Preview

Communicology

Advanced search

Challenges of communication with public and state for Russian experts in international relations

https://doi.org/10.21453/2311-3065-2022-10-2-41-55

Abstract

This paper regards the communication aspects of the activities of Russian think tanks specializing in international relations. The importance of expertise on a wide range of issues of foreign policy is arising. This trend is observed both in Russia and abroad. However, simultaneously it is accompanied by the spreading post-truth, which often ensures the competence of a professional. The dominance of one of these discursive practices mostly depends on the communication peculiarities between experts, society, and authorities within a state. In such circumstances, the study of the Russian context seems to be very relevant. The work is organized in accordance with deductive logic: the first part analyzes general aspects (the notion of expert community, its functions, potential and limits of participation in public discussion and political process); the second part focuses on Russian think tanks specializing in international affairs as a more concrete case. The authors point out the features of communication with the public and study how the experts in international relations influence the Russian public opinion on foreign policy. In conclusion, the authors summarize the existing communication challenges and provide recommendations to increase the experts’ role in the public discussion on foreign policy.

About the Authors

A. D. Batagova
HSE University
Russian Federation

Batagova Anastasia Denisovna – graduate student of the Faculty of Communications, Media and Design  

115054, Moscow, Malaya Pionerskaya st., 12



E. A. Kuvyrkova
Lomonosov Moscow State University (MSU)
Russian Federation

Kuvyrkova Ekaterina Aleksandrovna – senior lecturer at School of World Politics 

Moscow



References

1. Bell D. (1976). The Coming of Post-Industrial Society: A Venture in Social Forecasting. Basic Books.

2. Belyaeva N.Y., Zaitsev D.G. (2009). “Think tanks” in Russia and Western countries: a comparative analysis. Mirovaya ekonomika i mezhdunarodnye otnosheniya. No. 1. P. 26-35 (In Rus.).

3. Bubnova N.I. (2017). “Think tanks” as an actor in modern politics. Comparative Politics. Vol. 8. No. 3. P. 8-19 (In Rus.).

4. Dickson P. (1971). Think tanks. New York: Atheneum. New York: Ballantine Books.

5. Kazakova E.V. (2011). The role of Russian expert communities in political modernization. Vlast. No. 3. P. 11-14 (In Rus.).

6. Koshkin P.G. (2020). Coronavirus in Minds: How the Pandemic Turned into an Information Epidemic and How to Fight It. In: RIAC [el. source]: https://russiancouncil.ru/analytics-and-comments/analytics/koronavirus-v-umakh-kak-pandemiya-prevratilas-v-informatsionnuyu-epidemiyu-i-kaks-ney-borotsya/?sphrase_id= 88541606.

7. McGann J. (2003). Think Tanks and the Transnationalization of Foreign Policy. Connections. Vol. 2. No. 1. P. 85-90.

8. McGann J. (2020). 2019 Global Go To Think Tank Index Report. TTCSP Global Go To Think Tank Index Reports, 17. The Lauder Institute University of Pennsylvania [el. source]: https://repository.upenn.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1018&context=think_tanks.

9. McGann J. (2021). 2020 Global Go To Think Tank Index Report. TTCSP Global Go To Think Tank Index Reports, 18. The Lauder Institute University of Pennsylvania [el. source]: https://repository.upenn.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1019&context=think_tanks.

10. Naim M. (2009). What Is a GONGO? Foreign Policy [el. source]: https://foreignpolicy.com/2009/10/13/what-is-a-gongo/.

11. Rich A. (2004). Think tanks, public policy, and the politics of expertise. Cambridge University Press.

12. Sosunov D.V. (2012). The role of the expert community in the process of making political decisions. Bulletin of the Voronezh State University. Series: History. Political science. Sociology. No. 1. P. 171-173 (In Rus.).


Review

For citations:


Batagova A.D., Kuvyrkova E.A. Challenges of communication with public and state for Russian experts in international relations. Communicology. 2022;10(2):41-55. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21453/2311-3065-2022-10-2-41-55

Views: 231


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2311-3065 (Print)
ISSN 2311-3332 (Online)