Digital Transformation of Public Administration in the Strategic Frontier: From Risk Assessment to Institutionalization of Trust
https://doi.org/10.21453/2311-3065-2026-14-1-178-194
Abstract
The concepts of «information society», «digital revolution», and «digital transformation» are integrating into scientific and socio-political discourse, becoming the focus of research attention, analysis, and interpretation of current trends and tendencies in changing social space, social structure, models and mechanisms of social interaction, and the dynamics and consequences of digitalization in various spheres of public life. In the context of global digital transformation and the emergence of a new social reality, there is an urgent need for institutional government structures to develop a comprehensive and adequate response. This process requires identifying optimal parameters that will ensure the sustainable development of a public administration system functioning as a dynamic social and communicative system.
The authors emphasize that contemporary socio-political realities require a deep and comprehensive understanding of the place and role of strategic communications in the context of power relations and information exchanges. These processes, occurring within the context of digital transformation, have a significant impact on the effectiveness of public institutions and require careful analysis from the perspective of management theory and practice. Thus, the study of strategic communications in the context of digital transformation is a relevant and significant task requiring an interdisciplinary approach and the integration of knowledge from various scientific fields.
About the Authors
V. V. SilkinRussian Federation
Vladimir Vladimirovich Silkin – Doctor of Political Sciences, Professor, Dean of the Faculty of Journalism at the Institute of Public Administration and Social Sciences
Moscow
Sh. S. Suleimanova
Russian Federation
Shukran Saidovna Suleimanova – Doctor of Political Sciences, Associate Professor, Editor-in-Chief of the scientific journal «Issues of National and Federal Relations»
119545 Moscow, Vernadsky Avenue, 84
References
1. Analysis of Security Threats for the First Nine Months of 2025.pdf. https://www.securitycode.ru/upload/iblock/2b5/72pqd6fg3ugssmfx1r9q4xv8pudh99zj/ (in Rus.).
2. Azimov, F.A. (2021). National Security Strategy of the Russian Federation// Vlast. No. 4. pp. 79-83 (in Rus.).
3. Bogdanov, S.V. (2017). Strategic Communications: Conceptual Approaches and Models for Public Administration // Public Administration. Electronic Bulletin. No. 61, pp. 132-152 (in Rus.).
4. Burov V.V., Petrov M.V., Shklyaruk M.S., Sharov A.V. (2018). The State as a Platform: An Approach to Implementing a High-Tech Public Administration System // Public Service. Vol. 20. No. 3, pp. 16-17 (in Rus.).
5. Decree of the President of the Russian Federation of July 2, 2021 No. 400. On the National Security Strategy of the Russian Federation // Collected Legislation of the Russian Federation. 2021. No. 27. Art. 5351.
6. Digital Economy Research – NAFI. 2026 https://nafi.ru/direction/digital_economy/
7. Digital government 2020: prospects for Russia. https://documents.vsemirnyjbank.org/ru/publication/documents-reports/documentdetail/690171468181130951/
8. Emelyanova E.V., Petryanin A.V. (2021). National Security Strategy of the Russian Federation: Reassessing Modern Challenges // Bulletin of the BelLaw Institute of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia. No. 4, pp. 10-16 (in Rus.).
9. Federal Law of December 28, 2010 No. 390-FZ «On Security» (as amended by Federal Laws of October 5, 2015 No. 285-FZ, February 6, 2020 No. 6-FZ, November 9, 2020 No. 365-FZ, April 28, 2023 No. 155-FZ, and July 10, 2023 No. 286-FZ) // Collected Legislation of the Russian Federation of January 3, 2011 No. 1, Art. 2 (in Rus.).
10. Fedotova, V.G. (2020). Life in the Context of Coronavirus // Knowledge. Understanding. Skill. No. 3, pp. 90-99 (in Rus.).
11. Gavra D.P. (2015). The Category of Strategic Communication: Current State and Basic Characteristics // The Information Age. No. 3 (4). P. 231.
12. Gray J., Rumpe B. (2017). Models for the digital transformation // Software & Systems Modeling. Vol. 17. No. 2, pp. 307-308. Marres N. Digital (in Rus.).
