Education in Russian and foreign discourses: contexts of the new era
https://doi.org/10.21453/2311-3065-2026-14-2-183-198
Abstract
The contemporary educational-communicative space is characterized by a clash between anthropocentric and posthumanist value paradigms, which gives rise to an axiological crisis. The aim of this article is to substantiate the role of academic values in achieving valuesemantic consensus that ensures the stability of a heterogeneous communication system in the face of technological challenges and digital hybridization. Methodologically, the study draws on V.S. Stepin’s theory of complex systems, J. Habermas’s theory of communicative action, and the ideas of dialogue of cultures as developed by M.M. Bakhtin and V.S. Bibler. The paper demonstrates that the dialogical model can become a condition for developing value-semantic consensus among bearers of different worldview perspectives, without sliding either into the relativism of posthumanism or into the accelerationist dogmatism of transhumanism. The results of the study can be used to construct communicative strategies aimed at establishing foundations for value-semantic consensus within the academic community.
About the Authors
I. V. Orlova
Institute of Public Administration and Management of
the Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Irina V. Orlova, Doctor of Philosophical Sciences, Professor, Professor of the Sci entific and Educational Center «Theory and Technologies of Management in the field of Culture, Education and Science»
Author ID: 676060;
Moscow
L. V. Fokina
Russian State Budgetary Educational Institution of Higher Education, Russian University of Biotechnology (ROSBIOTECH)
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Lyudmila V. Fokina, Candidate of Philosophical Sciences, Associate Professor, Associate Professor of the Department of Social and Humanitarian Disciplines
Author ID: 678496;
119571, Moscow, Vernadsky Ave., 84, building 1.
B. A. Chernyshov
Office of the State Duma of the Federal Assembly of the Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Boris A. Chernyshov, Doctor of Technical Sciences, Deputy Chairman of the State Duma
Author ID: 473263;
Moscow
References
1. Stepin V.S. (2017). Civilization in the Age of Change: the search for new development strategies // Journal. Belarusian State University. Sociology. No. 3, pp. 6-11. Pp. 10.
2. Bakhtin M.M. (1963). Problems of Dostoevsky's poetics. M. 167 p.
3. Bakhtin M.M. (1979). Aesthetics of verbal creativity. M. Art. 426 pages.
4. Bauman, Zygmunt. (2005). An individualized society. Moscow: Logos. 390 pages.
5. Bayne, S & Jandric, P (2017). 'From anthropocentric humanism to critical posthumanism in digital education', Knowledge Cultures, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 197-216. [Электронный ресурс] URL: https://doi.org/10.22381/KC52201712. (date of the request: 30.01.2026).
6. Bryzgalina E.V., Kiselyov V.N. (2021). The role of social and humanitarian expertise in ensuring scientific leadership of the Russian Federation // Digital Scientist: Laboratory of the Philosopher. Vol. 4. No. 3. pp. 44-65. DOI: 10.32326/2618-9267-2021-4-3-44-65.
7. Budanov V.G. (2015). Synergetics and complexity theory: an interdisciplinary approach. Part I. Principles. Methodologists. Education [Text]: monograph / Budanov V.G. Kursk: CJSC «University Book». 180 pages.
8. Conceptualization of society in socio-philosophical and philosophical-historical reflection. monograph / K.H.Momjian, A.Y.Antonovsky, Yu.I.Semenov [et al.]; under the general editorship of K.H.Momjian, A.Y.Antonovsky. Moscow: INFRA-M, 2017. 348 p. (Scientific thought).
9. Fawns, T. An Entangled Pedagogy: Looking Beyond the Pedagogy–Technology Dichotomy. Postdigit Sci Educ 4, 711–728 (2022). [Еlectronic resource] URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-022-00302-7. (date of the request: 30.01.2026).
10. Floridi Luciano. (2015). The Onlife Manifesto. Being Human in a Hyperconnected Era. Springer Cham Heidelberg New York Dordrecht London. P. 264.
11. Fuller S. (2018). From Social Epistemology to Humanity 2.0. Interview with Steve Fuller // LOGOS. VOLUME 28 · # 5 · 2018, pp. 1-30.
12. Gershunsky B.S. (2002). Philosophy of education for the 21st century: A textbook for selfeducation. 2nd ed., revised and supplemented. Moscow: Pedagogical Society of Russia, 512 p.
13. Jandrić, P., Peters, M.A., Besley, T. et al. Postdigital Educational Geopolitics. Postdigit Sci Educ. (2024). [Еlectronic resource]. URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-024-00472-6. (дата обращения: 30.01.2026).
14. Karpov A.O. (2024). The image of the education of the future // Questions of philosophy. No. 1, pp. 17-28
15. Kremneva L.V., Zavodensky K.E., Rabinovich P.D., Apenko S.N. (2020) // Strategizing education: ecosystem transition. Integration of education. Vol. 24, No. 4, pp. 656-677.
16. Lamb, J., Carvalho, L., Gallagher, M. et al. (2022). The Postdigital Learning Spaces of Higher Education. Postdigit Sci Educ 4, 1-12 [Еlectronic resource] URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-021-00279-9. (дата обращения: 30.01.2026).
17. Mironov V.V. (2021). Digital construction of reality and the future of man // Philosophical Sciences. Vol. 64. No. 4, pp. 9-17.
18. Oleskin A.V., Kurdyumov V.S. (2018). Decentralized network structures in the scientific community, education system, civil society and business: Hiram's model // Economic strategies. No. 2б pp. 104-121.
19. Petrov Y. L., Petrova G. I. (2021). The value of trust as a «staple» of the corporate culture of a modern university // University Management: Practice and Analysis. Vol. 25, No. 1. pp. 107-116. DOI 10.15826/umpa.2021.01.008.
20. Rachkovskaya N. A., Smorchkova V. P., Mikhalkin N. V., Berkut V. P. (2025). The axiological foundations of training future teachers to foster a culture of family relations among adolescents // Modern Philosophical Research. No. 4. pp. 108-119. https://doi.org/10.18384/2949-5148-2025-4-108-119.
21. Rapanta, C., Botturi, L., Goodyear, P. et al. (2021). Balancing Technology, Pedagogy and the New Normal: Post-pandemic Challenges for Higher Education. Postdigit Sci Educ 3, 715–742 [Электронный ресурс] URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-021-00249-1. (дата обращения: 30.01.2026).
22. Rozin V.M. (2022). Cosmobiosocial reality: The End of modernity and the emergence of a future culture. Etudes-studies. Moscow: LANAND. 200 pages .
23. Sorina G.V., Meskov V.S. (2013). Socio-cultural dimension of the educational space // Values and meanings. No. 5, pp. 83-99.
24. Srnicek N., Williams A. (2019). Inventing the future: post-capitalism and a world without labor. Moscow: Strelka Press. 336 p
25. Suprun V.I. (1987). Values and social dynamics // Science and Values. Novosibirsk, (pp. 158-171). 240 p.
26. Varkhotov T. A. (2024). The unconventional nature of value // Patria. Vol. 1. No. 1. pp. 9-29.
27. Welzel K. (2018). The birth of freedom. Edited by E. D. Ponarin, O. A. Oberemko; translated from English by A. V. Lisovsky. Moscow: VTsIOM JSC. («CrossRoads» series) – 398 p.
Review
For citations:
Orlova I.V., Fokina L.V., Chernyshov B.A. Education in Russian and foreign discourses: contexts of the new era. Communicology. 2026;14(2):183-198. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21453/2311-3065-2026-14-2-183-198
Views:
20
JATS XML
Email this article 
