The Ontological Rootedness of Cognitive Practices Linguistic Forms in Religious Socio-Cultural Traditions: a comparative approach

This study examines the ontological problems in the aspect of the ratio of different cognitive practices and their mutual conditionality in the context of communication and their socio-cultural prerequisites, which is possible only if the traditional approach to the distinction between epistemology and faith is revised. Based on the idea of identity of common grounds of cognitive practices “belief” is included in the understanding of interpretation in the communicative situation for true knowledge in each of the modes of being. Belief in the philosophical tradition reveals the ontological foundations of hermeneutics. Three reflections are synthesised: the hermeneutic concept of understanding, the structuralist concept of language, and the psychoanalytic concept of personality. It is necessary to apply the method of phenomenological reduction to the ontological substantiation of hermeneutics in the Christian Orthodox tradition. Hence, the very natural seems the meeting of semantics, linguistics, and onomatodoxy, with the ontology language of Heidegger, the origins of which resides in in Husserl phenomenology. Fundamental ontology and linguistics, cult philosophy - both in different ways open the horizons of substantiation of hermeneutics. The beginning of this justification is the hermeneutic problem in Christianity, which has appeared as a sequence of the question of the relationship between the two Covenants, or two Unions. In the paper, the author attempts to identify the stages of constructing the philosophical concept of Pavel Florensky. As a result, the substantiation of the birth of the world in consciousness by the cult is revealed. Ontological tradenote words can be seen in Florensky through symbols. The symbol makes the transition from a small energy to a larger one, from a small information saturation to a greater one, acting as a lumen of being - when by the name we hear the reality. The word comes into contact with the world that is on the other side of our own psychological state. The word, the symbol shifts all the time from subjective to objective. The communicative model acts as a common point uniting these traditions. The religious approach as part of semiotic approach reveals the horizons of ontological conditionality of language and words, and among the words - the name, as the name plays a central role in the accumulation and transmission of information, understanding of the commonality of this conditionality in the concepts of phenomenology and Christian, Orthodox tradition.

ontological problems, culture, cognitive practices, religious tradition

1. Беньямин В. (1996). Произведение искусства в эпоху его технической воспроизводимости. М.: Культурный центр имени Гете; Медиум.

2. Гуссерль Э. (2004). Кризис европейских наук и трансцендентная феноменология. СПб.: Владимир Даль.

3. Иванов В.В. (1910). Заветы символизма // Аполлон. №8. С. 5-20.

4. Иммуратов А.Т., Омельянчик В.И. (1983). Контекст знания и пресуппозция // Пути формирования нового знания в современной науке. Киев. С. 82-98.

5. Лейбниц Г. В. (1982). Сочинения. В 4 т. т. 1. М.: Мысль.

6. Мальшина Н.А. (2017). Культура, сознание, творчество и креативность: компаративистский подход // Интеллект. Инновации. Инвестиции. № 10. С. 51-54.

7. Микешина Л.А. (2008). Философия познания. Проблемы эпистемологии гуманитарного знания. Издание 2-е, дополненное. Москва.

8. Пиотровский Р.Г. (1985). Лингвистические уроки машинного перевода // Вопросы языкознания. № 4. С. 18-27.

9. Половинкин С.М. (2001). П.А. Флоренский: Логос против Хаоса // П.А. Флоренский: pro et contra. СПб.

10. Рикер П. (2008). Конфликт интерпретаций. Очерки о герменевтике. Перевод с французского, вступ. ст. и коммент. И.С. Вдовиной М.: Академический Проект.

11. Слинин Я.А. (2001). Эдмунд Гуссерль и его Картезианские размышления / Э. Гуссерль Картезианские размышления. С-Пб.

12. Флоренский П. (2004). Философия культа (Опыт православной антроподицеи). Москва: Мысль.

13. Флоренский П.А. (1909). Общечеловеческие корни идеализма // Богословский вестник. № 2. С. 29-32.

14. Хайдеггер М. (2003). Бытие и Время. Харьков: «Фолио».

15. Хайдеггер М. (1989). О сущности истины // Философские науки. № 4. С. 96-99.

16. Шюц А. (1988). Структура повседневного мышления // Социологические исследования. № 2. С. 135-137.