Discourse of Gender Asymmetry in Social Media: methodology of research
https://doi.org/10.21453/2311-3065-2021-9-1-67-78
Abstract
The paper highlights the problem of gender stereotypes and gender stratification and provides the description of constructionism and discourse analysis as the methodological foundations of gender studies. Gender is viewed as both a social construct and discursive practice. The author proposes a specific methodology for discourse analysis that takes into account the specifics of social media. The methods of research include analysis of linguistic data, processed through the lens of constructionist analysis, discourse and content analysis. The author grounds the study on M. Foucault’s approach that influenced discursive and constructionist studies. The features of the articulation of the topic are shown based on materials of the social network VKontakte. The author reveals the discursive techniques, with the help of which indicates the position and role of the subject. In social networks, unlike other media discourses, the problem of gender relations is expressed exaggeratedly. With the traditional spectrum of plots for stereotyping, the network newspeak is prone to use language play and genre fusion. Hence, the polar features of gender discourse in the network space should be noted: the coexistence of aggressive orthodox patriarchal judgments with sarcastic rethinking of gender roles and the manifestation of egalitarianism in the interpretation of masculinity and femininity. Gender discourse is represented as an element of ideological discourse that the author designates as modern newspeak, which is characterized by the ability to politicize any aspect of culture and strive for domination.
Keywords
newspeak,
gender,
construct,
stereotype,
discourse,
constructionism,
social networks,
violence,
Foucault
About the Author
A. M. Oleshkova
Nizhny Tagil State Socio-Pedagogical Institute (NTSSPI), Branch of the Russian State Vocational Pedagogical University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Oleshkova Anna Mikhailovna – Cand. Sc. (Hist.), associate professor, Dept. of Humanities and Social Studies
622031, Nizhniy Tagil, Krasnogvardeiskaya str., 57
References
1. Berger P. (1995). Social construction of reality. Treatise on the Sociology of Knowledge / Thansl. M .: Medium (In Rus.).
2. Canetti E. (2012). Mass and power. Transl. L.G. Ionina. M.: Astrel (In Rus.).
3. Foucault M. (2005). Abnormal: A course of lectures given at the Collège de France in the 1974- 1975 school year / Transl. SPb.: Science (In Rus.).
4. Foucault M. (2010). History of Madness in the Classical Era / Transl. I.K. Staf. M.: AST (In Rus.).
5. Foucault M. (2015). Discipline and Punish. The birth of the prison / Transl. M.: Ad Marginem Press (In Rus.).
6. Hamilton D.L., Sherman J.W. (1994). Stereotypes. Handbook of Social Cognition. Vol.2: Applications. R.S. Wyer, Т.К. Srall (Eds.). Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
7. Kirilina A.V., ed. (2005). Gender and Language. Moscow state linguistic university; Laboratory for Gender Studies. M.: Languages of Slavic culture (In Rus.).
8. Lovink G. (2019). Critical Theory of the Internet. Moscow: Ad Maringham Press, Garage Museum of Contemporary Art (In Rus.).
9. McConnell-Ginet S. (2011). Gender, Sexuality, and Meaning Linguistic Practice and Politics: Linguistic practice and politics (Studies in Language and Gender). Oxford: Oxford University Press. P. xii+297.
10. Merton R. (2006). Social theory and social structure. M.: AST (In Rus.).
11. Merton R.K. (1995). The Thomas Theorem and the Matthew Effect. Social Forces. Vol.74. Oxford University Press.
12. Musolff A. (2021). National Conceptualisations of the Body Politic. Cultural Experience and Political Imagination. School of Politics, Philosophy and Language and Communication Studies University of East Anglia Norwich, UK
13. Nietzsche F. (2014). Genealogy of morality / Transl. SPb.: Publishing group Lenizdat, Team A (In Rus.).
14. Ryabova T.B., Ryabov O.V. (2013). Geyrope: Gender Dimension of the Image of Europe in the Practices of Political Mobilization. Woman in Russian Society. No. 3 (In Rus.).
15. Schutz A. (2003). The semantic structure of the everyday world: essays on phenomenological sociology / Ed. I. Alkhasov; Transl. I. Alkhasova, N. Mazlumyanova, G. Batygin. M.: Institute of the Public Opinion Foundation (In Rus.).
16. Shim D., Stengel F.A. (2017). Social media, gender and the mediatization of war: exploring the German armed forces’ visual representation of the Afghanistan operation on Facebook. Global Discourse: An interdisciplinary journal of current affairs. Vol. 7. No.2-3. P. 330-347 (18).
17. Tajfel H., Turner J.C. (1986). The social identity theory of intergroup behavior. In: Psychology of intergroup relations / S. Worchel, W.G Austin (Eds.). Chicago, IL: Nelson-Hall Publishers.
18. Ulanovsky A.M. (2009). Constructivism, radical constructivism, social constructionism: the world as interpretation. Questions of psychology. No. 2 (In Rus.).
19. Van Dijk T. (2013). Discourse and Power: Representation of Dominance in Language and Communication / Transl. M.: LIBROKOM (In Rus.).
Review
For citations:
Oleshkova A.M. Discourse of Gender Asymmetry in Social Media: methodology of research. Communicology. 2021;9(1):67-78. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21453/2311-3065-2021-9-1-67-78
Views:
328
Email this article 
