Formation of discourse on technological sovereignty in the agro-industrial complex: based on expert surveys
https://doi.org/10.21453/2311-3065-2025-13-4-150-165
Abstract
This article examines how key professional groups in Russia’s agro-industrial complex perceive the strategy of technological sovereignty. The authors consider technological sovereignty not only as an economic category, but also as a management practice whose success depends on the formation of a supportive discourse in the professional environment. The methodological basis of the study consisted of qualitative and quantitative methods: in-depth interviews and an expert survey among agronomists and top managers of agricultural enterprises, mainly from southern Russia. Key structural barriers that shape the skeptical discourse around the achievability of technological sovereignty have been identified. It has been established that the absolute priority in this problem area is the acute shortage of qualified personnel, which experts consider to be more significant than financial or foreign policy challenges. The second key problem is the loss of the scientific heritage of the USSR, which manifests itself in the inadequacy and poor equipment of scientific laboratories, as well as in the disconnect between science and the real sector. The conclusion is that without profound socio-economic reforms aimed at revitalizing rural areas and large-scale investments in human capital, the discourse on technological sovereignty will remain skeptical, and its prospects will be assessed as moderate.
Keywords
About the Authors
T. P. CherkasovaRussian Federation
Cherkasova Tatyana Pavlovna – Doctor of Economics, Professor, Dean of the Faculty of Political Science
344002, Rostov-on-Don, Pushkinskaya St., 70/52-54-56
A. B. Ponamaryov
Russian Federation
Ponamarev Alexander Borisovich – Candidate of Sociological Sciences, Associate Professor of the Department of Sociology of the South Russian Institute of Management
344002, Rostov-on-Don, Pushkinskaya St., 70/52-54-56
References
1. Afanasyev A.A. (2022). Technological sovereignty as a scientific category in the system of modern knowledge. Economics, Entrepreneurship and Law. Vol. 12, No. 9, pp. 2377–2394 (in Rus.).
2. Afanasyev A.A. (2023). Industrial policy of Russia for achieving technological sovereignty: theoretical, methodological foundations and practical aspects. Moscow: First Economic Publishing House LLC. 204 p. (in Rus.).
3. Afanasyev A.A. (2023). Industry of Russia: current state and conditions of formation. Journal of Innovation Economics. Vol. 13, No. 1, pp. 105-126. (in Rus.)
4. Altukhov A.I. (2023). Russian agro-industrial complex: problems and solutions. Accounting and Statistics. Vol. 20, No. 4, pp. 12-24. (in Rus.).
5. Bezbozhnova E.A. (2022). Economic security of the state in the context of technological development. Economics and Modern Management: Theory, Methodology, Practice. Penza: Nauka i Prosveshchenie, pp. 139-141. (in Rus.).
6. Edler J., Blind K., Kroll H., Schubert T. Technology sovereignty as an emerging frame for inno vation policy: Defining rationales, ends and means // Fraunhofer ISI Discussion Papers – Innovation Systems and Policy Analysis. 2021. No. 70. 35 p.
7. Europe’s Third Way to Technological Sovereignty. A Critique. Brussels: Transform! Europe. European network for alternative thinking and political dialogue, 2022. 41 p.
8. Food security, import substitution and self-sufficiency of Russian regions with agricultural products / Novichkov N.V., Novikov V.G., Sidorenko S.V., et al. (2024). Economics, Labor, Management in Agriculture. No. 7(113), pp. 87-96 (in Rus.).
9. Gerbaudo P. The Great Recoil. Politics after Populism and Pandemic. London, New York: Verso, 2021. 288 p.
10. Kamchatova E.Yu., Muratova M.N. (2023). Opportunities for applying the resource approach in ensuring the technological sovereignty of Russian industry. Innovations and Investments. No. 2, pp. 196-201 (in Rus).
11. Konstantinov I.B., Konstantinova E.P. (2022). Technological sovereignty as a strategy for the future development of the Russian economy. Bulletin of the Volga Region Institute of Administration. Vol. 22, No. 5, pp. 12-22 (in Rus.).
12. Kundius V.A., Sergienko O.V. (2023). Determining factors for achieving technological sovereignty in the agro-industrial complex. Nikon Readings. No. 28, pp. 45-51 (in Rus.).
13. Nechaev V.I., Poddubny N.A. (2023). State support as the main instrument of technological modernization of the domestic agro-industrial complex. Economics of Agricultural and Processing Enterprises. No. 2, pp. 8-13 (in Rus.).
14. Petrov M.N., Filippov Ya.S. (2023). Technological sovereignty: basic principles of the national scientific and technological security concept. Journal of Innovation Economics. Vol. 13, No. 3, pp. 1185–1198 (in Rus.).
15. Price regulation and price relations in the agro-industrial complex at the present stage / Ushachev I.G., Maslova V.V., Zaruk N.F., et al. (2024). APK: Economics, Management. No. 4, pp. 3-2 (in Rus.).
16. Romanova O.A., Sirotin D.V., Ponomareva A.O. (2022). From the economy of resistance to a resilient economy (the case of an industrial region). AlterEconomics. Vol. 19, No. 4, pp. 620-637 (in Rus.).
17. Safiullin M.R., Elshin L.A. (2023). Sanction pressure on the Russian economy: ways to overcome costs and benefits of confrontation in the framework of import substitution. Finance: Theory and Practice. Vol. 27, No. 1, pp. 150-161 (in Rus.).
18. Shkodinsky S.V., Kushnir A.M., Prodchenko I.A. (2022). The impact of sanctions on Russia’s technological sovereignty. Problems of Market Economy. No. 2, pp. 75-96 (in Rus.).
19. Smeshkо O.G., Plotnikov V.A., Vertakova Yu.V. (2022). Prospects of the Russian economy: new challenges to economic security and restructuring of public administration. Economics and Management. Vol. 28, No. 6, pp. 524–537 (in Rus.).
20. Stepanova T.D. (2022). Technological sovereignty of Russia as an element of economic security. Economics: Yesterday, Today, Tomorrow. Vol. 12, No. 9-1, pp. 567-577. (in Rus.).
21. Strategizing the technological sovereignty of the national economy / Kvint V.L., Novikova I.V., Alimuradov M.K., et al. (2022). Management Consulting. No. 9(165), pp. 57-67 (in Rus.).
22. Technology sovereignty: From demand to concept, Perspectives – Policy Briefs. Fraunhofer Institute for Systems and Innovation Research, 2020. 28 p.
23. Ushachev I.G., Kolesnikov A.V., Maslova V.V. (2025). Priority areas for the development of the agro- industrial complex at the present stage. APK: Economics, Management. No. 1, pp. 3-13. (in Rus.).
24. Ushachev I.G., Maslova V.V., Kolesnikov A.V. (2022). Increasing agricultural production to ensure food security and expand the export potential of the Russian agro-industrial complex. Economy of Region. Vol. 18, No. 4, pp. 1178-1193 (in Rus.).
Review
For citations:
Cherkasova T.P., Ponamaryov A.B. Formation of discourse on technological sovereignty in the agro-industrial complex: based on expert surveys. Communicology. 2025;13(4):150-165. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21453/2311-3065-2025-13-4-150-165
JATS XML

























