Preview

Communicology

Advanced search

Communication aspects of secondary socialization

https://doi.org/10.21453/2311-3065-2022-10-2-118-132

Abstract

The article concentrates on the study of the current problem of communication aspects of secondary socialization in the modern information society. Media play a significant role in all areas of post-industrial society, and socialization processes, in particular secondary socialization, are no exception. In this article the phenomenon of secondary socialization is described, approaches to its comprehensive understanding both from the point of view of classics of sociology and modern researchers are offered. An idea of the mechanism of functioning of this social phenomenon is given from the author’s point of view. The importance of media as the main channel for the transmission of socializing content in the modern socialization process in a society with intense communication links is also studied. The concept of the “media significant other” is given as a new approach to understanding the communication aspects of secondary socialization in modern society. The essence of the “media significant other” concept is revealed in the connection with the phenomenon of the “significant other”, also its features and its place in the system of secondary socialization is considered. Using the example of influencers, the case of functioning of the “media significant other” in the information and socialization space is considered. The article analyzes the data of a study aimed at empirically fixing the existence of the phenomenon of “media significant others” as personalities from the media sphere who influence following respondents.

About the Author

R. A. Zakharkin
Far Eastern Federal University
Russian Federation

Zakharkin Roman Aleksandrovich – CandSc (Soc.), assistant professor, Department of Communications and Media, School of Arts and Humanities 

690922, Vladivostok, Russky Island, Ajax Bay, 10



References

1. Abidin C., Lee J., Barbetta T., Miao W.S. (2020). Influencers and COVID-19: reviewing key issues in press coverage across Australia, China, Japan, and South Korea. Media International Australia. Vol. 178 (1). P. 1-22. DOI: 10.1177/1329878X20959838.

2. Bandura A. (2000). Social learning theory. St. Petersburg: Eurasia (In Rus.).

3. Berger P., Luckmann T. (1995) The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise on Sociology of Knowledge / Transl. E.D. Rutkevich. Moscow: Medium (In Rus.).

4. Castells M. (2000). The information age: Economy, Society and Culture / Transl. & sc. ed. O.I. Shkaratan. Moscow: The Higher School of Economics State University (In Rus.).

5. Castells M. (2017). Communication power / Transl. N.M. Tylevich, A.A. Arhipova; sc. ed. A.I. Chernyh. Moscow: The Higher School of Economics Publishing House (In Rus.).

6. Frønes I. (2016). The Autonomous Child. Theorizing Socialization. Springer. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-25100-4.

7. Kislitsyna A.A. (2019). Influence marketing in modern political campaigns. Society: politics, economics, law. №8(73). P. 54-58 (In Rus.).

8. Kraus L.-M., Daenekindt S. (2021). Moving into multiculturalism. Multicultural attitudes of socially mobile individuals without a migration background. European Societies. P. 1-22. DOI: 10.1080/14616696.2021.1976415.

9. Melitskaya-Pavlovskaya G. (2021). Socialization as a process of formation of social and cultural identity of a person: theoretical ideas and realities of the global world. Scientific notes. Electronic scientific journal of Kursk State University. P. 735-756 (In Rus.).

10. Monge Benito S., Elorriaga Illera A., Olabarri Fernández E. (2020). YouTube celebrity endorsement: audience evaluation of source attributes and response to sponsored content. A case study of influencer Verdeliss. Communication & Society. Vol. 33 (3). P. 149-166. DOI: 10.15581/003.33.3.149-166.

11. Simon E., Pleschova G. (2021). PhD students, significant others, and pedagogical conversations. The importance of trusting relationships for academic development. International Journal for Academic Development. Vol. 26, Issue 3. P. 279-291. DOI: 10.1080/1360144X.2021.1949324.

12. Skiple A. (2020). The Importance of Significant Others in Preventing Extremism: The Philosophy and Practice of the Swedish Tolerance Project. Young. Vol. 28, Issue 4. P. 422-438. DOI: 10.1177/1103308820914828.

13. Toffler A. (1999). The Third Wave / Transl. L.M. Burmistrova, K.L. Tatarinova, K. Burmistrov, Z.A. Zaritovskaya; sc. ed. S.A. Gudimova. Moscow: OOO Firma Izdatelstvo AST (In Rus.).

14. Tyurikov A., Kosarenko N., Gvozdeva T., Voronina M., Grishnova E., Solovyeva N. (2018). New social reality in the context of information and communication technologies. XLinguae. Vol. 11, Issue 3. P. 67-75. DOI: 10.18355/XL.2018.11.03.06.


Review

For citations:


Zakharkin R.A. Communication aspects of secondary socialization. Communicology. 2022;10(2):118-132. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21453/2311-3065-2022-10-2-118-132

Views: 278


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2311-3065 (Print)
ISSN 2311-3332 (Online)