Preview

Communicology

Advanced search

Improving business social responsibility communication practices

https://doi.org/10.21453/2311-3065-2026-14-2-213-228

Abstract

The article analyzes and theoretically systematizes the mechanisms of business social responsibility in the context of digitalization, growing social instability, and changes in consumer behavior, and shows how these mechanisms are related to sustainable development and the competitiveness of organizations. Using a theoretical and methodological analysis of domestic and foreign works on business social responsibility, corporate social responsibility (CSR), sustainable development, anomie, «fluid modernity», branding, etc., a conceptual and substantive analysis of key categories (responsibility, business social responsibility, corporate social responsibility, ESG, etc.) and a systematization and typology of approaches and mechanisms (highlighting the levels of social responsibility, approaches to its economic meaning, principles and mechanisms of implementation) the authors clarify and generalize the concept of «business social responsibility» as broader in relation to CSR, related simultaneously to economic and socio-cultural effects, systematize approaches to the economic meaning of social responsibility (liberal, traditional, social, strategic) with Arguing in favor of social and strategic approaches, they propose and conceptually substantiate a three-level model for the implementation of business social responsibility (legislative, benefit-oriented and «altruistic» levels, including social entrepreneurship), develop and complement a system of principles and criteria for evaluating social responsibility mechanisms (balance, integration, consistency, manageability, communication) through reference to specific mechanisms. and KPIs, connect theoretical and sociological concepts (anomie, «fluid modernity», imitation, social branding) with modern practice of social responsibility of business (SRB) and risks of imitation.

About the Authors

S. M. Kuleshov
Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation
Russian Federation

Kuleshov Sergey Mikhailovich – is a Candidate of Sociological Sciences, Associate Professor of the Department of Sociology, and a Leading Researcher at the Institute of Humanitarian Technologies and Social Engineering of the Faculty of Social Sciences and Mass Communications

Moscow



A. A. Panasyuk
Financial University under the Government of the Russian Federation
Russian Federation

Panasyuk Artur Anatolyevich – Candidate of Economic Sciences, Associate Professor of the Department of Sociology at the Faculty of Social Sciences and Mass Communications; Faculty of Social Sciences and Mass Communications

49 Leningradsky Prospekt, Moscow, 119334



References

1. ISO 26000:2010. (2010). Guidelines for the Social Responsibility of Organizations. M.: Publishing House of the Interstate Council for Standardization (in Rus.).

2. Bauman Z. (2002). Liquid Modernity. Translated from English. St. Petersburg: Publishing House of Peter (in Rus.).

3. Beck U. (2000). Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity. Translated from German. M.: Publishing House of Progress-Tradition (in Rus.).

4. Belousov K. Yu. (2016). Criteria for assessing the mechanism of social responsibility. Russian Journal of Management, 14(3), 87-105 (in Rus.).

5. Belousov K. Yu., Andreev A. V. (2019). Factors of social responsibility development. Vestnik FGBOU VO RGU, 8(2), 45-62 (in Rus.).

6. Blagov Yu. E. (2011). The concept of business social responsibility: philosophical foundations and economic rationality. Vestnik SPbGU, 2, 45-62 (in Rus.).

7. Boen G. (1953). Social responsibility of the entrepreneur. Harvard Business Review, 31(3), 29-39 (in Rus.).

8. Bronzino L. Yu., Osipova E. D. (2020). Social responsibility as a social institution. Sociological research, 2, 45-58 (in Rus.).

9. Vartik S., Kochren F. (1980). Social Responsibility of Business in the Information Age. Corporate Responsibility Review, 12(1), 56-73 (in Rus.).

10. Wood D. (1991). Corporate Social Responsibility Revisited. Academy of Management Review, 16(4), 691-718 (in Rus.).

11. Giddens A. (1990). The Consequences of Modernity. Translated from English. Moscow: Praksis Publishing House (in Rus.).

12. Godin S. (2008). The Purple Cow: How to Stand Out from the Competition. Translated from English. Moscow: Dobraya Kniga Publishing House (in Rus.).

