The Communicative Function of Phonetic Units in Russian Futurist Poetry
https://doi.org/10.21453/2311-3065-2021-9-1-42-52
Abstract
The paper examines the historical connection of phonetics with general linguistics, and reveals why this area of linguistics did not develop neither consistently, nor simultaneously in the structure of philological sciences. Attention is paid to the modern media-text approach to such an area of phonetics as intonation; the latter, in turn, is viewed as part of communication theory. It is hypothesized that such an attitude to sound, to the phoneme, has already been considered among the Futurists, Dadaists, Lettrists, Budelyans and Oberiuts, who interpreted sounds as an unknowable phenomenon that is beyond the cognition of the mind. Here the place and the pragmatic role of modern science on current approaches to phonetics in communicology is determined, where intonation does not refer to either cognitive science or paralinguistics, but, at the same time, unites these two areas of practical speech production. It is hypothetically assumed that such approaches were realized by some representatives of trends and schools of the direction of modernism of the early twentieth century.
About the Author
E. V. Koydan
Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration (RANEPA)
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Koydan Elizaveta Valerievna – student of the Faculty of Journalism, Institute of Public Administration and Civil Service
Moscow
References
1. Ball H. (2010). Flight from time. Ed., introductory article, compil., transl. and notes V. Sedelnik. Moscow (In Rus.).
2. Burliuk D.D. (1994). Fragments from the memoirs of a futurist. Letters. Poems. SPb.: Pushkin Foundation (In Rus.).
3. Ganiev Zh.V. (2013). On the basics of teaching Russian phonetics. Russian language at school. No. 2 (In Rus.).
4. Kruchenykh A.E. (1923). Apocalypse in Russian literature. The devil and the talkers. Secret vices of academicians. The word as such. Declarations. Moscow (In Rus.).
5. Panov M.V. (1967). Russian phonetics. M.: Education (In Rus.).
6. Potapov V.V. (2005). Phonetic units of Russian speech: Status and functions. INION RAS. Moscow (In Rus.).
7. Khlebnikov V. (1986). Creations. Ed. and introductory article M.Y. Polyakov; compil. by V.P. Grigoriev and A.E. Parnis. M.: Soviet writer (In Rus.).
8. Khromov S.S. (2011). Multifunctional analysis of Russian intonation in language and speech at the beginning of the XXI century. Yaroslavl Pedagogical Bulletin (Humanities). No. 4. Vol. 1 (In Rus.).
9. Sharkov F.I. (2014). Sociology of social communications in the context of the development of the scientific direction “Communicology”. Communicology. Vol. 7. No. 5. P. 15-26.
10. Yuriev O. (2008). Filled gap-2. Book review: Gennady Gor. Blockade: Poems / Transl. from Russian with parallel text. Vienna: UFO.
11. Janecek G. (1986). A Zaum ‘Classification. Canadian-American Slavic Studies. Vol. 20, No. 1-2. R. 37-54 / Russian transl.: Zaumi classification // Word. Tambov: Tambov state. un-t, 1996.
12. Marinetti F.T. (1909). Fondazione e manifesto del futurism [access mode]: https://it.wikisource.org/wiki/I_Manifesti_del_futurismo/Fondazione_e_Manifesto_del_futurismo.
Review
For citations:
Koydan E.V. The Communicative Function of Phonetic Units in Russian Futurist Poetry. Communicology. 2021;9(1):42-52. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21453/2311-3065-2021-9-1-42-52
Views:
208
Email this article 