13. Kazantsev S.V. (2015). On the New National Security Strategy of the Russian Federation // The World of the New Economy. No. 3, pp. 7-15 (in Rus.).
14. Kravchenko S.A. (2019). Sociology in Motion: The Demand for a Humanistic Digital Turn. Bulletin of Peoples' Friendship University of Russia. Series: Sociology, рр. 397-405. Access mode: https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=40101053 (in Rus.).
15. Molchanov N.A., Egorov V.P., Matevosova E.K. (2015). New aspects of legal regulation of state strategic planning in the Russian Federation // Current problems of Russian law. No. 2, pp. 28-34 (in Rus.).
16. National project «Data Economy and Digital Transformation of the State». Government of the Russian Federation. http://government.ru/rugovclassifier/923/about/ (in Rus.).
17. Okinawa Charter of the Global Information Society. http://www.kremlin.ru/supplement/3170 (in Rus.).
18. Philosophical Analytics of the Digital Age: Collection of Scientific Articles / Ed. L.V. Shipovalova, Dudnik. St. Petersburg: Publishing House of St. Petersburg University, 2020. 368 p.
19. Pisarev I.V., Byvshev V.I., Panteleeva I.A., Parfentyeva K.V. (2022). Study of the readiness of Russian regions for digital transformation // π-Economy. No. 2. https://cyberleninka.ru/article/n/issledovanie-gotovnosti-regionov-rossii-k-tsifrovoy-transformatsii (in Rus.).
20. Plotnikov V.A., Prolubnikov A.V., Rukinov M.V. (2020). Institutional and strategic aspects of state policy in the sphere of ensuring national security of the Russian Federation // Global nuclear security. No. 2 (35), pp. 119-130 (in Rus.).
21. Ponomarev A.I. (2017). On the strategy and system of ensuring national interests // National security / nota bene. No. 1 (48), pp. 43-51 (in Rus.).
22. Reis J., Amorim M., Melão N., Matos P. (2018). Digital Transformation: A Literature Review and Guidelines for Future Research. In: Á. Rocha et al. (Eds.): WorldCIST’182018, pp. 411-421.
23. Smotritskaya I.I. (2018). Public administration in the context of the development of the digital economy: strategic challenges and risks // ETAP. No. 4 (in Rus.).
24. Sociology. The Reinvention of Social Research. Cambridge; Polity Press. 2017.
25. Stepanov A.V. (2015). The concept of the category «National Security»: a theoretical and legal analysis // Bulletin of Perm University. Legal sciences. No. 2 (28), рp. 8-17.
26. The Constitution of the Russian Federation (adopted by popular vote on December 12, 1993) (taking into account amendments introduced by the Laws of the Russian Federation on amendments to the Constitution of the Russian Federation of December 30, 2008 No. 6-FKZ, of December 30, 2008 No. 7-FKZ, of February 5, 2014 No. 2-FKZ, of July 21, 2014 No. 11-FKZ, of March 14, 2020 No. 1-FKZ) // Rossiyskaya Gazeta. 2020. No. 144.
27. The Federation Council listed the main indicators of Russia's «digital maturity». https://senatinform.ru/news/v_sf_perechislili_glavnye_pokazateli_tsifrovoy_zrelosti_rossii/
28. Toffler E. (2002). Future Shock: Trans. from English. Moscow: OOO Izdatelstvo ACT. 557 p. (in Rus.).
29. Veselov Yu.V., Skvortsov N.G. (2021). Trust in the Age of Digital Transformations: A Sociological Study // Sociological Research. No. 6, pp. 57-68 (in Rus.).
30. Yakovlev-Chernyshev V.A. (2021). Digitalization of Public Administration in the Russian Federation: Advantages and Risks // NB: Administrative Law and Administration Practice. No. 2 (in Rus.).
31. Zhigulin G.P. (2014). Organizational and Legal Support for Information Security. St. Petersburg: SPb NIUITM (in Rus.).
Review
For citations:
Silkin V.V., Suleimanova Sh.S. Digital Transformation of Public Administration in the Strategic Frontier: From Risk Assessment to Institutionalization of Trust. Communicology. 2026;14(1):178-194. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21453/2311-3065-2026-14-1-178-194
JATS XML
























