Forms of Interaction in the Conditions of Social Reality Management: Dramatic metaphor by B.W. Pierce and V.E. Kronen
https://doi.org/10.21453/2311-3065-2022-10-1-29-40
Abstract
The article represents the author’s approach to the study of various forms of interactions manifested when using the «dramatic metaphor» by B.W. Pierce and V.E. Kronen in the conditions of social reality management. The sources of the appearance and specificity of the «dramatic metaphor» within the framework of the theory of coordinated management of meaning are shown; the possibilities of this metaphor in line with the management of the social reality of traditional and modern society on the basis of a communication approach are noted. The methodological basis of the research is the works of (a) A.A. Gritsanov, representing social reality in the context of intersubjectivity; (b) B.W. Pierce and V.E. Kronen, who developed a hierarchical model of the organization of the meanings of actors; (c) F.I. Sharkov, who highlighted the specifics of managing the social reality of mass society. Based on the conducted research, the author concludes that the forms of interaction developed under the conditions of using a «dramatic metaphor» can contribute to the formation of management as a tool for competent modeling of the social reality of modern society.
About the Author
T. V. Andriyanova
Kursk State University
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
CandSc (Sociol.), associate professor at the Department of Sociology,
305004, Kursk, Radishchev st., 29
References
1. Andriyanova T.V. (2019). Research potential of the theory of coordinated management of meaning formation in the management of social processes. In: Global challenges and regional development in the mirror of sociological measurements: materials of the IV Intern. scientific-practical. Internet Conf., Vologda, March 25 – April 2, 2019. Vologda: VolRC RAS. P. 184-189 (In Rus.).
2. Andriyanova T.V. (2021a). “Public dialogue” and its managerial perspectives in the communication theory of B.W. Pierce and V.E. Kronen. Communicology. Vol. 9. No. 1. P. 151-159. DOI: 10.21453/2311-3065-2021-9-1-151-159 (In Rus.).
3. Andriyanova T.V. (2021b). “Public dialogue” in the socio-cultural environment and its managerial perspectives in the communication theory of B.W. Pierce and V.E. Kronen (continued). Communicology. Vol. 9. No.2. C. 51-66. DOI: 10.21453/2311-3065-2021-9-2-51-66 (In Rus.).
4. Andriyanova T.V. (2021c). Communication Theory as a Coherent Area at the Turn of the 20th-21st Centuries in the Context of Management Influence. Wellbeing Vectors: Economics and Society. No. 2 (41). P. 1-13. DOI: 10.18799/26584956/2021/2(41)/1113 (In Rus.).
5. Banas J.A., Rains S.A. (2010). A Meta-Analysis of Research on Inoculation Theory. Communication Monographs. No. 77 (3). Р. 281–311. DOI:10.1080/03637751003758193.
6. Banks T., Squires G., Anhalt K. (2014). Interdisciplinary Collaboration: Cognitive Behavioral Interventions in Special Education and School Psychology. Creative Education. Vol. 5. № 10. DOI: 10.4236/ce.2014.510089.
7. Biddle B.J., Thomas E.J. (1966). Role Theory: Concepts and Research. N.Y.: Wiley.
8. Briesett D., Edgley Ch., Stebbins R.A. (1975). Life as Theater. Chicago: Aldine. Burke K. (1969). A Rhetoric of Motives. Berkeley: University of California Press.
9. Cohen M. (2013). Novel Approaches to Anthropology: Contributions to Literary Anthropology. N.Y.: Lexington Books.
10. Cronen V.E., Pearce W.B., Harris L.M. (1979). The Logic of the Coordinated Management of Meaning: A Substantive Approach to Communication Education. Communication Education. No. 28. Р. 22-38.
11. Donohue W., Cushman D.P., Hofsinger R.E. Jr. (1980). Creating and Confronting Social Order: A Comparison of Raise Perspectives. Western Journal of Speech Communication. No. 44. Р. 5-10.
12. Duncan H.D. (1968). Communication and Social Order. London: Oxford University Press.
13. Gerst D., Krämer H., Salomon R. (2019). Harold Garfinkel’s «Studies in Ethnomethodology». Аn Interview Project. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research. No. 20 (2). DOI: 10.17169/fqs-20.2.3288.
14. Goffman E. (1959). The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. Garden City, N.Y.: Doubledaу.
15. Grene M. (2015). The Anatomy of Knowledge. N.Y.: Routledge.
16. Gritsanov A.A. (2008). Social reality: understanding the main paradigms. Issues of social theory. Vol. II. Issue. 12. P. 133-147 (In Rus.).
17. Hall E.T. (1977). Beyond culture. Garden city, N.Y.: Doubled.
18. Klishina O.S. (2011). The study of a dramatic work using the focus group method (ethnosociological analysis of A.N. Ostrovsky, “The Forest”). Historical, philosophical, political and legal sciences, cultural studies and art history. Questions of theory and practice. No. 8(14). P. 96-110 (In Rus.).
19. Koestler A. (1978). Janus: A Summing Up. N.Y.: Random Нouse. Korta K. (2008). Malinowski and pragmatics: Claim making in the history of linguistics. Journal of Pragmatics. No. 40 (10). Р. 1645-1660. DOI:10.1016/j.pragma.2007.12.006/.
20. Miller G.R., Berger Ch.R. (1977). On Keeping the Faith in Matters Scientific. Western Journal of Speech Communication. No. 41. Р. 44-57.
21. Pattison E.M. (2015). Role Theory: Concepts and Research. International Journal of Group Psychotherapy. No. 17 (3). Р. 404-405. DOI: 10.1080/00207284.1967.11643041.
22. Pearce W. (1976). The Coordinated Management of Meaning: A Rules Based Theory of Interpersonal Communication. In: G.R. Miller (ed.) Explorations In Interpersonal Communication. Beverly Hills: Sage. Р. 17-35.
23. Pearce W.B., Conklin F. (1979). A Model of Hierarchical Meanings in Coherent Conversation and a Study of Indirect Responses. Communication Monographs. No. 46. Р. 75-87.
24. Pearce W.B., Cronen V. (1980). Communication, action, and meaning: The creation of social realities. New York: Praeger. Р. 99-109.
25. Pearce W.B., Cronen V.S., Conklin F. (1979). On What to Look at When Analyzing Communication: A Hierarchical Model of Actions' Meanings. Communication. No. 4. Р. 195-221.
26. Rogers E.M., Нart W.B., Мiike Y. (2002). Edward T. Hall and The History of Intercultural Communication: The United States and Japan. Keio Communication Review. No. 24. Р. 3-26.
27. Sharkov F.I., Mikhailov V.A., Mikhailov S.V. (2019). Public opinion: information and communication aspect. Communicology. Vol. 7. No. 1. P. 66-77. DOI: 10.21453/2311-3065-2019-7-1-66-77 (In Rus.).
28. Wittgenstein L. (1967). Philosophical investigations, 3rd ed. (G.E.M. Anscombe, Trans.). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
Review
For citations:
Andriyanova T.V. Forms of Interaction in the Conditions of Social Reality Management: Dramatic metaphor by B.W. Pierce and V.E. Kronen. Communicology. 2022;10(1):29-40. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21453/2311-3065-2022-10-1-29-40
Views:
243
Email this article 
