Preview

Communicology

Advanced search

Creativity and Сreative Subject in the Field of Social Communications: modern understanding and basic characteristics (part II)

https://doi.org/10.21453/2311-3065-2024-12-4-96-106

Abstract

This paper is a follow-up of the manuscript published in the previous issue of this journal where creativity is represented as an immanent characteristic of the subject of communication1. This part starts from the understanding that any phenomenon cannot be considered a priori – objectively – creative or not creative. It is made so by an external – subjective – assessment formed in the course of communication, then social exchanges and interaction of the assessing subject with this phenomenon. Understanding the socio[1]communicative nature of creativity and its essence reveals in the process of relations regarding a product that has some special – creative – value in a certain community. The ontology of creativity, as well as the nature of a creative product, is closed to the category of communication. A creative subject puts a certain message into his product – pragmatic, aesthetic, emotional. This message is directed to the relevant target audiences of the creative product, its potential consumers. By decoding the meanings embedded in this product message, related to (a) novelty / unconventionality and (b) practical usefulness / market relevance, the target audiences perceive the product as creative. In our article, we assume that the assessment of creativity is expressed in three dimensions – product, subjective and activity-based.

About the Authors

D. P. Gavra
St. Petersburg State University
Russian Federation

Gavra Dmitry Petrovich – DSc (Soc.), Professor, Head of the Department of Public Relations in Business, Higher School of Journalism and Mass Communications

199004, St. Petersburg, 1st Line of Vasilievsky Isl., 26



Yu. P. Bayer
North-West Institute of Management
Russian Federation

Bayer Yulia Paulevna – CandSc (Soc.), Associate Professor of the Department of Social Technologies

119178, St. Petersburg, Sredny Prospekt Vasilievsky Isl., 57



References

1. Amabile T.M. (1982). Social psychology of creativity: A consensual assessment technique. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. Vol. 43. No. 5. P. 997-1013.

2. Amabile T.M. (1983). The social psychology of creativity. NY: Springer.

3. Csikszentmihalyi M. (1988). Society, culture, and person: A systems view of creativity. In: The nature of creativity. NY: Cambridge University Press.

4. Csikszentmihalyi M. (1996). Creativity: Flow and the psychology of discovery and invention. New York: Harper Collins.

5. Dewett T. (2004). Employee creativity and the role of risk. European Journal of Innovation Management. Vol. 7. No. 4. P. 257-266.

6. Guilford J.P. (1950). Creativity. American Psychologist. No. 5. P. 444-454.

7. Houran J., Ference G. (2006). Nurturing employee creativity. NY: HVS International.

8. Kaufman J., Baer J. (2005). Creativity across domains: Faces of the muse. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

9. Kilroy D. (1999). Creating the future: how creativity and innovation drive shareholder wealth. Management Decision. Vol. 4. No. 37. P. 363-374.

10. Marx K., Engels F. (1960). Works: in 30 volumes (transl.). 2nd ed. Vol. 23. M.: Gospolitizdat (in Rus.).

11. Parnes S. (1972). Creativity: Unlocking human potential. Buffalo, NY: D.O.K. Publishers.

12. Parnes S., Noller R. (1972). Applied creativity: The creative studies project: Part results of the two year program. Journal of Creative Behavior. No. 6. P. 164-186.

13. Petrowski M. (2000). Creativity research: Implications for teaching, learning and thinking. Reference Services Review. Vol. 4. No. 28. P. 304-312.

14. Sternberg R. (1999). A propulsion model of types of creative contributions. Review of General Psychology. No. 3. P. 83-100.

15. Sternberg R., Kaufman J., Pretz J. (2001). The propulsion model of creativity applied to the arts and letters. Journal of Creative Behavior. No. 35. P. 75-101.

16. Sternberg R., Kaufman J., Pretz J. (2004). A propulsion model of creative leadership. Innovation and Creativity Management. No. 13. P. 145-153.


Review

For citations:


Gavra D.P., Bayer Yu.P. Creativity and Сreative Subject in the Field of Social Communications: modern understanding and basic characteristics (part II). Communicology. 2024;12(4):96-106. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21453/2311-3065-2024-12-4-96-106

Views: 270


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2311-3065 (Print)
ISSN 2311-3332 (Online)