Расширенный поиск

Коммуникационные режимы как новая научная категория

Полный текст:


В статье вводится в научный оборот новая категория «коммуникационный режим», рассматриваются особенности формирования и развития страновых коммуникационных режимов. Авторы рассказывают о некоторых аспектах методологии исследования коммуникационных режимов (необходимость моделирования «идеального типа» для сравнительного анализа). Статья содержит результаты исследования коммуникационных режимов, инициированного и впервые проведенного Национальным исследовательским институтом развития коммуникации (Россия).

Об авторах

В. И. Гасумянов
Национальный исследовательский институт развития коммуникаций

В. В. Комлева
Национальный исследовательский институт развития коммуникаций

Список литературы

1. Akopov G.L. (2013). Internet and politics. Modernization of the political system based on innovative political Internet communications. Moscow: KNORUS (In Rus.).

2. Barber M. (2011). Order to achieve the result. Moscow (In Rus.) Beck U. (2001). What is globalization. Moscow.

3. Bell D. (1973). The Coming of Post-Industrial Society. A Venture in Social Forecasting. N.Y.

4. Bell D. (1986). Social framework of information society / New postindustrial wave in the West. Moscow. P. 330-342 (In Rus.).

5. Brzezinski Z. (1971). Between Two Ages. America’s Role in the Technotronic Era. N.Y.

6. Brzezinski Z. (2012). Strategic Vision: America and the Crisis of Global Power. Basic Books.

7. Castells M. (1998). The Information Age: Economy, Society and Culture: End of Millennium. Malden - Oxford: Blackwell Publ.

8. Castells M. (1999). Power of identity. In: The new postindustrial wave in the West. P. 494-505. Moscow (In Rus.).

9. Castells M. (2000). Information age: economy, society, culture. Moscow (In Rus.).

10. Castells M. (2000). Russia and network society. World of Russia. No. 1.

11. Castells M. (2004). The Network Society: A Cross-Cultural Perspective. Cheltenham - Northampton: Edward Edgar.

12. Castells M. (2016). Power of communication. Moscow (In Rus.).

13. Davis R. (2009). Typing Politics: the Role of Blogs in American Politics / R. Davis (ed.). Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press.

14. Drucker P.F. (1995). Post-Capitalist Society. N.Y.: Harper-Collins Publ.

15. Etzioni A. (2001). The Monochrome Society. Princeton: Princeton University Press Moscow (In Russ).

16. Fukuyama F. (2006). State-Building: Governance and World Order in the 21st century. Мoscow: AST (In Rus.).

17. Gaman-Golutvina O.V., Smorgunov L.V., Timofeeva L.N. (eds.) (2018). Development policy, state and world order: Materials of the VIII all-Russian Congress of political scientists, Moscow, December 6-8, 2018. Publishing house ‘Aspect Press’. P. 593-594 (In Rus.).

18. Habermas J. (1992). Theory of communicative action: summary abstract / Modern Western theoretical sociology, Moscow. Issue 1, P. 57-101 (In Rus.).

19. Habermas J. (2016). Structural change in the public sphere: Research on categories of bourgeois society. Moscow (In Rus.).

20. Herman E.S., Chomsky N. (1988). Production of consent: political economy of mass media. Moscow (In Russ).

21. Inozemtsev V.L. (1990). Prospects of postindustrial theory in the changing world // New postindustrial wave in the West: anthology, Moscow: Academia (In Rus.).

22. Inozemtsev V.L. (2000). Modern post-industrial society: nature, contradictions, prospects. Study guide for university students. Moscow: Logos (In Rus.).

23. Katz R.L. (1988). The Information Society: An International Perspective. N.Y.

24. Keane J. (2015). Democracy and decadence media. Moscow: Publishing house of the Higher School of Economics (In Rus.).

25. Masuda Y. (1981). The Information Society as Post-Industrial Society. Washington.

26. Masuda Y. (1983). The Information Society as Postindustrial Society. Washington: World Future Soc.

27. McLuhan M. (2003). Understanding media: external extensions of a person. M.: Zhukovsky (In Rus.).

28. McLuhan M. (2004). The Gutenberg Galaxy. Kyiv (In Rus.).

29. McLuhan M., Fiore Q. (1967). The Medium is the Message: An Inventory of Effects. N.Y.: Random House.

30. Noelle-Neumann E. (1996). Public opinion. Discovery of the spiral of silence. Moscow.

31. Ortega y Gasset H. (1989). The revolt of the masses. Question of philosophy. No. 3-4.

32. Parenti M. (1990). Democracy for the few / transl. Moscow (In Rus.).

33. Porat M., Rubin M. (1978). The Information Economy: Development and Measurement. Washington.

34. Robertson R. (1992). Globalization: Social Theory and Global Culture. London.

35. Robertson R., Lechner F. (1985). Modernization, Globalization and the Problem of Culture in World-Systems Theory. Theory, Culture & Society. Vol. II. No. 3.

36. Schiller G. (1980). Manipulators of consciousness. Moscow (In Rus).

37. Sharkov F.I. (2010). Communicology: fundamentals of communication theory. M.: Publishing and trading Corporation ‘Dashkov & Co.’.

38. Smorgunov L.V., Sherstobitov A.S. (2014). Political networks: theory and methods of analysis. Textbook. Moscow (In Rus.).

39. Stonier T. (1983). The Wealth of Information. London.

40. Stonier T. (1986). The wealth of information: a profile of the post-industrial economy. In: New technocratic wave in the West. Moscow. P. 392-409 (In Rus.).

41. Tapscott D., Williams A. (2008). Wikinomics: How Mass Collaboration Changes Everything. Moscow (In Rus.).

42. Toffler A. (2010). The third wave. Moscow (In Rus.).

43. Vasilkova V.V., Verbitskaya L.A. (eds.) (2009). Society of knowledge: from idea to practice. Collective monograph. Social communications in the society of knowledge. SPb. (In Rus.)


Для цитирования:

Гасумянов В.И., Комлева В.В. Коммуникационные режимы как новая научная категория. Коммуникология. 2020;8(3):43-50.

For citation:

Gasumyanov V.I., Komleva V.V. Communication Regimes as a New Scientific Category. Communicology. 2020;8(3):43-50. (In Russ.)

Просмотров: 144

Creative Commons License
Контент доступен под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

ISSN 2311-3065 (Print)
ISSN 2311-3332 (Online)