Political advertising on social networks: communicative strategies of manipulation for shaping the position of youth

In the context of digital transformation, political advertising on social media has become an interactive, hyper-targeted form based on surveillance capitalism. Young people with clip-thinking and a tendency to trust visual content and influencers are particularly vulnerable: 84% do not recognize manipulation. The goal is to identify manipulative strategies in political advertising targeting Russian youth and analyze how they are perceived. Material: posts and campaigns on VK and Telegram from 2023-2025. (communities «The Truth Is with Us!», «PROSTO», «The Workshop of New Media» accounts of nine pro-government and opposition bloggers) and a pilot survey (N=35, aged 18–35). Methods: discourse analysis, content analysis, linguistic analysis, questionnaires. Four strategies have been identified: constructing reality, polarization, emotional engagement, and technologically determined techniques. Their effectiveness is ensured by digital dialect: memes, short videos, paragraphemics. The cases demonstrate hybrid formats: myth-making and dysphemization in a patriotic project, soft co-optation through loyal bloggers, and masking the agenda as leisure content. Personalized content that imitates expert opinion generates the highest level of engagement. During the 2024 elections, critical narratives about the opposition predominated on social media, contrasting with the positive campaigning in the media. The survey confirmed the vulnerability: only 8.6 % fully recognized the manipulation; information presented as a personal opinion proved to be particularly challenging. The correspondence between advertising tools and the psychology of young people has been identified; unrecognition is a key factor in effectiveness.

1. Amiri L. P. (2013). Paragraphic means of language play as paralinguistic realities in advertising communication / L. P. Amiri // Bulletin of the Moscow State Pedagogical University. Series «Philology. Theory of Language. Language Education», pp. 69-75. (in Rus.).

2. Borodulina N. Yu., Makeeva M. N., Gulyaev E. A. (2017). Lingu istic tools in promoting viral advertising / N. Yu. Borodulina, M. N. Makeeva, E. A. Gulyaev // Philological Sciences. Issues of Theory and Practice. Vol. 9, No. 9 (75). Part 1, pp. 87-89. (in Rus.).

3. Chudinov A. P. (2006). Political linguistics: textbook. Manu al / A. P. Chudinov. Moscow: Flinta: Nauka, 256 p. (in Rus.).

4. Dobber T., Kruikemeier S., Helberger N., Goodman E. (2024). Protecting Citizens? Understanding the Impact of Political Advertising Transparency] / T. Dobber, S. Kruikemeier, S. Helberger, E. Goodman // New Media & Society. Vol. 26, No 11. P. 16-35.

5. Dobrosklonskaya, T. G. (2020). Media Linguistics: Theory, Methods, Directions / T. G. Dobrosklonskaya. Moscow: [n. p.], 180 p. (in Rus.).

6. Dotsenko, E. L. (1997). Psychology of Manipulation: Phenomena, Mechanisms, and Defenses / E. L. Dotsenko. Moscow: CheRo, 344 p. (in Rus.).

7. Fedotkina E. I. (2013). Linguistic Means of Argumentation Development in the Publicistic Style / E. I. Fedotkina // Bulletin of the Kamchatka State Technical University, pp. 44-46. (in Rus.).

8. Gavra D. P. (2011). Fundamentals of Communication Theory: a textbook. Third Generation Standard / D. P. Gavra. Saint Petersburg: Piter, 288 p. (in Rus.).

9. Glukhov A. P. (2020). Social Network Digital Literacy: Towards a Conceptual Foundation / A. P. Glukhov // Bulletin of Udmurt University. Series «Philosophy. Psychology. «Pedagogy», pp. 380-389. (in Rus.).

10. Kazakova V. I., Khudyakov M. V. (2012). Modern Russian youth as an object of stratification analysis / V. I. Kazakova, M. V. Khudyakov // Proceedings of the Nizhny Novgorod State Technical University named after R. E. Alekseev, рp. 304-309. (in Rus.).

11. Khaibulaeva A. G. (2025). Psychological Characteristics of the Personality of a Modern Student / A. G. Khaibulaeva // Problems of Modern Pedagogical Education, рp. 478-481. (in Rus.).

12. Lazaryan S. S., Botasheva A. K., Koblev S. R. (2023). Political online advertising: main research paradigms / S. S. Lazaryan, A. K. Botasheva, S. R. Koblev // Modern Science and Innovations. No. 4 (44), рp. 231-238. . (in Rus.).

13. Lukyanova G. V., Solovyov A. Yu. (2024). Features of agenda-setting in the Telegram messenger / G. V. Lukyanova, A. Yu. Solovyov // Izvestiya of Saratov University. New Series. Series: Sociology. Political Science. Vol. 24, issue 1, рp. 90-97 (in Rus.).

14. Matthes J., Marquart F. (2015). The Effects of Proand Counterattitudinal Advertising on Political Participation] / J. Matthes, F. Marquart // Communication Research, рр. 135–155.

