Plain and easy language as a new trend of communication between the state and society
https://doi.org/10.21453/2311-3065-2022-10-2-85-94
Abstract
Analyzing the modern communication practices of authorities at different levels, as well as speeches and posts on social networks of a number of Russian officials, the author of points to noticeable changes in the style of communication between the state and society compared to previous periods. These changes seem to be caused by the need for the authorities to master the increasingly popular new media and communicate with an audience that, due to its training, cannot perceive information in an official style. The trigger of these changes, outlined since the advent of new means of communication and supported by the active spread of the Internet, was the situation of the coronavirus pandemic, which required the state to build crisis communications that require clarity of messages, speed of their delivery and appeal to the emotions of the audience. The noted changes can be considered a trend that will only intensify, including due to the growth in popularity of ‘plain and easy language’ observed in many European countries, which has become a response to the problem of low level of reader literacy. However, it will mainly be supported due to the active development of new formats of communication between the state and society, built on the basis of popular social networks among the audience, which can be considered the result of the so-called fifth communication revolution, which blurs the line between written and oral speech and leads to the emergence of new speech genres. State institutions willingly accept changes and express a desire to seek a new tone of voice in communication with citizens, as well as to learn relevant communication practices.
About the Author
L. V. KatyshevaRussian Federation
Katysheva Larisa Valerievna – Senior Researcher of Modern Technologies in Public Administration Research Laboratory.
119571, Moscow, Vernadsky av., 82
References
1. Bell D. (1996). The Cultural Contradictions of Capitalism. Basic Books; special ed.
2. Betoncu O., Ozdamli F. (2019). The disease of 21st century: Digital disease. Central and Eastern European Online Library [el. source]: https://www.ceeol.com/search/article-detail?id=769088.
3. Cressler J.D. (1998). The Communications Revolution. In: Silicon Earth, 2nd ed. CRC Press, 2016.
4. Dan L.I. (2021). On the Basic Conditions and Realistic Approaches to Build the Belt and Road Cultural Community. Journal of Renmin University of China. Vol. 35. No. 6. P. 165-175.
5. Fremer M., Leskelä L., Onkamo U., Piehl A., Raevaara L., Tiililä U. (2019). Clear language is inclusive and prevents exclusion [el. source]: https://vm.fi/documents/10623/12914468 /Policy_Brief_1_2019.pdf/0a1dd1b1-257f-1f18-63ba-36ea83a9c308/Policy_Brief_1_20-19.pdf.
6. Kortti J. (2021). Revolution talk and media history. In: Academia Letters Helda [el. source]: https://doi.org/10.20935/AL811.
7. Logan R. (2020). Marshall McLuhan’s General System Thinking and Media Ecology. New Explorations: Studies in Culture and Communication. Vol. 1. No. 2. P. 187-200.
8. Technical Report of the Survey of Adult Skills (2019). OECD [el. source]: https://www.oecd.org/skills/piaac/publications/PIAAC_Technical_Report_2019.pdf.
9. Katysheva L.V. (2020). Modern leaders in the fight against the pandemic and mistrust. Personality: resources and potential. No. 4 (8). P. 18-24 (In Rus.).
10. Katysheva L.V. (2021). Finnish and South Korean practices as a basis for finding universal approaches to crisis communications during the COVID-19 pandemic. Communicology. Vol. 9. No. 4. P. 66-82 (In Rus.).
11. Medina D. (2018). Brain rules. What you and your children should know about the brain. Moscow: Mann, Ivanov and Ferber (In Rus.).
12. Nechaeva N.V., Helmle K.-S., Kairova E.M. (2021). Translation into clear and / or simple languages as an intralingual type of translation and training of translators. Bulletin of the Volgograd State University. Series 2. Linguistics. Vol. 20. No. 3. P. 99-108 (In Rus.).
13. Shevchenko V.E. (2013). Theoretical Foundations of Visual Communication. Scientific Bulletin of BelSU. Ser. Humanitarian sciences. No. 20 (163). Issue. 19. P. 174-180 (In Rus.).
Review
For citations:
Katysheva L.V. Plain and easy language as a new trend of communication between the state and society. Communicology. 2022;10(2):85-94. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21453/2311-3065-2022-10-2-85-94