). Algorithmic filtering. In: Mediated communication. Berlin; Boston: De Gruyter.
4. Chandler D., Munday R. (2020). A dictionary of media and communication. Oxford.
5. Fisher E., Mehozay Y. (2019). How algorithms see their audience: media epistemes and the changing conception of the individual. Media, Culture & Society. Vol. 41. No. 8. P. 1176-1191.
6. Hallinan B., Striphas T. (2016). Recommended for you: The Netflix Prize and the production of algorithmic culture. New Media & Society. Vol. 18. No. 1. P. 117-137.
7. Kirillina N.V., Fabrichnykh M.A. (2023). Characteristics of mediaspace: influence on the polarization of public opinion. Communicology (Russia). Vol. 11. No. 4. P. 51-59 (in Rus.).
8. LaRose R. (2010). The problem of media habits. Communication Theory. Vol. 20. No. 2. Р. 194-222.
9. Naab T.K., Schnauber A. (2016). Habitual initiation of media use and a response-frequency measure for its examination. Media Psychology. Vol. 19. No. 1. Р. 126-155.
10. Nazarov M.M. (2020). Media platforms and algorithms: content and social implications. Communicology (Russia). Vol. 8. No.2. P. 108-124 (in Rus.).
11. Pariser E. (2012). Behind the wall of filters. What the Internet hides from you. Moscow: Alpina Business Books (in Rus.).
12. Poluekhtova I.A. (2018). Dynamics of the motivational structure of television consumption of Russians. Mediascope. No. 4. P. 8 (in Rus.).
13. Rubin A.M. (1993). Audience activity and media use. Communication Monographs. Vol. 60. No. 1. P. 98-105.
14. Salikhova E.A. et al. (2022). Algorithmic recommender systems and digital media platforms: theoretical approaches. Information Society. No. 6. P. 84-95 (in Rus.).
15. Schwartz B. (2002). The paradox of choice. How to make decisions that we will not regret. Moscow: Bombora (in Rus.).
16. Striphas T. (2015). Algorithmic culture. European Journal of Cultural Studies. Vol. 18. No. 4-5. P. 395–412.
17. Vartanova E.L. (2019). Domestic media theory: basic concepts. Moscow: Faculty of Journalism, Moscow State University; Moscow University Publishing House (in Rus.).
18. Vartanova E.L. (2019). Media Theory: Domestic Discourse. Moscow: Faculty of Journalism, Moscow State University; Moscow University Publishing House (in Rus.).
19. Volodenkov S.V., Artamonova Y.D. (2020). Information capsules as a structural component of modern political Internet communication. Tomsk State University Journal of Philosophy, Sociology and Political Science. No. 53. P. 188-196 (in Rus.).
20. Webster J.G. (2014). The marketplace of attention: How audiences take shape in a digital age. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
21. Williams R. (1994). Television. Technology and cultural form. New York: Routledge.
Review
For citations:
Nazarov M.M. Audience Cultural Practices in the Digital Media Environment: the factor of recommendation services. Communicology. 2024;12(4):68-82. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21453/2311-3065-2024-12-4-68-82