Preview

Communicology

Advanced search

Trademarks in the Light of the Thomas Theorem: a model of a social object ontology

https://doi.org/10.21453/2311-3065-2020-8-2-156-167

Abstract

The paper considers the reasons for the existence of trademarks as a social phenomenon. The authors reveal three dominant functional explanations: rationalistic, stratification and semantic. A rationalistic model describes a trademark in terms of identifying the source of the goods (the trademark allows the consumer to identify the goods of a particular manufacturer). The stratification explanation defines the function of the trademark in terms of demonstratively maintaining social differentiation and the distribution of prestige. The semantic approach focuses on the trademark as a mental cell in the consumer’s memory archive, which contains information about the product and its associations. All three approaches are characterized by common problems of functional explanation, namely: the logical circle and internal connection with the homeostatic image of the social system. To overcome these problems, the authors propose an approach to the social ontology of trademarks based on the well-known “Thomas theorem”, which allows to establish causal relationships between the subjective and objective world on the basis of the postulation of equality between reality and perception at the level of formation of human actions. The authors demonstrate the explanatory power of the “Thomas theorem” on example of self-fulfilling prophecies that can be observed in the practice of using trademarks, considering the rationalistic, prestigious and semantic functions of trademarks through the prism of this principle

About the Authors

N. S. Babich
Federal Center of Theoretical and Applied Sociology of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation


I. V. Batykov
Federal Center of Theoretical and Applied Sociology of the Russian Academy of Sciences
Russian Federation


References

1. Аакер Д. (2003). Создание сильных брендов. М.: Издательский дом Гребенникова.

2. Бауман З. (2008). Текучая современность. СПб.: Питер.

3. Бодрийяр Ж. (2006). Общество потребления. М.: Республика.

4. Будон Р. (1998). Социальные механизмы без «черных ящиков» // Социология на пороге XXI века / под ред. С.И. Григорьева. М.: Интеллект. С. 109-128.

5. Веркман К.Д. (1986). Товарные знаки. М.: Прогресс.

6. Веселов Ю.В. (1998). Экономическая социология постмодерна // Журнал социологии и социальной антропологии. № 1. С. 72-80.

7. Гофман И. (2003). Анализ фреймов: эссе об организации повседневного опыта. М.: Институт социологии РАН.

8. Гумплович Л. (2010). Основы социологии. М.: Либроком.

9. Дюркгейм Э. (1991). О разделении общественного труда. Метод социологии. М.: Наука.

10. Ельмслев Л. (2006). Пролегомены к теории языка. М.: КомКнига.

11. Ильин В.И. (2005). Общество потребления: теоретическая модель и российская реальность // Мир России. Социология. Этнология. №. 2. С. 3-40.

12. Келлер К.Л. (2005). Стратегический брэнд-менеджмент. М.: Вильямс.

13. Мертон Р. (2006). Социальная теория и социальная структура. М.: АСТ.

14. Ритцер Д. (2011). Макдональдизация общества 5. М.: Праксис.

15. Смит Г.В. (2010). Оценка товарных знаков. М.: Квинто-консалтинг.

16. Сорокин П.А. (1920). Система социологии. Т. 1. Петроград: Колос.

17. Тернер Д. (1985). Структура социологической теории. М.: Прогресс.

18. Чармэссон Г. (1999). Торговая марка. СПб.: Питер.

19. Чернатони Л., МакДональд М. (2006). Как создать мощный бренд. М.: Юнити-Дана.

20. Ball D.W. (1972). ‘The definition of situation’: Some theoretical and methodological consequences of taking W.I. Thomas seriously // Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour. No. 1. P. 61-82.

21. Coombe R.J. (1996). Embodied trademarks: Mimesis and alterity on American commercial frontiers // Cultural anthropology. No. 2. P. 202-224.

22. Coombe R.J. (1998). The cultural life of intellectual properties: Authorship, appropriation, and the law. Durham: Duke University Press.

23. Crutch S.J., Warrington E.K. (2004). The semantic organisation of proper nouns: the case of people and brand names // Neuropsychologia. No. 5. P. 584-596.

24. Dreyfuss R.C. (1989). Expressive genericity: trademarks as language in the Pepsi generation // Notre Dame law review. No. 3. P. 397-424.

25. Giddens A. (1993). New rules of sociological method. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

26. Gontijo P.F.D., Zhang S. (2007). The mental representation of brand names: Are brand names a class by themselves? // Psycholinguistic phenomena in marketing communications / Ed. by T.M. Lowrey. New-Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. P. 23-37.

27. Grassi W. (1998). The reality of brands: towards an ontology of marketing // American journal of economics and sociology. No. 2. P. 313-359.

28. Hedström P. (2005). Dissecting the social: on the principles of analytical sociology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

29. Holt D.B. (2006). Toward a sociology of branding // Journal of consumer culture. No. 3. P. 299-302.

30. Hovland R., Wolburg J.M. (2015). Advertising, society, and consumer culture. London: Routledge.

31. Isajiw W.W. (1998). Causation and functionalism in sociology. London: Routledge.

32. Kim J. (1993). Supervenience and mind. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

33. Lantos G.P. (2010). Consumer behavior in action. London: ME Sharpe.

34. Mendonça S., Pereira T.S., Godinho M.M. (2004). Trademarks as an indicator of innovation and industrial change // Research policy. No. 9. P. 1385-1404.

35. Metzinger T. (2003). Being no one: the self-model theory of subjectivity. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.

36. Richardson G.P. (1991). Feedback thought in social science and systems theory. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.

37. Schutz A., Luckmann T. (1989). The structures of the life-world. Vol. 2. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.

38. Sztompka P. (1991). Society in action: the theory of social becoming. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

39. Tarde G. (1898). Etudes de psychologie sociale. Paris: Giard et Briere.

40. Thomas W.I., Thomas D.S. (1928). The child in America. New York: Knopf.

41. Varela C. (2009). Science for humanism: the recovery of human agency. London: Routledge.

42. West D.J., Walk A. (1977). Daniel McNaughton: His trial and the aftermath. Ashford: Headley


Review

For citations:


Babich N.S., Batykov I.V. Trademarks in the Light of the Thomas Theorem: a model of a social object ontology. Communicology. 2020;8(2):155-166. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21453/2311-3065-2020-8-2-156-167

Views: 153


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2311-3065 (Print)
ISSN 2311-3332 (Online)