“Priority 2030” in the Context of the Development of Social Institutions in Russia
https://doi.org/10.21453/2311-3065-2021-9-3-155-164
Abstract
The relevance of the article is associated by the author with the complex socioeconomic, political realities in which modern Russian society finds itself. The author turns to the category “social time” to characterize the changes in various spheres of society’s life. Focusing on such modern trends as digitalization, commercialization, atomization of society and the individual, the author turns to the category of “human capital”, designed to smooth out the indicated negative phenomena and restore the integrity of the social communications system. As a confirmation of the importance of human capital development at the state level, the article analyzes the fundamental doctrinal documents in the area under consideration. The author is elected for understanding the Priority-2030 program as an urgent initiative aimed, among other things, at building up human capital with the help of the education system. The author analyzes various authors’ positions in order to identify threats that impede the development of human capital within the education system. The methodological basis of the study was the methods of content analysis of the works of leading researchers, as well as discourse analysis of publications in the media and information resources. Analysis of the regulatory framework, as well as significant research platforms, allowed us to conclude that the principles of commercialization, digitalization, and bureaucratization prevail in the modern educational paradigm. At the same time, national priorities for building up human capital require a value-semantic foundation, which culture and educational activities are capable of providing.
About the Author
V. V. StetsenkoRussian Federation
Stetsenko Vladimir Vadimovich – lecturer of the Department of Sectoral Legal Disciplines
347936, Taganrog, Initiativnaya st., 48
References
1. Beck W. (2000). Risk Society: Towards a Different Modernity (Transl.). M.: Progress-Tradition (In Rus.).
2. Becker G.S. (1992) Human Capital: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis with Special Reference to Education. Chicagо, London.
3. Chuprov A.S. Ezri G.K. (2015). Social Time: Concept or Reality? Society and power. No. 6 (56). P. 7-15 (In Rus.).
4. Delyagin M.G. (2019). End of an era: watch out, doors open! Volume 1. General theory of globalization. 12th ed., revised and enlarged. Moscow (In Rus.).
5. Dzhurinskiy A.N. (2018). Higher education in the modern world: trends and problems. M.: Prometheus (In Rus.).
6. Oganisyan Y.S., ed. (2011). Modernization and politics in the XXI century. Institute of Sociology RAS. Moscow: Russian Political Encyclopedia (ROSSPEN) (In Rus.).
7. Ovchinnikov A.I., Mamychev A.Y., Baranov P.P. (2017). Fundamentals of National Security. M.: INFRA-M (In Rus.).
8. Primakov E.M. (2011). Thinking outloud. M.: Rossiyskaya Gazeta (In Rus.).
9. Sadovaya E.S. Sautkina V.A., Zenkov A.R. (2019). Formation of a new social reality: technological challenges. Moscow (In Rus.).
10. Schultz T.W. (1971) Investment in Human Capital: The Role of Education and of Research. New York.
11. Shtompel O.M. (2018). Innovation as a global development trend. Rostov-on-Don (In Rus.)
12. Sorokin P.A., Merton R.K. (2004). Social time: experience of methodological and functional analysis (Transl.). Social Studies (Socis). No. 6. P. 112-119 (In Rus.).
13. Starostin A.M. (2021). New Philosophy of the Global Peace: Problem Representation. Moscow: Mini Type (In Rus.).
Review
For citations:
Stetsenko V.V. “Priority 2030” in the Context of the Development of Social Institutions in Russia. Communicology. 2021;9(3):155-164. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21453/2311-3065-2021-9-3-155-164