Preview

Communicology

Advanced search

Discourse analysis of the concept of the Community of the Common Destiny and its reflexive component

https://doi.org/10.21453/2311-3065-2021-9-2-79-87

Abstract

The author attempts to comprehend, from the standpoint of sociological discourse analysis, the main modern foreign policy concept of China – the Community of the Common Destiny. In the context of the multi-vector confrontation between the United States and China, the main struggle is for the loyalty of Europeans, namely, citizens of the most economically developed countries of the European Union. In this context, Beijing views discursive power as one of the main tools, without the development and application of which it is impossible to naturally take its rightful place in the international arena. After analyzing Western philosophical theories, including those that were used to create the European Union (Bauer, Renan), the Chinese leadership put forward a global concept that was the result of corresponding sociological reflection. According to Habermas, discourse involves the involvement of the Other in the discussion and is aimed at achieving mutual understanding and agreement. Discourse analysis of the Community of the Common Destiny (based on the material of some speeches of the PRC Chairman Xi Jinping) confirms the following hypothesis: despite its global character and corresponding ambitions, it is formulated in such a way as to be understandable and acceptable, primarily for Europeans.

About the Author

N. B. Pomozova
Russian State University for the Humanities
Russian Federation

Pomozova – Cand. Sc. (Soc.), assistant professor at the Department of Contemporary East

125047, Moscow, Miusskaya sq., 6



References

1. Bandurski D. (2019). The Future of Common Destiny. Retreived 05.04.2021 from: https://www.echo-wall.eu/state-mind/future-common-destiny.

2. Bauer O. (1999). The Question of Nationalities and Social Democracy, ed. Omar Dahbour., Micheline R. Ishay. Humanity Books.

3. Dagon J.V. (1999). Ernest Renan and the Question of Race. Diss. thesis. Retreived 27.05.2021 from: https://digitalcommons.lsu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=7936&context=gradschool_disstheses.

4. Habermas J. (2001). The inclusion of the other (transl.). SPb: Nauka (in Rus.).

5. Litvak N., Pomozova N. (2021). Foreign policy priorities in the human resources policy of the International Department of the CPC Central Committee. World economy and international relations. Vol. 65. No. 6. P. 51-58.

6. Nadezhkina E.S., Kirillina N.V. (2020). The Northern Neighbor: memes about people and power as a tool for shaping the image of Russia in Chinese digital space. Communicology (Russia). Vol. 8. No.2. P. 182-193.

7. Pomozova N. (2018). Reflection of the foreign policy vector in the discourse of reports at the 15th – 19th Congresses of the Communist Party of China. State and municipal administration. No. 4. P. 151-156.

8. Wang J. (2018). Xi Jinping’s ‘Major Country Diplomacy:’ A Paradigm Shift? Journal of Contemporary China. Vol. 28. No.15. P. 15-30.

9. Xi Jinping (2017). The governance of China. Foreign Languages Press. Beijing. Xi

10. Jinping (2018). The governance of China. Beijing (In Rus.).


Review

For citations:


Pomozova N.B. Discourse analysis of the concept of the Community of the Common Destiny and its reflexive component. Communicology. 2021;9(2):79-87. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.21453/2311-3065-2021-9-2-79-87

Views: 357


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2311-3065 (Print)
ISSN 2311-3332 (Online)