Stakeholders of the career guidance system in the field of healthcare
https://doi.org/10.21453/2311-3065-2026-14-2-199-211
Abstract
Professional orientation is becoming particularly important in the context of a shortage of personnel and competition for specialists, which is especially acute in the healthcare sector. However, the mechanisms used often lag behind the requirements of the branch, which requires the development of a scientifically based model. The purpose of the work is to substantiate the application of a stakeholder model for managing continuous career guidance in a medical cluster in the context of an optant’s career development for himself. Achieving the goal is ensured by a synthesis of constructivist and stakeholder approaches: the first defines the understanding of self-determination as a continuous reflexive careerbuilding process, the second allows you to identify key actors (optants, families, employers, educational institutions, authorities, medical communities) and build their interaction. Majority of experts confirm the validity of the selecting of these stakeholders and support the securing of the role of coordinator of their interaction for the profile medical university.
About the Authors
V. V. Zotov
Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Zotov Vitaliy Vladimirovich – Doctor of Social Sciences, Professor, Professor of Humanities & Social Sciences Center
Institutsky lane, 9, Dolgoprudny, Moscow region, 141701.
S. V. Cherney
Kursk State Medical University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Cherney Svetlana Valeryevna – Head of the Center for Pre-University Training and Career Guidance of the Institute of Continuing Education, Senior Lecturer at the Department of Social Work and Life Safety
Karl Marx St., 3, Kursk, 305041
References
1. Atkin, B., Skitmore, M. (2008). Editorial: Stakeholder management in construction. Construction Management and Economics, 26(6): 549-552.
2. Cardoso, P.M., Savickas, M.L., Gonçalves, M.M. (2020). Facilitating narrative change in career construction counseling. Journal of Career Development, 48: 1-14.
3. Clarkson, M.A. (1995). Stakeholder Framework for Analyzing and Evaluating Corporate Social Performance. Academy of Management Review. 20 (1): 92-117.
4. Dolzhenko, R.A., Dolzhenko, S.B. (2026). Stakeholder Approach to Vocational Guidance forYouth. Social & laborresearch. 62(l): 195-206. (in Rus.).
5. Freeman, R., Moutchnik, A. (2013). Stakeholder management and CSR: questions and answers. Umwelt Wirtschafts Forum, 21(1): 5-9.
6. Freeman, R.E. (1984). Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach. Marshfield, MA: Pitman Publishing.
7. Jones, T.M., Wicks, A.S. (1999). Convergent Stakeholder Theory. Academy of Management Review, 24(2): 853-886.
8. Kakotkina, E.A. (2019). Social functions of regional universities during the modernization of russian higher education. Society: Sociology, Psychology, Pedagogics, (58): 27–31. (in Rus.).
9. Kropivyanskaya S.O. (2023). On the issue of interaction of stakeholders of professional selfdetermination of adolescents. School and industry, (2): 43-50. (in Rus.).
10. Makovkina V., Semeykina I. (2016). Organization of stakeholder engagement as a factor in increasing the efficiency of corporate governance. Vestnik Universiteta, (7–8): 235-239. (in Rus.).
11. Minina E.V., Pavlenko E.S., Kiryushina M.A., Yakubovskaya A.A. (2021). Career counselling in today’s world: theory and practices in Russia and abroad. Moscow: Higher School of Economics, Institute of Education. (in Rus.).
12. Nagornov V., Perfilieva O. (2010). Assessing the role of higher education institutions in regional development for sustainable partnership for cooperation. International Organisations Research Journal, (4): 60-86. (in Rus.).
13. Parma,r B.L., Freeman, R.E., Harrison, J.S., Wicks, A.C., Purnell, L., De Colle S. (2010). Stakeholder Theory: The State of the Art. The Academy of Management Annals, 4(1): 403-445.
14. Petrov M.A. (2004). Theory of stakeholders: ways of practical application. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg State University. Management, 8(16): 51-68. (in Rus.).
15. Popova E.S. (2012). The mechanism of mutual influence of regional development trends and university strategies. Ars Administrandi, (2): 47-54. (in Rus.).
16. Savickas, M.L. (1997). Career adaptability: an integrative construct for life-span, life-space theory. The Career Development Quarterly, 45: 247-259.
17. Savickas, M.L. (2013). Career construction theory and practice. In R.W. Lent, S.D. Brown (Eds.), Career development and counseling: putting theory and research to work (2nd ed., pp. 147-183). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
18. Savvinov V., Strekalovsky V. (2013). Meeting Stakeholders’ Needs through Effective University Management. International organisations research journal. № 1(40). 87-99. (in Rus.).
19. Vodonosova, T.N., Klimko, A.A. (2021). The use of the stakeholder approach in the formation of the strategic governance concept of BNTU. In Engineering business: collection of materials of the II International Scientific and Practical Conference within the framework of the 19th International Scientific and Technical Conference of BNTU «Science for Education, Production and Economics». Minsk: BNTU (pp. 63-69). (in Rus.).
20. Wood, D., Jones, R. (1995). Stakeholder Mismatching: A Theoretical Problem on Empirical Research on Corporate Social Responsibility. The International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 3(3): 229-267.
21. Yekshikeev, T.K. (2009). Stakeholders of the educational services market. Siberian Trade and Economic Journal, (9): 106-109. (in Rus.).
Review
For citations:
Zotov V.V., Cherney S.V. Stakeholders of the career guidance system in the field of healthcare. Communicology. 2026;14(2):199-211. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21453/2311-3065-2026-14-2-199-211
Views:
5
JATS XML
Email this article 