15. McLuhan, M. (2003). Understanding Media: The Extensions of Man / M. McLuhan; translated from English by V. Nikolaev; concluding article by M. Vavilov. Moscow; Zhukovsky: KANON-press-C: Kuchkovo Pole, 464 p. (in Rus.).

16. Murashova E. P. (2021). The role of cognitive metaphor in the hybridization of marketing and political discourses: an analysis of English-language political advertising / E. P. Murashova // Education, Language and Culture. Vol. 5, No. 2, рp. 22-36. (in Rus.).

17. Nazaykin A. N. (2021). Social media in modern media relations / A. N. Nazaykin // PR and Advertising in a Changing World: Regional aspect, рp. 37-45. (in Rus.).

18. Peshkova N. P., Gilyazova D. R. (2020). Analysis of some trends in the processes of perception and understanding of mass media texts (based on the material of internet communication) / N. P. Peshkova, D. R. Gilyazova // Bulletin of PNIPU. Problems of linguistics and pedagogy, рp. 8-24. (in Rus.).

19. Radyuk A. V. (2013). Communicative strategies as a method of manipulative speech influence in English business discourse / A. V. Radyuk // Bulletin of the Leningrad State University named after A. S. Pushkin, рp. 181-190. (in Rus.).

20. Shapirova R. R. (2010). Socio-political portrait of student youth in the process of forming civic consciousness / R. R. Shapirova // Vestnik ChGPU. «Pedagogy and Psychology», рp. 193-201. (in Rus.).

21. Sharkov F.I., Potapchuk V.A., Golushko I.I. (2025). Innovations in the media industry: new media and artificial intelligence. Communicology. Vol. 13. No. 1, рp. 13-24. (in Rus.).

22. Sharkov F.I., Tikhonchuk A.A. (2025). Artificial intelligence and current challenges to the media, civil society, and the state. Bulletin of the Volzhsky University named after V.N. Tatishchev. No. 7 (116), рp. 91-104. (in Rus.).

23. Sheigal E. I. (2000). Semiotics of Political Discourse / E. I. Sheigal. Volgograd: Peremena, 404 p. (in Rus.).

24. Slugina Yu. N. (2015). Marketing communications in social networks: problems and prospects / Yu. N. Slugina // Bulletin of the Financial University, рp. 130-134. (in Rus.).

25. Snezhkova I. A. (2023). Paralinguistic means in media texts / I. A. Snezhkova // Modern Pedagogical Education, рp. 255-259. (in Rus.).

26. Stepanova N. V. (2025). Essential characteristics of media-political discourse / N. V. Stepanova // Discourse. Vol. 11, No. 1, рp. 138-154. (in Rus.).

27. Suslov I. V., Knizhova Z. Z. (2025). Digitalization and de-ideologization: the evolution of political socialization of Zoomers / I. V. Suslov, Z. Z. Knizhova // Discourse-Pi. Vol. 22, No. 2, рp. 108-125. (in Rus.).

28. Topuria E. (2023). Semiotics of Political Discourse Analysis of Political Advertising in Translation] / E. Topuria //Short Communication, рр. 309-316.

29. Torochkova P. A. (2014). Social networks as an element of information technology a new actor in world politics / P. A. Torochkova // Bulletin of the Russian State University for the Humanities. Series “Political Science. History. «International Relations», pp. 117-126. (in Rus.).

30. Tsvetkov V. A., Dudin M. N. (2020). Media activity of domestic politicians and public figures during the COVID-19 pandemic as a tool for strengthening the electorate’s trust / V. A. Tsvetkov, M. N. Dudin // Leadership and Management, рp. 90-121. (in Rus.).

31. Van Drunen M. Z. (2022). The European Approach to Regulating Political Advertising: The Political Advertising Regulation (RPA)/ M. Z. Van Drunen. International Journal of Law and Information Technology, рр.1-19.

32. Vildanova K. I., Vildanova E. M. (2024). The language of political advertising as a tool of political influence / K. I. Vildanova, E. M. Vildanova // Reports of the Scientific Society, pp. 81-86. (in Rus.).

33. Volodenkov S. V., Belokonev S. Yu., Suslova A. A. (2021). Features of the structure of information consumption among modern Russian youth: based on research materials among political science students at the Financial University / S. V. Volodenkov, S. Yu. Belokonev, A. A. Suslova // Bulletin of RUDN University. Series: Political Science, pp. 31-45 . (in Rus.).

34. Yakunin S. A. (2019). Linguistic Means of Conducting Information Warfare / S. A. Ya kunin // Political Linguistics. No. 3 (75), рp. 77-82. (in Rus.).

35. Zuboff S. (2019). The Age of Surveillance Capitalism: The Fight for a Human Future at the New Frontier of Power / S. Zuboff. New York: PublicAffairs, 717 p.