Preview

Communicology

Advanced search

Soft Skills of a Higher Education Student: communicative aspect

https://doi.org/10.21453/2311-3065-2025-13-2-120-130

Abstract

The article represents the results of the empirical analysis analyzes students’ soft skills, which have recently become a key element of the competitiveness of university graduates. It also provides data from all-Russian surveys of SberPodbor, Rabota.ru and the National Research University Higher School of Economics, demonstrating a clear demand from the labor market for such skills like creativity, adaptability and communicative literacy. The emphasis on the latter, already enshrined in the Federal State Educational Standard of Higher Education 3++, is not adequately reflected in the actual training of university graduates, which is confirmed by the feedback from employers who note a deficit of skills in public speaking, argumentation and teamwork, and university teachers. In particular, it points to the weaknesses in kinetic image, confidence and structured speech. Further, this reflects a systemic gap between declared educational standards and the practice of forming the communicative potential of higher education students. The authors propose to consider methods for diagnosing communicative potential (Ryakhovsky test, the method of diagnosing communicative and social competence KOSKOM, the method of assessing the communicative and organizational potential KOS). In addition to the above assessment methods, the authors propose to take into account the structure of a public speech, which includes five fundamental elements for effective speech construction: audio-visual, purpose, structure, maintaining contact with the audience, as well as the psycho-emotional state of the speaker. Particular emphasis is laid on the study of emotional intelligence, which serves as a cognitive-emotional foundation for soft skills, enhancing their practical application in communication, and is also considered as social capital that contributes to the successful integration of an individual into groups, organizations and society as a whole.

About the Authors

D. N. Karpova
Moscow State Institute of International Relations (MGIMO – University)
Russian Federation

Karpova Daria Nikolaevna – CandSc (Soc.), associate professor of Sociological Department

119571, Moscow, Vernadsky av., 76.



T. D. Kapitonenkova
Moscow State Institute of International Relations (MGIMO – University)
Russian Federation

Kapitonenkova Tatyana Dmitrievna – postgraduate student of Sociological Department; research fellow of the research laboratory “Science and universities in the mirror of social institutions”

119571, Moscow, Vernadsky av., 76.



References

1. Ekman P. (2024). Psychology of emotions. I know what you feel. St. Petersburg: Piter (in Rus.).

2. Gandapas R. (2020). The Kama Sutra for the Speaker. Ten Chapters on How to Receive and Deliver Maximum Pleasure When Speaking in Public. Moscow: Mann, Ivanov and Ferber (in Rus.).

3. Goleman D. (2022). Emotional Intelligence: Why It Can Mean More Than IQ (transl. E. Efimova), 12th ed. rev. Moscow: Mann, Ivanov and Ferber (in Rus.).

4. Jumma T. (2020). Speak Beautifully and Persuasively. How to Communicate and Speak Easily and Effectively: A Practical Guide to Communications. Moscow: AST (in Rus.).

5. Kulikova L.N., ed. (2008). Assessment of the level of sociability (Ryakhovsky test). In: Study of the humanitarian culture of students: a collection of diagnostic methods. Khabarovsk: Pacific State University. P. 43-45 (in Rus.).

6. Kunitsyna V.N., Kazarinova N.V., Pogolsha V.M. (2001). Interpersonal communication. Textbook for universities. SPb.: Piter (in Rus.).

7. Lopes P., Salovey P., Straus R. (2003). Emotional Intelligence, Personality, and the Perceived Quality of Social Relationships. Personality and Individual Differences. P. 641-658. DOI: 10.1016/S0191-8869(02)00242-8.

8. Mayer J., Roberts R., Barsade S. (2008). Human abilities: emotional intelligence. Annual Review of Psychology. Vol. 59. P. 507-536. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093646.

9. Nepryakhin N. (2019). How to speak in public: 50 questions and answers. Moscow: Alpina Publisher (in Rus.).

10. Salovey P., Mayer J. (1989-90). Emotional intelligence. Imagination, imagination, cognition and personality. Vol. 9 (3). P. 185-211. DOI: 10.2190/DUGG-P24E-52WK-6CDG.

11. Stepanova L.N., Zeer E.F. (2019). Soft Skills as predictors of students' life self-fulfillment. Education and Science. Vol. 21. No. 8. P. 65-89 (in Rus.).

12. Stepashkina E.A., Sukhodoev A.K., Guzhelya D.Yu. (2022). A study of the profile of supraprofessional competencies demanded by leading employers when hiring university students, graduates and young professionals. Moscow: National Research University Higher School of Economics, Institute of Education (Modern Analytics of Education. No. 2 (62)) (in Rus.).

13. Zhebit V.A. (2005). Communication Theory. Nonlinear Communication. Moscow: Sputnik (in Rus.).


Review

For citations:


Karpova D.N., Kapitonenkova T.D. Soft Skills of a Higher Education Student: communicative aspect. Communicology. 2025;13(2):120-130. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21453/2311-3065-2025-13-2-120-130

Views: 11


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2311-3065 (Print)
ISSN 2311-3332 (Online)