13. Doholyan S. B. (2016). Social Responsibility as a Factor of Economic Development. Regional Economics and Management, 8(3), 34-48 (in Rus.).

14. Carnegie E. (1900). The Gospel of Wealth. Translated from English. Moscow: Publishing House Alliance(in Rus.).

15. Castells, M. (1996). The Information Age: Economy, Society, and Culture. Translated from English. Moscow: Publishing House of the Higher School of Economics (in Rus.).

16. Koryakov, A. G. (2010). The System of Factors of Business Social Responsibility. Economic Sciences, 71(9), 256-273(in Rus.).

17. Kucherova E. N. (2017). Principles of Sustainable Development of a Business Organization. Economics and Management, 25, 156-171 (in Rus.).

18. Carroll A. B. (2015). The Pyramid of Corporate Social Responsibility: The Business Ethics Side. Business Horizons, 34(4), 39-48 (in Rus.).

19. Merton R. K. (1938). Social Structure and Anomie. American Sociological Review, 3(5), 672-682 (in Rus.).

20. ILO (2008). Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work. Geneva: ILO Publishing House (in Rus.).

21. Mudzybaev K. (1995). Psychology of Responsibility. St. Petersburg: Aleteya Publishing House (in Rus.).

22. Muzhichkova Yu. E., Korobanova Zh. V. (2014). Modern Approaches to Social Responsibility. Vestnik MGIMO, 5(35), 112-128 (in Rus.).

23. Muskaya L. I. (2010). Charity in the system of corporate social responsibility. Space and time, 1(1), 144-152 (in Rus.).

24. Osipova E. A. (2019). Social branding as a tool of trust. Journal of Sociology and Social Anthropology, 22(1), 123-139 (in Rus.).

25. Parsons T. (1951). Social System. Translated from English. M.: Academic Project Publishing House (in Rus.).

26. Plotnikov V. V. (2018). The External Environment of an Organization and Social Responsibility. Russian Journal of Management, 16(4), 201-218 (in Rus.).

27. Plotnikov V. V. (2018). Theories of Business Social Responsibility. Russian Journal of Management, 16(2), 123-145 (in Rus.).

28. Plotnikov V. V. (2020). Anomie and social responsibility in the context of digitalization. Society and Economy, 8, 67-82.

29. Romanyuk J., Sharp B., Ehrenberg A. (2001). Branding and loyalty. Journal of Brand Management, 9(2), 115-128 (in Rus.).

30. Smith, A. (1776). An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations. Translated from English. Moscow: Eksmo Publishing House (in Rus.).

31. Toshchenko, Z. T. (2013). Imitation in the Modern World. Sociological Research, 11, 134-147 (in Rus.).

32. Touraine, A. (1996). What Can Be Done? Translated from French. M.: Progress Publishing House (in Rus.).

33. Uskova T. V., Razgulina E. D. (2019). Approaches to the Content of Business Social Responsibility. Economic and Social Issues (in Rus.).

34. Ford G., Crowthorn S. (1922). My Life and Work. Translated from English. M.: Publishing House Business Literature (in Rus.).

35. Friedman M. (1970). Corporate Social Responsibility – Maximizing Profits. The New York Times, September 13, 32-33 (in Rus.).

36. Freeman R. E. (1984). Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach. Boston: Pitman Publishing (in Rus.).

37. Elkington J. (1997). Cannibals in Cosmetics: The Triple Bottom Line of Corporate Social Responsibility. Oxford: Capstone Publishing (in Rus.).

38. Ethos R. (2005). Corporate Ethics and Social Responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 58(1), 23-37. (in Rus.).

39. Yunus M. (2007). A Banker for the Poor: Microloans and the Revolution in Financial Services for Low-Income Groups. Translated from English. Moscow: Vershina Publishing House. (in Rus.).


Review

For citations:


Kuleshov S.M., Panasyuk A.A. Improving business social responsibility communication practices. Communicology. 2026;14(2):213-228. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21453/2311-3065-2026-14-2-213-228

Views: 3

JATS XML


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2311-3065 (Print)
ISSN 2311-3332 (Online)