Streaming development trends and regulation methods: the Chinese approach
https://doi.org/10.21453/2311-3065-2026-14-1-150-163
Abstract
The widespread use of streaming in contemporary society makes researchers consider the increasing number of facets of this complex social phenomenon with distinct media, social-cultural, technological, and economic characteristics. Since Chinese streaming platforms were created and became popular much earlier than in other countries, the presented description of streaming focuses on the Chinese approach to its development and regulation. The article describes the components of streaming that make this type of broadcasting significant for sociological study, the main types of streaming and the institutional structure of the Chinese streaming industry (key players, scale of public engagement, segmentation of streaming channels audiences, etc.). The authors identify the key trends in the development of the streaming industry in China (competition between national and international broadcasts, huge reach and commercial success, interaction between corporations and the state in content moderation, etc.) using TikTok as an example, since it determined the phenomenal success of Chinese streamers in the international online space and became an instrument of China’s «soft power». The article highlights the key areas of government regulation of streaming in China: economically, authorities are interested in developing the streaming industry as a driver of economic growth and a tool for job creation (especially at the regional level), while politically and ideologically, they strictly control streaming by legally prohibiting some content and encouraging streaming platforms to implement self-regulation measures. Thus, the directions of government and public regulation of streaming depend on its value content and objective ideological and technological capabilities for its control, and there are clear opportunities for applying Chinese experience to Russian realities.
About the Authors
I. V. TrotsukRussian Federation
Irina Vladimirovna Trotsuk – Doctor of Sociological Sciences, Professor, Professor of the Department of Sociology, Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences
117198, Moscow, Miklukho-Maklaya St., 6
E. A. Chulkova
China
Ekaterina Alekseevna Chulkova – Master’s Student of the School of International Chinese Language Education
650500, PRC, Yunnan Province, Kunming, Chenggong District
References
1. Avdashkin A.A. (2018). Global and local diasporas. Bulletin of the Udmurt University. Series: Sociology. Political Science. International Relations. Vol. 2. No. 4 (in Rus.).
2. Arbuzov S.S., Griban O.N., Konstantinov A.N., Perevalova T.V. (2020). Stream Learning Technology at the University. Yekaterinburg: Ural State Pedagogical University, (in Rus.).
3. Bolotnov A.V. (2021). Stream as a new hypermedia genre. Bulletin of the Volgograd State University. Series 2: Linguistics. No. 2 (in Rus.).
4. Bolycheva M.D. Stream broadcasting as a phenomenon of the contemporary media environment. Communicology. 2018. No. 4 (in Rus.).
5. Brennan M. (2021). Attention Factory: The Story of TikTok and China’s ByteDance. Moscow: AST, (in Rus.).
6. Vorontsov S.A., Sharkov F.I., Ponedelkov A.V. (2021). Problems of communication between the government, society, and the media in the field of extremism prevention. Communicology. Vol. 9. No. 1 (in Rus.).
7. Griffiths J. (2022). The Great Firewall of China: How to Build and Control an Alternative Version of the Internet. Moscow: Eksmo, (in Rus.).
8. Duan J. (2023). Webcast in China: development history and regulatory challenges. Science. Education. The Present Time. No. 4 (in Rus.).
9. Lin J. (2020). Fundamentals of legal regulation and administrative control of the Internet in China. NB: Administrative Law and Administration Practice. No. 2 (in Rus.).
10. Ma Huateng, Meng Zhaoli, Yan Deli, Wang Hualei. (2019). Digital Transformation of the National Economy Infrastructure. Moscow: Intellectual Literature, (in Rus.).
11. Chudinov S. (2021). TikTokers and Many Others. How Chinese Social Networks Work. Moscow: Chance, (in Rus.).
12. Brewer J., Ruberg B., Cullen A.L.L., Persaud C.J. (2023). .Real Life in Real Time: Live Streaming Culture. MIT Press,
13. Burroughs B.E. (2015). Streaming Media: Audience and Industry Shift in a Networked Society. PhD Thesis. University of Iowa,
14. Cunningham S., Craig D., Lin J. China’s livestreaming industry: platforms, politics, and precarity. International Journal of Cultural Studies. 2019. Vol. 22. No. 6.
15. Raphael J. Types of Live Streaming for Communication. London, 2020.
16. Sharkov F.I., Kirillina N.V. Dichotomy of the personal and the public in virtual communities. Communicology. 2022. Vol. 10. No. 4.
17. Widodo R.E., Napitupulu T.A. Exploring the impact of live streaming for e-commerce business: a systematic literature review. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Information Technology. 2023. Vol. 101. No. 16.
18. Yu T., Chen Y., Lu X. How do live-streaming platforms facilitate persuasion in political campaigns? Theory and empirical evidence from the perspective of affordance actualization. Information & Management. 2023. Vol. 60. No. 3.
Review
For citations:
Trotsuk I.V., Chulkova E.A. Streaming development trends and regulation methods: the Chinese approach. Communicology. 2026;14(1):150-163. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21453/2311-3065-2026-14-1-150-163
JATS XML
























